Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints

The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient ab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Dentistry 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.180-184
Main Authors: Scribante, Andrea, Sfondrini, Maria Francesca, Broggini, Simona, D'Allocco, Marina, Gandini, Paola
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Clinical Study
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483
container_end_page 184
container_issue 2011
container_start_page 180
container_title International Journal of Dentistry
container_volume 2011
creator Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Broggini, Simona
D'Allocco, Marina
Gandini, Paola
description The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2011/548356
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c3bef12676e240c1ba83a55340631a54</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><airiti_id>P20160526004_201112_201702240004_201702240004_180_184</airiti_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c3bef12676e240c1ba83a55340631a54</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>906154145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQQCMEolXpiTPINyRQqL-T5VAJlm2ptAhUQBwt2xl3XWXjxfZS9R_ws3GaZaEncvHYfnrjzExVPSX4NSFCnFBMyIngLRPyQXVIZNvUbcPkw31M24PqOKVrXD5GuCDycXVAKSnhrDmsfi2c81bbWxQcWqS8guwtuoSs_QAxvUHz3g8F6NE8rDc6-hQGZCDfAAzo47bPPuWohw469N1HSKjE6H2JbK7fhRKf9zoldOYNxPoS_OBCtAUebSH5DOjLpmTI6Un1yOk-wfFuPaq-nS2-zj_Uy0_nF_O3y1qLhuaaMjPjxo2P71pNLXai61zDYQYcHO0IM64x3BrbauBGasxsY5qmg5k1ptTpqLqYvF3Q12oT_VrHWxW0V3cHIV4pHUsNelCWGXCEykYC5dgSo1umhWAcS0a04MV1Ork2W7OGzsJQatHfk96_GfxKXYWfilEspCRF8GIniOHHFlJWa58s9L0eIGyTmmFJBC-tKuSribQxpBTB7bMQrMZJUOMkqGkSCv3834ft2T99L8DLCVj5odM3_j-2ZxMMBQGn9zBvsRDjXyyne-2jz15dh20cSg_V52KRWFCJMb8zEjouDaalnruzvxvSltwtZ78BGmDb9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>906154145</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Scribante, Andrea ; Sfondrini, Maria Francesca ; Broggini, Simona ; D'Allocco, Marina ; Gandini, Paola</creator><contributor>Ariji, Eiichiro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Scribante, Andrea ; Sfondrini, Maria Francesca ; Broggini, Simona ; D'Allocco, Marina ; Gandini, Paola ; Ariji, Eiichiro</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1687-8728</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1687-8736</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2011/548356</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22114597</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cairo, Egypt: Hindawi Limiteds</publisher><subject>Clinical Study</subject><ispartof>International Journal of Dentistry, 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.180-184</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Andrea Scribante et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Andrea Scribante et al. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3445-3289 ; 0000-0002-2760-0124</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205661/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3205661/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,37013,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22114597$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ariji, Eiichiro</contributor><creatorcontrib>Scribante, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sfondrini, Maria Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broggini, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Allocco, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandini, Paola</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints</title><title>International Journal of Dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Dent</addtitle><description>The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.</description><subject>Clinical Study</subject><issn>1687-8728</issn><issn>1687-8736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1v1DAQQCMEolXpiTPINyRQqL-T5VAJlm2ptAhUQBwt2xl3XWXjxfZS9R_ws3GaZaEncvHYfnrjzExVPSX4NSFCnFBMyIngLRPyQXVIZNvUbcPkw31M24PqOKVrXD5GuCDycXVAKSnhrDmsfi2c81bbWxQcWqS8guwtuoSs_QAxvUHz3g8F6NE8rDc6-hQGZCDfAAzo47bPPuWohw469N1HSKjE6H2JbK7fhRKf9zoldOYNxPoS_OBCtAUebSH5DOjLpmTI6Un1yOk-wfFuPaq-nS2-zj_Uy0_nF_O3y1qLhuaaMjPjxo2P71pNLXai61zDYQYcHO0IM64x3BrbauBGasxsY5qmg5k1ptTpqLqYvF3Q12oT_VrHWxW0V3cHIV4pHUsNelCWGXCEykYC5dgSo1umhWAcS0a04MV1Ork2W7OGzsJQatHfk96_GfxKXYWfilEspCRF8GIniOHHFlJWa58s9L0eIGyTmmFJBC-tKuSribQxpBTB7bMQrMZJUOMkqGkSCv3834ft2T99L8DLCVj5odM3_j-2ZxMMBQGn9zBvsRDjXyyne-2jz15dh20cSg_V52KRWFCJMb8zEjouDaalnruzvxvSltwtZ78BGmDb9Q</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Scribante, Andrea</creator><creator>Sfondrini, Maria Francesca</creator><creator>Broggini, Simona</creator><creator>D'Allocco, Marina</creator><creator>Gandini, Paola</creator><general>Hindawi Limiteds</general><general>Hindawi Puplishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Publishing Corporation</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>188</scope><scope>ADJCN</scope><scope>AHFXO</scope><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-3289</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-0124</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints</title><author>Scribante, Andrea ; Sfondrini, Maria Francesca ; Broggini, Simona ; D'Allocco, Marina ; Gandini, Paola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Clinical Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scribante, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sfondrini, Maria Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broggini, Simona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D'Allocco, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gandini, Paola</creatorcontrib><collection>Airiti Library</collection><collection>الدوريات العلمية والإحصائية - e-Marefa Academic and Statistical Periodicals</collection><collection>معرفة - المحتوى العربي الأكاديمي المتكامل - e-Marefa Academic Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International Journal of Dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scribante, Andrea</au><au>Sfondrini, Maria Francesca</au><au>Broggini, Simona</au><au>D'Allocco, Marina</au><au>Gandini, Paola</au><au>Ariji, Eiichiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints</atitle><jtitle>International Journal of Dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Dent</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>2011</volume><issue>2011</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>180-184</pages><issn>1687-8728</issn><eissn>1687-8736</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.</abstract><cop>Cairo, Egypt</cop><pub>Hindawi Limiteds</pub><pmid>22114597</pmid><doi>10.1155/2011/548356</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3445-3289</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2760-0124</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1687-8728
ispartof International Journal of Dentistry, 2011-01, Vol.2011 (2011), p.180-184
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c3bef12676e240c1ba83a55340631a54
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Clinical Study
title Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A43%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20Esthetic%20Retainers:%20Clinical%20Comparison%20between%20Multistranded%20Wires%20and%20Direct-Bond%20Glass%20Fiber-Reinforced%20Composite%20Splints&rft.jtitle=International%20Journal%20of%20Dentistry&rft.au=Scribante,%20Andrea&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=2011&rft.issue=2011&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=180-184&rft.issn=1687-8728&rft.eissn=1687-8736&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2011/548356&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E906154145%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a572t-23b94bf4597d8a2c0f5ddf74e9e4ef2d13bf7b4cbc8ae4b6a03c7b77de9cbb483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=906154145&rft_id=info:pmid/22114597&rft_airiti_id=P20160526004_201112_201702240004_201702240004_180_184&rfr_iscdi=true