Loading…

Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent symptoms during and after head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to discover the spatial radiation dose-based (voxel dose) importance pattern in the major salivary glands in relation to the recovery of xerostomia 18 months afte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in radiation oncology 2020-03, Vol.5 (2), p.221-230
Main Authors: Guo, Yue, Jiang, Wei, Lakshminarayanan, Pranav, Han, Peijin, Cheng, Zhi, Bowers, Michael, Hui, Xuan, Shpitser, Ilya, Siddiqui, Sauleh, Taylor, Russell H., Quon, Harry, McNutt, Todd
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03
container_end_page 230
container_issue 2
container_start_page 221
container_title Advances in radiation oncology
container_volume 5
creator Guo, Yue
Jiang, Wei
Lakshminarayanan, Pranav
Han, Peijin
Cheng, Zhi
Bowers, Michael
Hui, Xuan
Shpitser, Ilya
Siddiqui, Sauleh
Taylor, Russell H.
Quon, Harry
McNutt, Todd
description Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent symptoms during and after head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to discover the spatial radiation dose-based (voxel dose) importance pattern in the major salivary glands in relation to the recovery of xerostomia 18 months after RT, and to compare the recovery voxel dose importance pattern to the acute incidence (injury) pattern. This study included all patients within our database with xerostomia outcomes after completion of curative intensity modulated RT. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events xerostomia grade was used to define recovered versus nonrecovered group at baseline, between end of treatment and 18 months post-RT, and beyond 18 months, respectively. Ridge logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of xerostomia recovery. Voxel doses within geometrically defined parotid glands (PG) and submandibular glands (SMG), demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were included in the algorithm. We plotted the normalized learned weights on the 3-dimensional PG and SMG structures to visualize the voxel dose importance for predicting xerostomia recovery. A total of 146 head and neck cancer patients from 2008 to 2016 were identified. The superior region of the ipsilateral and contralateral PG was the most influencial for xerostomia recovery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation for ridge logistic regression was 0.68 ± 0.07. Compared with injury, the recovery voxel dose importance pattern was more symmetrical and was influenced by lower dose voxels. The superior portion of the 2 PGs (low dose region) are the most influential on xerostomia recovery and seem to be equal in their contribution. The dissimilarity of the influence pattern between injury and recovery suggests different underlying mechanisms. The importance pattern identified by spatial radiation dose and machine learning methods can improve our understanding of normal tissue toxicities in RT. Further external validation is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c144a6afbcc242b0adffae5ce5749778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2452109419301228</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c144a6afbcc242b0adffae5ce5749778</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2389211737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSP8AB-cgli-398K6EkKrw0UgVoAKCmzVrj1uHzTq1nUg988eZJKVqL5w8Gr_v4_HMFMVLwUvBRftmWYKNoZRc9CXvSs77J8WxrBs5E7yvnz6Ij4rTlJack6tSouLPi6NKyo53Uh4Xf76tIXsY2SVYT1GY2PuQkC0mN25wMsgo8wtjSDmsPLBLNGGL8ZbBZNkiJzYPqzVEn0iWAzszm7wzG2_3Zj-xr0TFiZQ_fb5m5wh27_2M5jebA4nii-KZgzHh6d15Uvz4-OH7_Hx28eXTYn52MTONFHk29Nhza7DqrHKuUqBwoLBSXNVNY9TQNcZZ4Bxsb1Tfcic45YVTdSWF5dVJsThwbYClXke_gnirA3i9T4R4pSFmb0bURtQ1tOAGY2QtB0I6B9gYbFTdK9UR692Btd4MK6SqphxhfAR9fDP5a30Vtpom0LZ1S4DXd4AYbjaYsl75ZHAcYcKwSVpWXS-FoO-RVB6khsaQIrr7ZwTXu2XQS71bBr1bBs07TctAplcPC7y3_Bs9Cd4eBEgt33qMOhm_G5r1EU2mnvj_8f8CtMbHwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2389211737</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Guo, Yue ; Jiang, Wei ; Lakshminarayanan, Pranav ; Han, Peijin ; Cheng, Zhi ; Bowers, Michael ; Hui, Xuan ; Shpitser, Ilya ; Siddiqui, Sauleh ; Taylor, Russell H. ; Quon, Harry ; McNutt, Todd</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yue ; Jiang, Wei ; Lakshminarayanan, Pranav ; Han, Peijin ; Cheng, Zhi ; Bowers, Michael ; Hui, Xuan ; Shpitser, Ilya ; Siddiqui, Sauleh ; Taylor, Russell H. ; Quon, Harry ; McNutt, Todd</creatorcontrib><description>Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent symptoms during and after head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to discover the spatial radiation dose-based (voxel dose) importance pattern in the major salivary glands in relation to the recovery of xerostomia 18 months after RT, and to compare the recovery voxel dose importance pattern to the acute incidence (injury) pattern. This study included all patients within our database with xerostomia outcomes after completion of curative intensity modulated RT. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events xerostomia grade was used to define recovered versus nonrecovered group at baseline, between end of treatment and 18 months post-RT, and beyond 18 months, respectively. Ridge logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of xerostomia recovery. Voxel doses within geometrically defined parotid glands (PG) and submandibular glands (SMG), demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were included in the algorithm. We plotted the normalized learned weights on the 3-dimensional PG and SMG structures to visualize the voxel dose importance for predicting xerostomia recovery. A total of 146 head and neck cancer patients from 2008 to 2016 were identified. The superior region of the ipsilateral and contralateral PG was the most influencial for xerostomia recovery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation for ridge logistic regression was 0.68 ± 0.07. Compared with injury, the recovery voxel dose importance pattern was more symmetrical and was influenced by lower dose voxels. The superior portion of the 2 PGs (low dose region) are the most influential on xerostomia recovery and seem to be equal in their contribution. The dissimilarity of the influence pattern between injury and recovery suggests different underlying mechanisms. The importance pattern identified by spatial radiation dose and machine learning methods can improve our understanding of normal tissue toxicities in RT. Further external validation is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2452-1094</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2452-1094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32280822</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Head and Neck Cancer</subject><ispartof>Advances in radiation oncology, 2020-03, Vol.5 (2), p.221-230</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s).</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2466-8924 ; 0000-0003-2571-7326 ; 0000-0002-4230-9001 ; 0000-0003-4753-9057 ; 0000-0002-9437-1413 ; 0000-0003-3754-3781 ; 0000-0001-7605-4329</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136646/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109419301228$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3535,27903,27904,45759,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280822$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshminarayanan, Pranav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Peijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpitser, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Sauleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Russell H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quon, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNutt, Todd</creatorcontrib><title>Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer</title><title>Advances in radiation oncology</title><addtitle>Adv Radiat Oncol</addtitle><description>Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent symptoms during and after head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to discover the spatial radiation dose-based (voxel dose) importance pattern in the major salivary glands in relation to the recovery of xerostomia 18 months after RT, and to compare the recovery voxel dose importance pattern to the acute incidence (injury) pattern. This study included all patients within our database with xerostomia outcomes after completion of curative intensity modulated RT. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events xerostomia grade was used to define recovered versus nonrecovered group at baseline, between end of treatment and 18 months post-RT, and beyond 18 months, respectively. Ridge logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of xerostomia recovery. Voxel doses within geometrically defined parotid glands (PG) and submandibular glands (SMG), demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were included in the algorithm. We plotted the normalized learned weights on the 3-dimensional PG and SMG structures to visualize the voxel dose importance for predicting xerostomia recovery. A total of 146 head and neck cancer patients from 2008 to 2016 were identified. The superior region of the ipsilateral and contralateral PG was the most influencial for xerostomia recovery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation for ridge logistic regression was 0.68 ± 0.07. Compared with injury, the recovery voxel dose importance pattern was more symmetrical and was influenced by lower dose voxels. The superior portion of the 2 PGs (low dose region) are the most influential on xerostomia recovery and seem to be equal in their contribution. The dissimilarity of the influence pattern between injury and recovery suggests different underlying mechanisms. The importance pattern identified by spatial radiation dose and machine learning methods can improve our understanding of normal tissue toxicities in RT. Further external validation is warranted.</description><subject>Head and Neck Cancer</subject><issn>2452-1094</issn><issn>2452-1094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1vEzEQhlcIRKvSP8AB-cgli-398K6EkKrw0UgVoAKCmzVrj1uHzTq1nUg988eZJKVqL5w8Gr_v4_HMFMVLwUvBRftmWYKNoZRc9CXvSs77J8WxrBs5E7yvnz6Ij4rTlJack6tSouLPi6NKyo53Uh4Xf76tIXsY2SVYT1GY2PuQkC0mN25wMsgo8wtjSDmsPLBLNGGL8ZbBZNkiJzYPqzVEn0iWAzszm7wzG2_3Zj-xr0TFiZQ_fb5m5wh27_2M5jebA4nii-KZgzHh6d15Uvz4-OH7_Hx28eXTYn52MTONFHk29Nhza7DqrHKuUqBwoLBSXNVNY9TQNcZZ4Bxsb1Tfcic45YVTdSWF5dVJsThwbYClXke_gnirA3i9T4R4pSFmb0bURtQ1tOAGY2QtB0I6B9gYbFTdK9UR692Btd4MK6SqphxhfAR9fDP5a30Vtpom0LZ1S4DXd4AYbjaYsl75ZHAcYcKwSVpWXS-FoO-RVB6khsaQIrr7ZwTXu2XQS71bBr1bBs07TctAplcPC7y3_Bs9Cd4eBEgt33qMOhm_G5r1EU2mnvj_8f8CtMbHwQ</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Guo, Yue</creator><creator>Jiang, Wei</creator><creator>Lakshminarayanan, Pranav</creator><creator>Han, Peijin</creator><creator>Cheng, Zhi</creator><creator>Bowers, Michael</creator><creator>Hui, Xuan</creator><creator>Shpitser, Ilya</creator><creator>Siddiqui, Sauleh</creator><creator>Taylor, Russell H.