Loading…

Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There is a significant research gap in meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This study analyzed the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Published phase I, phase II, and phase III trials analyzing safety and immunogenicity and phase III randomized clini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in immunology 2021-10, Vol.12, p.714170-714170
Main Authors: Sharif, Nadim, Alzahrani, Khalid J., Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar, Dey, Shuvra Kanti
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3
container_end_page 714170
container_issue
container_start_page 714170
container_title Frontiers in immunology
container_volume 12
creator Sharif, Nadim
Alzahrani, Khalid J.
Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar
Dey, Shuvra Kanti
description There is a significant research gap in meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This study analyzed the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Published phase I, phase II, and phase III trials analyzing safety and immunogenicity and phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines were included. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and The Lancet for published articles evaluating the relative reduction in COVID-19 risk after vaccination. Selected literatures were published between December 15, 2019 and May 15, 2021 on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines. This meta-analysis included studies that confirmed cases of COVID-19 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. This study detected 8,926 eligible research articles published on COVID-19 vaccines. Of these, 25 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the selected articles, 19 randomized clinical trials, 2 non-randomized clinical trials, and 3 observational studies were analyzed. Seven (28%) studies were included in the meta-analysis. The efficacy of the adenovirus vector vaccine was 73% (95% CI = 69–77) and that of the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was 85% (95% CI = 82–88) in participants aged ≥18 years. There are no reports of clinical trials in participants aged under 16 years. The production of neutralizing antibodies against receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in >90% of the vaccinated samples was reported within 0–30 days of the first or the second dose of the vaccine. Pain at the injection site was the most common local symptom in people receiving mRNA vaccines (29%–85% of participants). Fever (0.2%–95%) was the most prevalent in people receiving adenovirus vector vaccines, and fatigue (8.4%–55%) was the most common side effect in people receiving the mRNA vaccines. Studies suggest that mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines can provide moderate to high protection against COVID-19 infection in people over 18 years. Evidence of the long-term protection of the vaccines in people aged under 16 years against the multiple variants of COVID-19 are limited. This study will provide an integrated evaluation on the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccines.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fimmu.2021.714170
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c046055e23794a98950acecd78d46405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c046055e23794a98950acecd78d46405</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2587738132</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxS0EolXpB-CWIwey-G9sc0BabQus1KoShV6tWWe8uEriEmeL8u3x7lao9cWj8fNv5ukR8p7RhRDGfgqx73cLTjlbaCaZpq_IKWsaWQvO5etn9Qk5z_meliOtEEK9JSdCaqobyk-JuwwhevDzx2pdeEPa4hB9nOYKhra6hYClTKFa3dytL2pmqzvwPg6YP1fL6nbOE_YwRV_9wMeIfw-frnGCejlAN-eY35E3AbqM50_3Gfn19fLn6nt9dfNtvVpe1V5RM9XIrVESNo0KnvNiz7ZBA2MGpAeulaFNCBsqmbTByKAbWwyjl4CBMmFAnJH1kdsmuHcPY-xhnF2C6A6NNG4djGXRDp2nsqFKIRfaSrDGKgoefatNKxtJVWF9ObIedpseW4_DNEL3AvryZYi_3TY9umKBG80L4MMTYEx_dpgn18fssetgwLTLjiujtTBM7KXsKPVjynnE8H8Mo26fszvk7PY5u2PO4h8lYZlJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2587738132</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sharif, Nadim ; Alzahrani, Khalid J. ; Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar ; Dey, Shuvra Kanti</creator><creatorcontrib>Sharif, Nadim ; Alzahrani, Khalid J. ; Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar ; Dey, Shuvra Kanti</creatorcontrib><description>There is a significant research gap in meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This study analyzed the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Published phase I, phase II, and phase III trials analyzing safety and immunogenicity and phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines were included. