Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Physiological Variables Monitored During Treadmill Testing

To examine the influence of menstrual cycle (MC) and hormonal contraceptive (HC) cycle phases on physiological variables monitored during incremental treadmill testing in physically active women (eumenorrheic, EUM = 16 and monophasic HC-users, CHC = 12). Four running tests to exhaustion were perform...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in physiology 2021-12, Vol.12, p.761760-761760
Main Authors: Taipale-Mikkonen, Ritva S, Raitanen, Anna, Hackney, Anthony C, Solli, Guro Strøm, Valtonen, Maarit, Peltonen, Heikki, McGawley, Kerry, Kyröläinen, Heikki, Ihalainen, Johanna K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
aerobic testing
endurance testing
female physiology
hormonal contraceptives
menstrual cycle
Physiology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To examine the influence of menstrual cycle (MC) and hormonal contraceptive (HC) cycle phases on physiological variables monitored during incremental treadmill testing in physically active women (eumenorrheic, EUM = 16 and monophasic HC-users, CHC = 12). Four running tests to exhaustion were performed at bleeding, mid follicular (mid FOL)/active 1, ovulation/active 2, and mid luteal (mid LUT)/inactive. HC and MC phases were confirmed from serum hormones. Heart rate (HR), blood lactate (Bla), and O were monitored, while aerobic (AerT) and anaerobic (AnaT) thresholds were determined. O , maximal running speed (RUN ), and total running time (RUN ) were recorded. No significant changes were observed in O or Bla at AerT or AnaT across phases in either group. At maximal effort, absolute and relative O , RUN , and RUN remained stable across phases in both groups. No significant fluctuations in HR were observed across phases, but HR at both AerT and AnaT tended to be lower in EUM than in CHC across phases. Hormonal fluctuations over the MC and HC do not systematically influence physiological variables monitored during incremental treadmill testing. Between group differences in HR at AerT and AnaT underline why HR-based training should be prescribed individually, while recording of MC or HC use when testing should be encouraged as phase may explain minor, but possibly meaningful, changes in, e.g., Bla concentrations or differences in HR response.
ISSN:1664-042X
1664-042X
DOI:10.3389/fphys.2021.761760