Loading…
Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives
There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, mod...
Saved in:
Published in: | Frontiers in oncology 2019-08, Vol.9, p.699-699 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3 |
container_end_page | 699 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 699 |
container_title | Frontiers in oncology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Romano, Alessandra Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura Conticello, Concetta Martello, Marina Terragna, Carolina |
description | There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00699 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c14d70f7b0e7430e93311b804b9d8e01</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c14d70f7b0e7430e93311b804b9d8e01</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2284560674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSNTvkJQuS-jX2mAVSGihUagTiIdhZHs914soZB3smqH-jv7hOUqrWG1_de_wd6-pU1WuCp4w16szF3k4pJmqKsVDqWXVMKeMTxdmf54_qo-o052tcjqgxwexldcQIbygW5Li6Xfjer01A3yH7bizFR5_BZECznCHnNfQD-u2Hle_RsAJ0HntAC5NS_IeiQ4sxDH4TSusGQlyb92hWSFsP--ncbMEM-R2ah-JiC_yHX_belbK3gEzfoYtxGBOgb5DyBuzgt5BfVS-cCRlO7--T6tfFp5_zL5Orr58v57Oria1pPUysskIa19YSt6IVAhy0GMDVzPGOgsWYENoKzCgoJ6VkLQUniVGtAGqVYSfV5YHbRXOtN6msId3oaLzeN2JaapMGbwNoS3gnsZPFQHKGQTFGSNtg3qquAUwK68OBtRnbNXS2bC2Z8AT6dNL7lV7GrRaSYF7zAnh7D0jx7wh50GufLYRgeohj1pQ2vBZYyJ307CC1KeacwD3YEKx3wdC7YOhdMPQ-GOXFm8e_e9D_jwG7AwT7t14</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2284560674</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Romano, Alessandra ; Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto ; Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura ; Conticello, Concetta ; Martello, Marina ; Terragna, Carolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Romano, Alessandra ; Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto ; Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura ; Conticello, Concetta ; Martello, Marina ; Terragna, Carolina</creatorcontrib><description>There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00699</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31482061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>flow cytometry ; liquid biopsy ; minimal residual disease ; multiple myeloma ; NGS ; Oncology</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in oncology, 2019-08, Vol.9, p.699-699</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Romano, Palumbo, Parrinello, Conticello, Martello and Terragna. 2019 Romano, Palumbo, Parrinello, Conticello, Martello and Terragna</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710454/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6710454/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,27905,27906,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31482061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romano, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conticello, Concetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martello, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terragna, Carolina</creatorcontrib><title>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</title><title>Frontiers in oncology</title><addtitle>Front Oncol</addtitle><description>There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.</description><subject>flow cytometry</subject><subject>liquid biopsy</subject><subject>minimal residual disease</subject><subject>multiple myeloma</subject><subject>NGS</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><issn>2234-943X</issn><issn>2234-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkktvEzEUhUcIRKvSNTvkJQuS-jX2mAVSGihUagTiIdhZHs914soZB3smqH-jv7hOUqrWG1_de_wd6-pU1WuCp4w16szF3k4pJmqKsVDqWXVMKeMTxdmf54_qo-o052tcjqgxwexldcQIbygW5Li6Xfjer01A3yH7bizFR5_BZECznCHnNfQD-u2Hle_RsAJ0HntAC5NS_IeiQ4sxDH4TSusGQlyb92hWSFsP--ncbMEM-R2ah-JiC_yHX_belbK3gEzfoYtxGBOgb5DyBuzgt5BfVS-cCRlO7--T6tfFp5_zL5Orr58v57Oria1pPUysskIa19YSt6IVAhy0GMDVzPGOgsWYENoKzCgoJ6VkLQUniVGtAGqVYSfV5YHbRXOtN6msId3oaLzeN2JaapMGbwNoS3gnsZPFQHKGQTFGSNtg3qquAUwK68OBtRnbNXS2bC2Z8AT6dNL7lV7GrRaSYF7zAnh7D0jx7wh50GufLYRgeohj1pQ2vBZYyJ307CC1KeacwD3YEKx3wdC7YOhdMPQ-GOXFm8e_e9D_jwG7AwT7t14</recordid><startdate>20190820</startdate><enddate>20190820</enddate><creator>Romano, Alessandra</creator><creator>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</creator><creator>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</creator><creator>Conticello, Concetta</creator><creator>Martello, Marina</creator><creator>Terragna, Carolina</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190820</creationdate><title>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</title><author>Romano, Alessandra ; Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto ; Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura ; Conticello, Concetta ; Martello, Marina ; Terragna, Carolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>flow cytometry</topic><topic>liquid biopsy</topic><topic>minimal residual disease</topic><topic>multiple myeloma</topic><topic>NGS</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romano, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conticello, Concetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martello, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terragna, Carolina</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romano, Alessandra</au><au>Palumbo, Giuseppe Alberto</au><au>Parrinello, Nunziatina Laura</au><au>Conticello, Concetta</au><au>Martello, Marina</au><au>Terragna, Carolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Front Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-08-20</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>9</volume><spage>699</spage><epage>699</epage><pages>699-699</pages><issn>2234-943X</issn><eissn>2234-943X</eissn><abstract>There is an increasing clinical interest in the measure and achievement of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in the bone marrow of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients, as defined equally either by Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC) or by Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies. At present, modern technologies allow to detect up to one on 104 or on 105 or even on 106 cells, depending on their throughput. MFC approaches, which have been progressively improved up to the so-called Next Generation Flow (NGF), and NGS, which proved clear advantages over ASO-PCR, can detect very low levels of residual disease in the BM. These methods are actually almost superimposable, in terms of MRD detection power, supporting the lack of unanimous preference for either technique on basis of local availability. However, some technical issues are still open: the optimal assay to use to detect either phenotype (e.g., next generation multidimensional flow cytometry, imaging) or genotype aberrations (e.g., ASO-RQ PCR, digital droplet PCR, NGS) and their standardization, the sample source (BM or peripheral blood, PB) and its pre-processing (red-cell lysis vs. Ficoll, fresh vs. frozen samples, requirement of CD138+ cells enrichment). Overall, MRD negativity is considered as the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes in MM and is likely to represent the major driver of treatment strategies in the near future. In this manuscript, we reviewed the main pitfalls and caveats of MRD detection within bone marrow in MM patients after front-line therapy, highlighting the improving of the currently employed technology and describing alternative methods for MRD testing in MM, such as liquid biopsy.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><pmid>31482061</pmid><doi>10.3389/fonc.2019.00699</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2234-943X |
ispartof | Frontiers in oncology, 2019-08, Vol.9, p.699-699 |
issn | 2234-943X 2234-943X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c14d70f7b0e7430e93311b804b9d8e01 |
source | PubMed Central |
subjects | flow cytometry liquid biopsy minimal residual disease multiple myeloma NGS Oncology |
title | Minimal Residual Disease Assessment Within the Bone Marrow of Multiple Myeloma: A Review of Caveats, Clinical Significance and Future Perspectives |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A16%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimal%20Residual%20Disease%20Assessment%20Within%20the%20Bone%20Marrow%20of%20Multiple%20Myeloma:%20A%20Review%20of%20Caveats,%20Clinical%20Significance%20and%20Future%20Perspectives&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20oncology&rft.au=Romano,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2019-08-20&rft.volume=9&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=699&rft.pages=699-699&rft.issn=2234-943X&rft.eissn=2234-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fonc.2019.00699&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2284560674%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c525t-c9c67afb570b6b66efeb0eef53f4d2ec00112b6032e9f7773b2ef71a9b6e2c9a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2284560674&rft_id=info:pmid/31482061&rfr_iscdi=true |