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and The Lancet for published articles evaluating the relative reduction in COVID-19 risk after vaccination. Selected literatures were published between December 15, 2019 and May 15, 2021 on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines. This meta-analysis included studies that confirmed cases of COVID-19 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. This study detected 8,926 eligible research articles published on COVID-19 vaccines. Of these, 25 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the selected articles, 19 randomized clinical trials, 2 non-randomized clinical trials, and 3 observational studies were analyzed. Seven (28%) studies were included in the meta-analysis. The efficacy of the adenovirus vector vaccine was 73% (95% CI = 69–77) and that of the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was 85% (95% CI = 82–88) in participants aged ≥18 years. There are no reports of clinical trials in participants aged under 16 years. The production of neutralizing antibodies against receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in &gt;90% of the vaccinated samples was reported within 0–30 days of the first or the second dose of the vaccine. Pain at the injection site was the most common local symptom in people receiving mRNA vaccines (29%–85% of participants). Fever (0.2%–95%) was the most prevalent in people receiving adenovirus vector vaccines, and fatigue (8.4%–55%) was the most common side effect in people receiving the mRNA vaccines. Studies suggest that mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines can provide moderate to high protection against COVID-19 infection in people over 18 years. Evidence of the long-term protection of the vaccines in people aged under 16 years against the multiple variants of COVID-19 are limited. This study will provide an integrated evaluation on the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-3224</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-3224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.714170</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34707602</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>COVID-19 vaccines ; efficacy ; immunogenicity ; Immunology ; meta-analysis ; safety</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in immunology, 2021-10, Vol.12, p.714170-714170</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 Sharif, Alzahrani, Ahmed and Dey 2021 Sharif, Alzahrani, Ahmed and Dey</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542872/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8542872/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sharif, Nadim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Khalid J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dey, Shuvra Kanti</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Frontiers in immunology</title><description>There is a significant research gap in meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This study analyzed the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Published phase I, phase II, and phase III trials analyzing safety and immunogenicity and phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines were included. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and The Lancet for published articles evaluating the relative reduction in COVID-19 risk after vaccination. Selected literatures were published between December 15, 2019 and May 15, 2021 on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines. This meta-analysis included studies that confirmed cases of COVID-19 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. This study detected 8,926 eligible research articles published on COVID-19 vaccines. Of these, 25 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the selected articles, 19 randomized clinical trials, 2 non-randomized clinical trials, and 3 observational studies were analyzed. Seven (28%) studies were included in the meta-analysis. The efficacy of the adenovirus vector vaccine was 73% (95% CI = 69–77) and that of the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was 85% (95% CI = 82–88) in participants aged ≥18 years. There are no reports of clinical trials in participants aged under 16 years. The production of neutralizing antibodies against receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in &gt;90% of the vaccinated samples was reported within 0–30 days of the first or the second dose of the vaccine. Pain at the injection site was the most common local symptom in people receiving mRNA vaccines (29%–85% of participants). Fever (0.2%–95%) was the most prevalent in people receiving adenovirus vector vaccines, and fatigue (8.4%–55%) was the most common side effect in people receiving the mRNA vaccines. Studies suggest that mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines can provide moderate to high protection against COVID-19 infection in people over 18 years. Evidence of the long-term protection of the vaccines in people aged under 16 years against the multiple variants of COVID-19 are limited. This study will provide an integrated evaluation on the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccines.