Loading…
Situational factors affecting abstinence from drugs: Panel data analysis of patients with drug use disorders in residential drug use treatment
Aim To identify situational factors that can predict drug abstention in patients with drug use disorders undergoing residential drug use treatment. Methods Patients with drug use disorders admitted to drug addiction rehabilitation centers (DARCs) in 2016 were involved in this study. Longitudinal pan...
Saved in:
Published in: | PCN reports 2024-03, Vol.3 (1), p.e174-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5204-8e4d84bc28d8efd2ebf36c90539b1474ca1e07d37bf0ee9a1ab5b0da08eeb0693 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | e174 |
container_title | PCN reports |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Mizuno, Satomi Shimane, Takuya Inoura, Satoshi Matsumoto, Toshihiko |
description | Aim
To identify situational factors that can predict drug abstention in patients with drug use disorders undergoing residential drug use treatment.
Methods
Patients with drug use disorders admitted to drug addiction rehabilitation centers (DARCs) in 2016 were involved in this study. Longitudinal panel data were used, with eight follow‐up surveys over 6 years, approximately every 6 months. Of the 2752 samples from the eight follow‐up surveys, 2293 were analyzed as the complete panel data set. The primary outcome was drug abstention for approximately 6 months. The influences of situational factors during this period on the primary outcome were also assessed using a generalized linear mixed model in which inter‐individual differences were controlled as variable effects.
Results
The use of residential DARCs positively influenced the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79–6.21) when compared to no DARC usage. The cessation of drinking also positively affected the primary outcome (AOR 3.10, 95% CI 1.79–4.62), while employment status (AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.12–4.41) and the cessation of drinking (AOR 4.92, 95% CI 2.77–8.72) positively impacted the primary outcomes of patients not using DARCs.
Conclusion
The use of residential DARCs and the cessation of drinking positively affected drug abstention rates. Employment and the cessation of drinking for patients who were not using the DARCs also had a positive effect. This information will aid in the development of social recovery strategies for people with drug use disorders.
This study involved people with drug use disorders who participated in a 12‐step program managed by recovered drug users in the rehabilitation facility group. We assessed the associations between abstinence from drugs and the status of patients' facility use, living location, employment, receiving welfare, and sobriety. We found that the state of being discharged from facilities negatively influenced abstinence from drugs whereas sobriety positively influenced abstinence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pcn5.174 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c19c36e8c08a493cb822cc16550cf78e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c19c36e8c08a493cb822cc16550cf78e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>3090890893</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5204-8e4d84bc28d8efd2ebf36c90539b1474ca1e07d37bf0ee9a1ab5b0da08eeb0693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kt1qFDEUgAdRbKkFn0AC3ngzNT_zk_FGZNFaKFpQr8OZ5GSbZWayJhnLvoTP3Ey3rq1gCCScfPlykpyieMnoGaOUv93qqT5jbfWkOOZt05W8ruXTB_Oj4jTGDc2obJtGsufFkZCykZWsj4vf31yaITk_wUAs6ORDJGAt6uSmNYE-5hEnjcQGPxIT5nV8R65gwoEYSEAgb9xFF4m3ZJtFOKVIbly6vmPJHJEYF30wmMVuIgGjMxly-bwDkQJCGnP0RfHMwhDx9H48KX58-vh99bm8_Hp-sfpwWeqa06qUWBlZ9ZpLI9Eajr0Vje5oLbqeVW2lgSFtjWh7SxE7YNDXPTVAJWJPm06cFBd7r_GwUdvgRgg75cGpu4APawUhOT2g0qzTokGpqYSqE7qXnGvNmrqm2rYSs-v93rWd-xGNztcIMDySPl6Z3LVa-1-K5Vbxps2GN_eG4H_OGJMaXdQ4DPmZ_RyVoE3bMS44zejrf9CNn0P-g4XqqFy6-CvUwccY0B6yYVQtRaOWolG5aDL66mH2B_BPiWSg3AM3bsDdf0XqavWlXoS3dcTO5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090890893</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Situational factors affecting abstinence from drugs: Panel data analysis of patients with drug use disorders in residential drug use treatment</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Mizuno, Satomi ; Shimane, Takuya ; Inoura, Satoshi ; Matsumoto, Toshihiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Satomi ; Shimane, Takuya ; Inoura, Satoshi ; Matsumoto, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To identify situational factors that can predict drug abstention in patients with drug use disorders undergoing residential drug use treatment.
Methods
Patients with drug use disorders admitted to drug addiction rehabilitation centers (DARCs) in 2016 were involved in this study. Longitudinal panel data were used, with eight follow‐up surveys over 6 years, approximately every 6 months. Of the 2752 samples from the eight follow‐up surveys, 2293 were analyzed as the complete panel data set. The primary outcome was drug abstention for approximately 6 months. The influences of situational factors during this period on the primary outcome were also assessed using a generalized linear mixed model in which inter‐individual differences were controlled as variable effects.
