Loading…
Functional Characterization of the Oxantel-Sensitive Acetylcholine Receptor from Trichuris muris
The human whipworm, , is estimated to infect 289.6 million people globally. Control of human trichuriasis is a particular challenge, as most anthelmintics have a limited single-dose efficacy, with the striking exception of the narrow-spectrum anthelmintic, oxantel. We recently identified a novel ACR...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2021-07, Vol.14 (7), p.698 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The human whipworm,
, is estimated to infect 289.6 million people globally. Control of human trichuriasis is a particular challenge, as most anthelmintics have a limited single-dose efficacy, with the striking exception of the narrow-spectrum anthelmintic, oxantel. We recently identified a novel ACR-16-like subunit from the pig whipworm,
which gave rise to a functional acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) preferentially activated by oxantel. However, there is no ion channel described in the mouse model parasite
so far. Here, we have identified the ACR-16-like and ACR-19 subunits from
, and performed the functional characterization of the receptors in
oocytes using two-electrode voltage-clamp electrophysiology. We found that the ACR-16-like subunit from
formed a homomeric receptor gated by acetylcholine whereas the ACR-19 failed to create a functional channel. The subsequent pharmacological analysis of the
-ACR-16-like receptor revealed that acetylcholine and oxantel were equally potent. The
-ACR-16-like was more responsive to the toxic agonist epibatidine, but insensitive to pyrantel, in contrast to the
-ACR-16-like receptor. These findings confirm that the ACR-16-like nAChR from
spp. is a preferential drug target for oxantel, and highlights the pharmacological difference between
species. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1424-8247 1424-8247 |
DOI: | 10.3390/ph14070698 |