Integrating qualitative research within a clinical trials unit: developing strategies and understanding their implementation in contexts

• Published in: Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine 2024-05, Vol.25 (1), p.323-323, Article 323
• Main Authors: Segrott, Jeremy, Channon, Sue, Lloyd, Amy, Glarou, Eleni, Henley, Josie, Hughes, Jacqueline, Jacob, Nina, Milosevic, Sarah, Moriarty, Yvonne, Pell, Bethan, Robling, Mike, Strange, Heather, Townson, Julia, Brookes-Howell, Lucy
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Annual reports; Capacity Building; Clinical trials; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods; Collective action; Cooperative Behavior; Design; Funding; Humans; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Normalisation Process Theory; NPT; Qualitative methods; Qualitative Research; Randomised controlled trials; Research Design; Research Personnel - psychology; Trials units; Wales
• ISSN: 1745-6215; 1745-6215
• DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08124-7

The value of using qualitative methods within clinical trials is widely recognised. How qualitative research is integrated within trials units to achieve this is less clear. This paper describes the process through which qualitative research has been integrated within Cardiff University's Centre for Trials Research (CTR) in Wales, UK. We highlight facilitators of, and challenges to, integration. We held group discussions on the work of the Qualitative Research Group (QRG) within CTR. The content of these discussions, materials for a presentation in CTR, and documents relating to the development of the QRG were interpreted at a workshop attended by group members. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used to structure analysis. A writing group prepared a document for input from members of CTR, forming the basis of this paper. Actions to integrate qualitative research comprised: its inclusion in Centre strategies; formation of a QRG with dedicated funding/roles; embedding of qualitative research within operating systems; capacity building/training; monitoring opportunities to include qualitative methods in studies; maximising the quality of qualitative research and developing methodological innovation. Facilitators of these actions included: the influence of the broader methodological landscape within trial/study design and its promotion of the value of qualitative research; and close physical proximity of CTR qualitative staff/students allowing sharing of methodological approaches. Introduction of innovative qualitative methods generated interest among other staff groups. Challenges included: pressure to under-resource qualitative components of research, preference for a statistical stance historically in some research areas and funding structures, and difficulties faced by qualitative researchers carving out individual academic profiles when working across trials/studies. Given that CTUs are pivotal to the design and conduct of RCTs and related study types across multiple disciplines, integrating qualitative research into trials units is crucial if its contribution is to be fully realised. We have made explicit one trials unit's experience of embedding qualitative research and present this to open dialogue on ways to operationalise and optimise qualitative research in trials. NPT provides a valuable framework with which to theorise these processes, including the importance of sense-making and legitimisation when introducing new practices within organisati