Loading…
Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa
Background Brucellosis is an infectious and contagious zoonotic bacterial disease of both humans and animals. In developing countries where brucellosis is endemic, baseline data on the prevalence of brucellosis, using abattoir facilities, is important. Objectives The aim of this study was to determi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Veterinary medicine and science 2019-11, Vol.5 (4), p.545-555 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083 |
container_end_page | 555 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 545 |
container_title | Veterinary medicine and science |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Kolo, Francis B. Adesiyun, Abiodun A. Fasina, Folorunso O. Katsande, Charles T. Dogonyaro, Banenat B. Potts, Andrew Matle, Itumeleng Gelaw, Awoke K. van Heerden, Henriette |
description | Background
Brucellosis is an infectious and contagious zoonotic bacterial disease of both humans and animals. In developing countries where brucellosis is endemic, baseline data on the prevalence of brucellosis, using abattoir facilities, is important.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against Brucella in slaughter cattle at Gauteng province, South Africa and to characterize isolates of Brucella spp.
Methods
In this cross‐sectional study, un‐clotted blood samples with corresponding organ tissue samples were collected from slaughtered cattle. Serological [Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT) and indirect ELISA (iELISA)], molecular (PCR) and bacteriological methods were used to detect Brucella antibodies and Brucella spp. from 200 slaughtered cattle in 14 abattoirs.
Results
The RBT revealed a seroprevalence of brucellosis as 11.0% (22 of 200) and iELISA confirmed 5.5% (11 of 200). The estimated seroprevalence from RBT and iELISA was 5.5% while RBT and CFT was 2.0% (4 of 200). Brucella melitensis (n = 6) and B. abortus (n = 5) were isolated from 11 cattle tissues (5.5%) as confirmed to species level with AMOS PCR and differentiated from vaccine strains with Bruce‐ladder PCR. Seven of the 11 isolates originated from seropositive cattle of which five were biotyped as B. abortus bv 1 (n = 2) and B. melitensis bv 2 (n = 1) and B. melitensis bv 3 (n = 2).
Conclusions
This is the first documentation of B. melitensis in cattle in South Africa. The zoonotic risk of brucellosis posed by Brucella‐infected slaughter cattle to abattoir workers and consumers of improperly cooked beef cannot be ignored.
Seroprevalence and characterization of brucellosis in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/vms3.190 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c0faefaa9ecf481db30a90c18771f28e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c0faefaa9ecf481db30a90c18771f28e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2273754201</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt9rFDEQxxdRbKkF_wIJ-OKDW5NNsj9ehLbYWqj4cOprmE0mdzn2NmuSPal_fXO9WlvBpwyZDx9mhm9RvGb0hFFafdhuIj9hHX1WHFZU8pLRTj5_VB8UxzGuKaVMiobL5mVxwJlgQsr2sJgWGPwUcAsDjhoJjIboFQTQCYP7Dcn5kXhLzsKscRiAxAm1w0jcSDSkNCCJA8zLVcbREEjkEuaE45JAn9vehfieLPycVuTUBqfhVfHCwhDx-P49Kr5ffPp2_rm8_np5dX56XWrJK1o2naZMUEMReyuh4k0eN69ke2mM5sx0ugGBnTEoDLXIERtgLfCedQZoy4-Kq73XeFirKbgNhBvlwam7Dx-WCkJyekClqQW0AB1qK1pmek6ho5q1TcNs1WJ2fdy7prnfoNE4pgDDE-nTzuhWaum3qm7rVkiWBe_uBcH_nDEmtXHx7p4j-jmqqmrygqKiO_TtP-jaz2HMp1IVZzVnshb1X6EOPsaA9mEYRtUuFWqXCpVTkdE3j4d_AP9kIAPlHvjlBrz5r0j9-LLgO-Et8s_DYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2316315646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Kolo, Francis B. ; Adesiyun, Abiodun A. ; Fasina, Folorunso O. ; Katsande, Charles T. ; Dogonyaro, Banenat B. ; Potts, Andrew ; Matle, Itumeleng ; Gelaw, Awoke K. ; van Heerden, Henriette</creator><creatorcontrib>Kolo, Francis B. ; Adesiyun, Abiodun A. ; Fasina, Folorunso O. ; Katsande, Charles T. ; Dogonyaro, Banenat B. ; Potts, Andrew ; Matle, Itumeleng ; Gelaw, Awoke K. ; van Heerden, Henriette</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Brucellosis is an infectious and contagious zoonotic bacterial disease of both humans and animals. In developing countries where brucellosis is endemic, baseline data on the prevalence of brucellosis, using abattoir facilities, is important.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against Brucella in slaughter cattle at Gauteng province, South Africa and to characterize isolates of Brucella spp.
