Development of measures for assessing mistreatment of women during facility-based childbirth based on labour observations

• Published in: BMJ global health 2021-08, Vol.5 (Suppl 2), p.e004080
• Main Authors: Berger, Blair O, Strobino, Donna M, Mehrtash, Hedieh, Bohren, Meghan A, Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame, Leslie, Hannah H, Irinyenikan, Theresa Azonima, Maung, Thae Maung, Balde, Mamadou Dioulde, Tunçalp, Özge
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Childbirth & labor; Cross-Sectional Studies; cross-sectional survey; Delivery, Obstetric; Factor analysis; Female; Humans; Maternal & child health; Maternal child nursing; maternal health; Obstetrics; Original Research; Parturition; Patient-centered care; Pregnancy; Public health; Qualitative research; Quality of Health Care; Reproducibility of Results; Risk factors; Systematic review; Validity; Well being; Womens health
• ISSN: 2059-7908; 2059-7908
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004080

IntroductionMistreatment of women during childbirth is increasingly recognised as a significant issue globally. Research and programmatic efforts targeting this phenomenon have been limited by a lack of validated measurement tools. This study aimed to develop a set of concise, valid and reliable multidimensional measures for mistreatment using labour observations applicable across multiple settings.MethodsData from continuous labour observations of 1974 women in Nigeria (n=407), Ghana (n=912) and Guinea (n=655) were used from the cross-sectional WHO’s multicountry study ‘How women are treated during facility-based childbirth’ (2016–2018). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to develop a scale measuring interpersonal abuse. Two indexes were developed through a modified Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development approach for generating composite indexes. Measures were evaluated for performance, validity and internal reliability.ResultsThree mistreatment measures were developed: a 7-item Interpersonal Abuse Scale, a 3-item Exams & Procedures Index and a 12-item Unsupportive Birth Environment Index. Factor analysis results showed a consistent unidimensional factor structure for the Interpersonal Abuse Scale in all three countries based on factor loadings and interitem correlations, indicating good structural construct validity. The scale had a reliability coefficient of 0.71 in Nigeria and approached 0.60 in Ghana and Guinea. Low correlations (Spearman correlation range: −0.06–0.19; p≥0.05) between mistreatment measures supported our decision to develop three separate measures. Predictive criterion validation yielded mixed results across countries. Both items within measures and measure scores were internally consistent across countries; each item co-occurred with other items in a measure, and scores consistently distinguished between ‘high’ and ‘low’ mistreatment levels.ConclusionThe set of concise, comprehensive multidimensional measures of mistreatment can be used in future research and quality improvement initiatives targeting mistreatment to quantify burden, identify risk factors and determine its impact on health and well-being outcomes. Further validation and reliability testing of the measures in other contexts is needed.