</description><subject>COVID-19 vaccines</subject><subject>efficacy</subject><subject>immunogenicity</subject><subject>Immunology</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>safety</subject><issn>1664-3224</issn><issn>1664-3224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9v1DAQxS0EolXpB-CWIwey-G9sc0BabQus1KoShV6tWWe8uEriEmeL8u3x7lao9cWj8fNv5ukR8p7RhRDGfgqx73cLTjlbaCaZpq_IKWsaWQvO5etn9Qk5z_meliOtEEK9JSdCaqobyk-JuwwhevDzx2pdeEPa4hB9nOYKhra6hYClTKFa3dytL2pmqzvwPg6YP1fL6nbOE_YwRV_9wMeIfw-frnGCejlAN-eY35E3AbqM50_3Gfn19fLn6nt9dfNtvVpe1V5RM9XIrVESNo0KnvNiz7ZBA2MGpAeulaFNCBsqmbTByKAbWwyjl4CBMmFAnJH1kdsmuHcPY-xhnF2C6A6NNG4djGXRDp2nsqFKIRfaSrDGKgoefatNKxtJVWF9ObIedpseW4_DNEL3AvryZYi_3TY9umKBG80L4MMTYEx_dpgn18fssetgwLTLjiujtTBM7KXsKPVjynnE8H8Mo26fszvk7PY5u2PO4h8lYZlJ</recordid><startdate>20211011</startdate><enddate>20211011</enddate><creator>Sharif, Nadim</creator><creator>Alzahrani, Khalid J.</creator><creator>Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar</creator><creator>Dey, Shuvra Kanti</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211011</creationdate><title>Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Sharif, Nadim ; Alzahrani, Khalid J. ; Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar ; Dey, Shuvra Kanti</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>COVID-19 vaccines</topic><topic>efficacy</topic><topic>immunogenicity</topic><topic>Immunology</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>safety</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sharif, Nadim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alzahrani, Khalid J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dey, Shuvra Kanti</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sharif, Nadim</au><au>Alzahrani, Khalid J.</au><au>Ahmed, Shamsun Nahar</au><au>Dey, Shuvra Kanti</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in immunology</jtitle><date>2021-10-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>12</volume><spage>714170</spage><epage>714170</epage><pages>714170-714170</pages><issn>1664-3224</issn><eissn>1664-3224</eissn><abstract>There is a significant research gap in meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. This study analyzed the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines. Published phase I, phase II, and phase III trials analyzing safety and immunogenicity and phase III randomized clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines were included. We searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and The Lancet for published articles evaluating the relative reduction in COVID-19 risk after vaccination. Selected literatures were published between December 15, 2019 and May 15, 2021 on the safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines. This meta-analysis included studies that confirmed cases of COVID-19 using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. This study detected 8,926 eligible research articles published on COVID-19 vaccines. Of these, 25 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among the selected articles, 19 randomized clinical trials, 2 non-randomized clinical trials, and 3 observational studies were analyzed. Seven (28%) studies were included in the meta-analysis. The efficacy of the adenovirus vector vaccine was 73% (95% CI = 69–77) and that of the messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine was 85% (95% CI = 82–88) in participants aged ≥18 years. There are no reports of clinical trials in participants aged under 16 years. The production of neutralizing antibodies against receptor-binding domains (RBDs) of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in &gt;90% of the vaccinated samples was reported within 0–30 days of the first or the second dose of the vaccine. Pain at the injection site was the most common local symptom in people receiving mRNA vaccines (29%–85% of participants). Fever (0.2%–95%) was the most prevalent in people receiving adenovirus vector vaccines, and fatigue (8.4%–55%) was the most common side effect in people receiving the mRNA vaccines. Studies suggest that mRNA vaccines and adenovirus vector vaccines can provide moderate to high protection against COVID-19 infection in people over 18 years. Evidence of the long-term protection of the vaccines in people aged under 16 years against the multiple variants of COVID-19 are limited. This study will provide an integrated evaluation on the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccines.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>34707602</pmid><doi>10.3389/fimmu.2021.714170</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-3224
ispartof Frontiers in immunology, 2021-10, Vol.12, p.714170-714170
issn 1664-3224
1664-3224
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c046055e23794a98950acecd78d46405
source PubMed Central
subjects COVID-19 vaccines
efficacy
immunogenicity
Immunology
meta-analysis
safety
title Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy,%20Immunogenicity%20and%20Safety%20of%20COVID-19%20Vaccines:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20immunology&rft.au=Sharif,%20Nadim&rft.date=2021-10-11&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=714170&rft.epage=714170&rft.pages=714170-714170&rft.issn=1664-3224&rft.eissn=1664-3224&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fimmu.2021.714170&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2587738132%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-e29854ab65fc223899df7a118a4ca275806ffb04149f84f769170ec4aef0138a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2587738132&rft_id=info:pmid/34707602&rfr_iscdi=true