Methods
In this cross‐sectional study, un‐clotted blood samples with corresponding organ tissue samples were collected from slaughtered cattle. Serological [Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT) and indirect ELISA (iELISA)], molecular (PCR) and bacteriological methods were used to detect Brucella antibodies and Brucella spp. from 200 slaughtered cattle in 14 abattoirs.
Results
The RBT revealed a seroprevalence of brucellosis as 11.0% (22 of 200) and iELISA confirmed 5.5% (11 of 200). The estimated seroprevalence from RBT and iELISA was 5.5% while RBT and CFT was 2.0% (4 of 200). Brucella melitensis (n = 6) and B. abortus (n = 5) were isolated from 11 cattle tissues (5.5%) as confirmed to species level with AMOS PCR and differentiated from vaccine strains with Bruce‐ladder PCR. Seven of the 11 isolates originated from seropositive cattle of which five were biotyped as B. abortus bv 1 (n = 2) and B. melitensis bv 2 (n = 1) and B. melitensis bv 3 (n = 2).
Conclusions
This is the first documentation of B. melitensis in cattle in South Africa. The zoonotic risk of brucellosis posed by Brucella‐infected slaughter cattle to abattoir workers and consumers of improperly cooked beef cannot be ignored.
Seroprevalence and characterization of brucellosis in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1095</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-1095</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/vms3.190</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31414558</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abattoirs ; Agriculture ; Animal diseases ; Animal populations ; Animals ; Antibodies ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Brucella ; Brucella - isolation & purification ; Brucella abortus ; Brucella melitensis ; Brucellosis ; Brucellosis, Bovine - epidemiology ; Brucellosis, Bovine - microbiology ; Cattle ; Complement fixation ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Developing countries ; Epidemics ; Farms ; Female ; Fever ; Fisheries ; Goats ; Immunization ; Infections ; LDCs ; Male ; Meat products ; Original ; Preferences ; Prevalence ; Seroepidemiologic Studies ; Serology ; seroprevalence ; Sheep ; Slaughter ; South Africa - epidemiology ; Studies ; Surveillance ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>Veterinary medicine and science, 2019-11, Vol.5 (4), p.545-555</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Veterinary Medicine and Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9470-9421 ; 0000-0002-3577-1273 ; 0000-0001-6368-5279 ; 0000-0003-2872-8864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2316315646/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2316315646?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31414558$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kolo, Francis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adesiyun, Abiodun A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasina, Folorunso O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsande, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogonyaro, Banenat B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matle, Itumeleng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelaw, Awoke K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heerden, Henriette</creatorcontrib><title>Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa</title><title>Veterinary medicine and science</title><addtitle>Vet Med Sci</addtitle><description>Background
Brucellosis is an infectious and contagious zoonotic bacterial disease of both humans and animals. In developing countries where brucellosis is endemic, baseline data on the prevalence of brucellosis, using abattoir facilities, is important.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against Brucella in slaughter cattle at Gauteng province, South Africa and to characterize isolates of Brucella spp.
Methods
In this cross‐sectional study, un‐clotted blood samples with corresponding organ tissue samples were collected from slaughtered cattle. Serological [Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT) and indirect ELISA (iELISA)], molecular (PCR) and bacteriological methods were used to detect Brucella antibodies and Brucella spp. from 200 slaughtered cattle in 14 abattoirs.