Results
The use of residential DARCs positively influenced the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79–6.21) when compared to no DARC usage. The cessation of drinking also positively affected the primary outcome (AOR 3.10, 95% CI 1.79–4.62), while employment status (AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.12–4.41) and the cessation of drinking (AOR 4.92, 95% CI 2.77–8.72) positively impacted the primary outcomes of patients not using DARCs.
Conclusion
The use of residential DARCs and the cessation of drinking positively affected drug abstention rates. Employment and the cessation of drinking for patients who were not using the DARCs also had a positive effect. This information will aid in the development of social recovery strategies for people with drug use disorders.
This study involved people with drug use disorders who participated in a 12‐step program managed by recovered drug users in the rehabilitation facility group. We assessed the associations between abstinence from drugs and the status of patients' facility use, living location, employment, receiving welfare, and sobriety. We found that the state of being discharged from facilities negatively influenced abstinence from drugs whereas sobriety positively influenced abstinence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2769-2558</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2769-2558</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pcn5.174</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38868485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abstinence ; alcohol drinking ; Consent ; Data analysis ; Drug abuse ; Drug addiction ; drug rehabilitation center ; Drug use ; drug use disorder ; follow‐up study ; Mental disorders ; Original ; Participation ; Patients ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Substance abuse treatment ; Sustainable development ; Variables</subject><ispartof>PCN reports, 2024-03, Vol.3 (1), p.e174-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5204-8e4d84bc28d8efd2ebf36c90539b1474ca1e07d37bf0ee9a1ab5b0da08eeb0693</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8906-6230 ; 0000-0003-0644-1520</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11114267/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3090890893?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,46052,46476,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38868485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Satomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimane, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoura, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><title>Situational factors affecting abstinence from drugs: Panel data analysis of patients with drug use disorders in residential drug use treatment</title><title>PCN reports</title><addtitle>PCN Rep</addtitle><description>Aim
To identify situational factors that can predict drug abstention in patients with drug use disorders undergoing residential drug use treatment.
Methods
Patients with drug use disorders admitted to drug addiction rehabilitation centers (DARCs) in 2016 were involved in this study. Longitudinal panel data were used, with eight follow‐up surveys over 6 years, approximately every 6 months. Of the 2752 samples from the eight follow‐up surveys, 2293 were analyzed as the complete panel data set. The primary outcome was drug abstention for approximately 6 months. The influences of situational factors during this period on the primary outcome were also assessed using a generalized linear mixed model in which inter‐individual differences were controlled as variable effects.
Results
The use of residential DARCs positively influenced the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79–6.21) when compared to no DARC usage. The cessation of drinking also positively affected the primary outcome (AOR 3.10, 95% CI 1.79–4.62), while employment status (AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.12–4.41) and the cessation of drinking (AOR 4.92, 95% CI 2.77–8.72) positively impacted the primary outcomes of patients not using DARCs.
Conclusion
The use of residential DARCs and the cessation of drinking positively affected drug abstention rates. Employment and the cessation of drinking for patients who were not using the DARCs also had a positive effect. This information will aid in the development of social recovery strategies for people with drug use disorders.
