Loading…

Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives

There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, mod...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in oncology 2019-08, Vol.9, p.699-699
Main Authors: Romano, Alessandra, Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto, Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura, Conticello, Concetta, Martello, Marina, Terragna, Carolina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3
container_end_page 699
container_issue
container_start_page 699
container_title Frontiers in oncology
container_volume 9
creator Romano, Alessandra
Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto
Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura
Conticello, Concetta
Martello, Marina
Terragna, Carolina
description There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fonc.2019.00699
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c14d70f7b0e7430e93311b804b9d8e01</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c14d70f7b0e7430e93311b804b9d8e01</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2284560674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSNTvkJQuS-jX2mAVSGihUagTiIdhZHs914soZB3smqH-jv7hOUqrWG1_de_wd6-pU1WuCp4w16szF3k4pJmqKsVDqWXVMKeMTxdmf54_qo-o052tcjqgxwexldcQIbygW5Li6Xfjer01A3yH7bizFR5_BZECznCHnNfQD-u2Hle_RsAJ0HntAC5NS_IeiQ4sxDH4TSusGQlyb92hWSFsP--ncbMEM-R2ah-JiC_yHX_belbK3gEzfoYtxGBOgb5DyBuzgt5BfVS-cCRlO7--T6tfFp5_zL5Orr58v57Oria1pPUysskIa19YSt6IVAhy0GMDVzPGOgsWYENoKzCgoJ6VkLQUniVGtAGqVYSfV5YHbRXOtN6msId3oaLzeN2JaapMGbwNoS3gnsZPFQHKGQTFGSNtg3qquAUwK68OBtRnbNXS2bC2Z8AT6dNL7lV7GrRaSYF7zAnh7D0jx7wh50GufLYRgeohj1pQ2vBZYyJ307CC1KeacwD3YEKx3wdC7YOhdMPQ-GOXFm8e_e9D_jwG7AwT7t14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284560674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Romano, Alessandra ; Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto ; Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura ; Conticello, Concetta ; Martello, Marina ; Terragna, Carolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Romano, Alessandra ; Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto ; Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura ; Conticello, Concetta ; Martello, Marina ; Terragna, Carolina</creatorcontrib><description>There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00699</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31482061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>flow cytometry ; liquid biopsy ; minimal residual disease ; multiple myeloma ; NGS ; Oncology</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in oncology, 2019-08, Vol.9, p.699-699</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Romano, Palumbo, Parrinello, Conticello, Martello and Terragna. 2019 Romano, Palumbo, Parrinello, Conticello, Martello and Terragna</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710454/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710454/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romano, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conticello, Concetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martello, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terragna, Carolina</creatorcontrib><title>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</title><title>Frontiers in oncology</title><addtitle>Front Oncol</addtitle><description>There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.</description><subject>flow cytometry</subject><subject>liquid biopsy</subject><subject>minimal residual disease</subject><subject>multiple myeloma</subject><subject>NGS</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><issn>2234-943X</issn><issn>2234-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSNTvkJQuS-jX2mAVSGihUagTiIdhZHs914soZB3smqH-jv7hOUqrWG1_de_wd6-pU1WuCp4w16szF3k4pJmqKsVDqWXVMKeMTxdmf54_qo-o052tcjqgxwexldcQIbygW5Li6Xfjer01A3yH7bizFR5_BZECznCHnNfQD-u2Hle_RsAJ0HntAC5NS_IeiQ4sxDH4TSusGQlyb92hWSFsP--ncbMEM-R2ah-JiC_yHX_belbK3gEzfoYtxGBOgb5DyBuzgt5BfVS-cCRlO7--T6tfFp5_zL5Orr58v57Oria1pPUysskIa19YSt6IVAhy0GMDVzPGOgsWYENoKzCgoJ6VkLQUniVGtAGqVYSfV5YHbRXOtN6msId3oaLzeN2JaapMGbwNoS3gnsZPFQHKGQTFGSNtg3qquAUwK68OBtRnbNXS2bC2Z8AT6dNL7lV7GrRaSYF7zAnh7D0jx7wh50GufLYRgeohj1pQ2vBZYyJ307CC1KeacwD3YEKx3wdC7YOhdMPQ-GOXFm8e_e9D_jwG7AwT7t14</recordid><startdate>20190820</startdate><enddate>20190820</enddate><creator>Romano, Alessandra</creator><creator>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</creator><creator>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</creator><creator>Conticello, Concetta</creator><creator>Martello, Marina</creator><creator>Terragna, Carolina</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190820</creationdate><title>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</title><author>Romano, Alessandra ; Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto ; Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura ; Conticello, Concetta ; Martello, Marina ; Terragna, Carolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>flow cytometry</topic><topic>liquid biopsy</topic><topic>minimal residual disease</topic><topic>multiple myeloma</topic><topic>NGS</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romano, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conticello, Concetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martello, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terragna, Carolina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romano, Alessandra</au><au>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</au><au>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</au><au>Conticello, Concetta</au><au>Martello, Marina</au><au>Terragna, Carolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-08-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>699</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>699-699</pages><issn>2234-943X</issn><eissn>2234-943X</eissn><abstract>There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>31482061</pmid><doi>10.3389/fonc.2019.00699</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-943X
ispartof Frontiers in oncology, 2019-08, Vol.9, p.699-699
issn 2234-943X
2234-943X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c14d70f7b0e7430e93311b804b9d8e01
source PubMed Central
subjects flow cytometry
liquid biopsy
minimal residual disease
multiple myeloma
NGS
Oncology
title Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A16%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimal%20Residual%20Disease%20Assessment%20Within%20the%20Bone%20Marrow%20of%20Multiple%20Myeloma:%20A%20Review%20of%20Caveats,%20Clinical%20Significance%20and%20Future%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20oncology&rft.au=Romano,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2019-08-20&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=699-699&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fonc.2019.00699&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2284560674%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284560674&rft_id=info:pmid/31482061&rfr_iscdi=true