Results
The RBT revealed a seroprevalence of brucellosis as 11.0% (22 of 200) and iELISA confirmed 5.5% (11 of 200). The estimated seroprevalence from RBT and iELISA was 5.5% while RBT and CFT was 2.0% (4 of 200). Brucella melitensis (n = 6) and B. abortus (n = 5) were isolated from 11 cattle tissues (5.5%) as confirmed to species level with AMOS PCR and differentiated from vaccine strains with Bruce‐ladder PCR. Seven of the 11 isolates originated from seropositive cattle of which five were biotyped as B. abortus bv 1 (n = 2) and B. melitensis bv 2 (n = 1) and B. melitensis bv 3 (n = 2).
Conclusions
This is the first documentation of B. melitensis in cattle in South Africa. The zoonotic risk of brucellosis posed by Brucella‐infected slaughter cattle to abattoir workers and consumers of improperly cooked beef cannot be ignored.
Seroprevalence and characterization of brucellosis in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa.</description><subject>Abattoirs</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal diseases</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Brucella</subject><subject>Brucella - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Brucella abortus</subject><subject>Brucella melitensis</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Brucellosis, Bovine - epidemiology</subject><subject>Brucellosis, Bovine - microbiology</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Complement fixation</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Epidemics</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fever</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Goats</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Meat products</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Seroepidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>seroprevalence</subject><subject>Sheep</subject><subject>Slaughter</subject><subject>South Africa - epidemiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveillance</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>2053-1095</issn><issn>2053-1095</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt9rFDEQxxdRbKkF_wIJ-OKDW5NNsj9ehLbYWqj4cOprmE0mdzn2NmuSPal_fXO9WlvBpwyZDx9mhm9RvGb0hFFafdhuIj9hHX1WHFZU8pLRTj5_VB8UxzGuKaVMiobL5mVxwJlgQsr2sJgWGPwUcAsDjhoJjIboFQTQCYP7Dcn5kXhLzsKscRiAxAm1w0jcSDSkNCCJA8zLVcbREEjkEuaE45JAn9vehfieLPycVuTUBqfhVfHCwhDx-P49Kr5ffPp2_rm8_np5dX56XWrJK1o2naZMUEMReyuh4k0eN69ke2mM5sx0ugGBnTEoDLXIERtgLfCedQZoy4-Kq73XeFirKbgNhBvlwam7Dx-WCkJyekClqQW0AB1qK1pmek6ho5q1TcNs1WJ2fdy7prnfoNE4pgDDE-nTzuhWaum3qm7rVkiWBe_uBcH_nDEmtXHx7p4j-jmqqmrygqKiO_TtP-jaz2HMp1IVZzVnshb1X6EOPsaA9mEYRtUuFWqXCpVTkdE3j4d_AP9kIAPlHvjlBrz5r0j9-LLgO-Et8s_DYw</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Kolo, Francis B.</creator><creator>Adesiyun, Abiodun A.</creator><creator>Fasina, Folorunso O.</creator><creator>Katsande, Charles T.</creator><creator>Dogonyaro, Banenat B.</creator><creator>Potts, Andrew</creator><creator>Matle, Itumeleng</creator><creator>Gelaw, Awoke K.</creator><creator>van Heerden, Henriette</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-9421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-1273</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-5279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-8864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa</title><author>Kolo, Francis B. ; Adesiyun, Abiodun A. ; Fasina, Folorunso O. ; Katsande, Charles T. ; Dogonyaro, Banenat B. ; Potts, Andrew ; Matle, Itumeleng ; Gelaw, Awoke K. ; van Heerden, Henriette</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abattoirs</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal diseases</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Brucella</topic><topic>Brucella - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Brucella abortus</topic><topic>Brucella melitensis</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Brucellosis, Bovine - epidemiology</topic><topic>Brucellosis, Bovine - microbiology</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Complement fixation</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Epidemics</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fever</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Goats</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Meat products</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Seroepidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>seroprevalence</topic><topic>Sheep</topic><topic>Slaughter</topic><topic>South Africa - epidemiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveillance</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolo, Francis B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adesiyun, Abiodun A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasina, Folorunso O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsande, Charles T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dogonyaro, Banenat B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matle, Itumeleng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelaw, Awoke K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Heerden, Henriette</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Backfiles (Open Access)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Veterinary medicine and science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolo, Francis B.</au><au>Adesiyun, Abiodun A.</au><au>Fasina, Folorunso O.</au><au>Katsande, Charles T.</au><au>Dogonyaro, Banenat B.</au><au>Potts, Andrew</au><au>Matle, Itumeleng</au><au>Gelaw, Awoke K.</au><au>van Heerden, Henriette</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary medicine and science</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Med Sci</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>545</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>545-555</pages><issn>2053-1095</issn><eissn>2053-1095</eissn><abstract>Background
Brucellosis is an infectious and contagious zoonotic bacterial disease of both humans and animals. In developing countries where brucellosis is endemic, baseline data on the prevalence of brucellosis, using abattoir facilities, is important.