This study involved people with drug use disorders who participated in a 12‐step program managed by recovered drug users in the rehabilitation facility group. We assessed the associations between abstinence from drugs and the status of patients' facility use, living location, employment, receiving welfare, and sobriety. We found that the state of being discharged from facilities negatively influenced abstinence from drugs whereas sobriety positively influenced abstinence.</description><subject>Abstinence</subject><subject>alcohol drinking</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug addiction</subject><subject>drug rehabilitation center</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>drug use disorder</subject><subject>follow‐up study</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Substance abuse treatment</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2769-2558</issn><issn>2769-2558</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kt1qFDEUgAdRbKkFn0AC3ngzNT_zk_FGZNFaKFpQr8OZ5GSbZWayJhnLvoTP3Ey3rq1gCCScfPlykpyieMnoGaOUv93qqT5jbfWkOOZt05W8ruXTB_Oj4jTGDc2obJtGsufFkZCykZWsj4vf31yaITk_wUAs6ORDJGAt6uSmNYE-5hEnjcQGPxIT5nV8R65gwoEYSEAgb9xFF4m3ZJtFOKVIbly6vmPJHJEYF30wmMVuIgGjMxly-bwDkQJCGnP0RfHMwhDx9H48KX58-vh99bm8_Hp-sfpwWeqa06qUWBlZ9ZpLI9Eajr0Vje5oLbqeVW2lgSFtjWh7SxE7YNDXPTVAJWJPm06cFBd7r_GwUdvgRgg75cGpu4APawUhOT2g0qzTokGpqYSqE7qXnGvNmrqm2rYSs-v93rWd-xGNztcIMDySPl6Z3LVa-1-K5Vbxps2GN_eG4H_OGJMaXdQ4DPmZ_RyVoE3bMS44zejrf9CNn0P-g4XqqFy6-CvUwccY0B6yYVQtRaOWolG5aDL66mH2B_BPiWSg3AM3bsDdf0XqavWlXoS3dcTO5A</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Mizuno, Satomi</creator><creator>Shimane, Takuya</creator><creator>Inoura, Satoshi</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Toshihiko</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-6230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-1520</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Situational factors affecting abstinence from drugs: Panel data analysis of patients with drug use disorders in residential drug use treatment</title><author>Mizuno, Satomi ; Shimane, Takuya ; Inoura, Satoshi ; Matsumoto, Toshihiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5204-8e4d84bc28d8efd2ebf36c90539b1474ca1e07d37bf0ee9a1ab5b0da08eeb0693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abstinence</topic><topic>alcohol drinking</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug addiction</topic><topic>drug rehabilitation center</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>drug use disorder</topic><topic>follow‐up study</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Substance abuse treatment</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Satomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimane, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inoura, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Toshihiko</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Open Access: DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PCN reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mizuno, Satomi</au><au>Shimane, Takuya</au><au>Inoura, Satoshi</au><au>Matsumoto, Toshihiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Situational factors affecting abstinence from drugs: Panel data analysis of patients with drug use disorders in residential drug use treatment</atitle><jtitle>PCN reports</jtitle><addtitle>PCN Rep</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e174</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e174-n/a</pages><issn>2769-2558</issn><eissn>2769-2558</eissn><abstract>Aim
To identify situational factors that can predict drug abstention in patients with drug use disorders undergoing residential drug use treatment.
Methods
Patients with drug use disorders admitted to drug addiction rehabilitation centers (DARCs) in 2016 were involved in this study. Longitudinal panel data were used, with eight follow‐up surveys over 6 years, approximately every 6 months. Of the 2752 samples from the eight follow‐up surveys, 2293 were analyzed as the complete panel data set. The primary outcome was drug abstention for approximately 6 months. The influences of situational factors during this period on the primary outcome were also assessed using a generalized linear mixed model in which inter‐individual differences were controlled as variable effects.
Results
The use of residential DARCs positively influenced the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.79–6.21) when compared to no DARC usage. The cessation of drinking also positively affected the primary outcome (AOR 3.10, 95% CI 1.79–4.62), while employment status (AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.12–4.41) and the cessation of drinking (AOR 4.92, 95% CI 2.77–8.72) positively impacted the primary outcomes of patients not using DARCs.
Conclusion
The use of residential DARCs and the cessation of drinking positively affected drug abstention rates. Employment and the cessation of drinking for patients who were not using the DARCs also had a positive effect. This information will aid in the development of social recovery strategies for people with drug use disorders.
This study involved people with drug use disorders who participated in a 12‐step program managed by recovered drug users in the rehabilitation facility group. We assessed the associations between abstinence from drugs and the status of patients' facility use, living location, employment, receiving welfare, and sobriety. We found that the state of being discharged from facilities negatively influenced abstinence from drugs whereas sobriety positively influenced abstinence.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38868485</pmid><doi>10.1002/pcn5.174</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8906-6230</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-1520</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2769-2558 |
ispartof | PCN reports, 2024-03, Vol.3 (1), p.e174-n/a |
issn | 2769-2558 2769-2558 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c19c36e8c08a493cb822cc16550cf78e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Abstinence alcohol drinking Consent Data analysis Drug abuse Drug addiction drug rehabilitation center Drug use drug use disorder follow‐up study Mental disorders Original Participation Patients Questionnaires Rehabilitation Substance abuse treatment Sustainable development Variables |
title | Situational factors affecting abstinence from drugs: Panel data analysis of patients with drug use disorders in residential drug use treatment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A44%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Situational%20factors%20affecting%20abstinence%20from%20drugs:%20Panel%20data%20analysis%20of%20patients%20with%20drug%20use%20disorders%20in%20residential%20drug%20use%20treatment&rft.jtitle=PCN%20reports&rft.au=Mizuno,%20Satomi&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e174&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e174-n/a&rft.issn=2769-2558&rft.eissn=2769-2558&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pcn5.174&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E3090890893%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5204-8e4d84bc28d8efd2ebf36c90539b1474ca1e07d37bf0ee9a1ab5b0da08eeb0693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090890893&rft_id=info:pmid/38868485&rfr_iscdi=true |