</creator><creator>Quon, Harry</creator><creator>McNutt, Todd</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2466-8924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-7326</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4230-9001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-9057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-1413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-3781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-4329</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer</title><author>Guo, Yue ; Jiang, Wei ; Lakshminarayanan, Pranav ; Han, Peijin ; Cheng, Zhi ; Bowers, Michael ; Hui, Xuan ; Shpitser, Ilya ; Siddiqui, Sauleh ; Taylor, Russell H. ; Quon, Harry ; McNutt, Todd</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Head and Neck Cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Yue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakshminarayanan, Pranav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Peijin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Zhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowers, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Xuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shpitser, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Sauleh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Russell H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quon, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNutt, Todd</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Advances in radiation oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Yue</au><au>Jiang, Wei</au><au>Lakshminarayanan, Pranav</au><au>Han, Peijin</au><au>Cheng, Zhi</au><au>Bowers, Michael</au><au>Hui, Xuan</au><au>Shpitser, Ilya</au><au>Siddiqui, Sauleh</au><au>Taylor, Russell H.</au><au>Quon, Harry</au><au>McNutt, Todd</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Advances in radiation oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Radiat Oncol</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>221-230</pages><issn>2452-1094</issn><eissn>2452-1094</eissn><abstract>Radiation-induced xerostomia is one of the most prevalent symptoms during and after head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to discover the spatial radiation dose-based (voxel dose) importance pattern in the major salivary glands in relation to the recovery of xerostomia 18 months after RT, and to compare the recovery voxel dose importance pattern to the acute incidence (injury) pattern. This study included all patients within our database with xerostomia outcomes after completion of curative intensity modulated RT. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events xerostomia grade was used to define recovered versus nonrecovered group at baseline, between end of treatment and 18 months post-RT, and beyond 18 months, respectively. Ridge logistic regression was performed to predict the probability of xerostomia recovery. Voxel doses within geometrically defined parotid glands (PG) and submandibular glands (SMG), demographic characteristics, and clinical factors were included in the algorithm. We plotted the normalized learned weights on the 3-dimensional PG and SMG structures to visualize the voxel dose importance for predicting xerostomia recovery. A total of 146 head and neck cancer patients from 2008 to 2016 were identified. The superior region of the ipsilateral and contralateral PG was the most influencial for xerostomia recovery. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation for ridge logistic regression was 0.68 ± 0.07. Compared with injury, the recovery voxel dose importance pattern was more symmetrical and was influenced by lower dose voxels. The superior portion of the 2 PGs (low dose region) are the most influential on xerostomia recovery and seem to be equal in their contribution. The dissimilarity of the influence pattern between injury and recovery suggests different underlying mechanisms. The importance pattern identified by spatial radiation dose and machine learning methods can improve our understanding of normal tissue toxicities in RT. Further external validation is warranted.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32280822</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.009</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2466-8924</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2571-7326</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4230-9001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-9057</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9437-1413</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3754-3781</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-4329</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2452-1094
ispartof Advances in radiation oncology, 2020-03, Vol.5 (2), p.221-230
issn 2452-1094
2452-1094
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c144a6afbcc242b0adffae5ce5749778
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Head and Neck Cancer
title Spatial Radiation Dose Influence on Xerostomia Recovery and Its Comparison to Acute Incidence in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A57%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spatial%20Radiation%20Dose%20Influence%20on%20Xerostomia%20Recovery%20and%20Its%20Comparison%20to%20Acute%20Incidence%20in%20Patients%20With%20Head%20and%20Neck%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20radiation%20oncology&rft.au=Guo,%20Yue&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=221-230&rft.issn=2452-1094&rft.eissn=2452-1094&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2389211737%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b9e90dce38d7ff37a7eb8d73707455c7b85cfda00ad9c7960f1055c1f74321d03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2389211737&rft_id=info:pmid/32280822&rfr_iscdi=true