Medical students’ experiences of working with simulated patients in challenging communication training

• Published in: Advances in simulation (London) 2022-10, Vol.7 (1), p.1-32, Article 32
• Main Authors: Isaksson, Johan, Krabbe, Julia, Ramklint, Mia
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Active listening; Child & adolescent psychiatry; Communication; Communication skills; Communication skills training; Content analysis; Education; Emotions; Empathy; Feedback; Focus groups; Interviews; Kommunikationsvetenskap; Learning; Medical students; Medicine; Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap; Otolaryngology; Patients; Peers; Psykologi; Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi); Samhällsvetenskap; Sick leave; Simulated patients; Simulation; Standardized patients; Student organizations; Students; Supervisors; Training
• ISSN: 2059-0628; 2059-0628
• DOI: 10.1186/s41077-022-00230-3

Background Physicians’ communication skills are important for patient-centered care. Although working with simulated patients (SPs) in case simulations is common for training communication skills, studies seldom include a wide range of challenging behaviors or explore students’ own experiences of learning communication skills with SPs. Therefore, this study was aimed at investigating how medical students perceive communication training involving challenging consultations with SPs and the impact on their learning experiences. Methods Twenty-three medical students from the same class were interviewed in focus groups about their experiences of simulation training with actors as SPs. In the simulation training, the students were instructed to deliver bad news, manage negative patient reactions, and encourage behavioral changes in reluctant patients. This was followed by feedback and a debriefing exercise. The interviews were analyzed with content analysis. Results Students reported that actors as SPs made the simulations more realistic and enabled them to practice various communication skills for challenging consultations in a safe way and manage their own feelings, thereby promoting new learning experiences. Elements such as actors’ flexibility in changing behaviors during role-play and exposure to different challenging behaviors, like negative emotions, were regarded as valuable. The importance of an accepting and permissive climate for the debriefing exercise was highlighted, though without taking too much time from the simulation training. Feedback directly from the SP was appreciated. Conclusions Actors as SPs were perceived as a valuable part of challenging communication training and added elements to the learning process. Future studies should include a wider range of challenging behaviors in training with SPs and evaluate the effects of such training on students’ use of communication skills.