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of antibodies against Brucella in slaughter cattle at Gauteng province, South Africa and to characterize isolates of Brucella spp.
Methods
In this cross‐sectional study, un‐clotted blood samples with corresponding organ tissue samples were collected from slaughtered cattle. Serological [Rose Bengal test (RBT), complement fixation test (CFT) and indirect ELISA (iELISA)], molecular (PCR) and bacteriological methods were used to detect Brucella antibodies and Brucella spp. from 200 slaughtered cattle in 14 abattoirs.
Results
The RBT revealed a seroprevalence of brucellosis as 11.0% (22 of 200) and iELISA confirmed 5.5% (11 of 200). The estimated seroprevalence from RBT and iELISA was 5.5% while RBT and CFT was 2.0% (4 of 200). Brucella melitensis (n = 6) and B. abortus (n = 5) were isolated from 11 cattle tissues (5.5%) as confirmed to species level with AMOS PCR and differentiated from vaccine strains with Bruce‐ladder PCR. Seven of the 11 isolates originated from seropositive cattle of which five were biotyped as B. abortus bv 1 (n = 2) and B. melitensis bv 2 (n = 1) and B. melitensis bv 3 (n = 2).
Conclusions
This is the first documentation of B. melitensis in cattle in South Africa. The zoonotic risk of brucellosis posed by Brucella‐infected slaughter cattle to abattoir workers and consumers of improperly cooked beef cannot be ignored.
Seroprevalence and characterization of brucellosis in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31414558</pmid><doi>10.1002/vms3.190</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9470-9421</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3577-1273</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6368-5279</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-8864</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2053-1095 |
ispartof | Veterinary medicine and science, 2019-11, Vol.5 (4), p.545-555 |
issn | 2053-1095 2053-1095 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c0faefaa9ecf481db30a90c18771f28e |
source | PubMed Central Free; Wiley Online Library Open Access; ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Abattoirs Agriculture Animal diseases Animal populations Animals Antibodies Antibodies, Bacterial - blood Brucella Brucella - isolation & purification Brucella abortus Brucella melitensis Brucellosis Brucellosis, Bovine - epidemiology Brucellosis, Bovine - microbiology Cattle Complement fixation Cross-Sectional Studies Developing countries Epidemics Farms Female Fever Fisheries Goats Immunization Infections LDCs Male Meat products Original Preferences Prevalence Seroepidemiologic Studies Serology seroprevalence Sheep Slaughter South Africa - epidemiology Studies Surveillance Zoonoses |
title | Seroprevalence and characterization of Brucella species in cattle slaughtered at Gauteng abattoirs, South Africa |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T17%3A12%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seroprevalence%20and%20characterization%20of%20Brucella%20species%20in%20cattle%20slaughtered%20at%20Gauteng%20abattoirs,%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20medicine%20and%20science&rft.au=Kolo,%20Francis%20B.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=545&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=545-555&rft.issn=2053-1095&rft.eissn=2053-1095&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/vms3.190&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2273754201%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5320-79c0140d0eebf5a237558205fb5ddc31d9c7a4e9dde4d0fe3ee7a18a3b19da083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2316315646&rft_id=info:pmid/31414558&rfr_iscdi=true |