Loading…

Myths in magnetosensation

The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:iScience 2022-06, Vol.25 (6), p.104454-104454, Article 104454
Main Authors: Nimpf, Simon, Keays, David A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3
container_end_page 104454
container_issue 6
container_start_page 104454
container_title iScience
container_volume 25
creator Nimpf, Simon
Keays, David A.
description The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained unresolved. Consequently, this has given rise to a series of beliefs that are critically analyzed in this manuscript. We address six assertions: (1) Magnetoreception does not exist; (2) It has to be magnetite; (3) Birds have a conserved six loci magnetic sense system in their upper beak; (4) It has to be cryptochrome; (5) MagR is a protein biocompass; and (6) The electromagnetic induction hypothesis is dead. In advancing counter-arguments for these beliefs, we hope to stimulate debate, new ideas, and the design of well-controlled experiments that can aid our understanding of this fascinating biological phenomenon. [Display omitted] Biological science, ethology, zoology, physiology
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c40b2925a8bc4989a42347e34c97b6fa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2589004222007258</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c40b2925a8bc4989a42347e34c97b6fa</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2674752682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1paUKaH9AeSo697EYaj76gFEroRyCll_YsxvJ4o8VrpZI3kH9fbZ2G5BIYkBi984x436Z5J8VaCqnPt-tYQlyDAKgNRIUvmmNQ1q2EQHj56H7UnJayFUJALXT6dXPUKm2MRnvcvP1xN1-Xszid7Wgz8ZwKT4XmmKY3zauBxsKn9-dJ8_vrl18X31dXP79dXny-WgUFcl51OrSD6BCwJaeRJRllBUsEUoJMr20tNVBH5JgRgW0HEBCs0y2Jvj1pLhdun2jrb3LcUb7ziaL_10h54ynPMYzsA4oOHCiyXUBnHSG0aLjF4EynB6qsTwvrZt_tuA88zZnGJ9CnL1O89pt0653UxhlZAR_uATn92XOZ_a7azONIE6d98aANGgXaQpXCIg05lZJ5eFgjhT9E5Lf-EJE_ROSXiOrQ-8cffBj5H0gVfFwEXC2_jZx9RfAUuI-Zw1w9ic_x_wKXeaCl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2674752682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Myths in magnetosensation</title><source>NCBI_PubMed Central(免费)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Nimpf, Simon ; Keays, David A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nimpf, Simon ; Keays, David A.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained unresolved. Consequently, this has given rise to a series of beliefs that are critically analyzed in this manuscript. We address six assertions: (1) Magnetoreception does not exist; (2) It has to be magnetite; (3) Birds have a conserved six loci magnetic sense system in their upper beak; (4) It has to be cryptochrome; (5) MagR is a protein biocompass; and (6) The electromagnetic induction hypothesis is dead. In advancing counter-arguments for these beliefs, we hope to stimulate debate, new ideas, and the design of well-controlled experiments that can aid our understanding of this fascinating biological phenomenon. [Display omitted] Biological science, ethology, zoology, physiology</description><identifier>ISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2589-0042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35677648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological science ; ethology ; physiology ; Review ; zoology</subject><ispartof>iScience, 2022-06, Vol.25 (6), p.104454-104454, Article 104454</ispartof><rights>2022 The Authors</rights><rights>2022 The Authors.</rights><rights>2022 The Authors 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8343-8002</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9167971/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589004222007258$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,3549,27924,27925,45780,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35677648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nimpf, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keays, David A.</creatorcontrib><title>Myths in magnetosensation</title><title>iScience</title><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><description>The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained unresolved. Consequently, this has given rise to a series of beliefs that are critically analyzed in this manuscript. We address six assertions: (1) Magnetoreception does not exist; (2) It has to be magnetite; (3) Birds have a conserved six loci magnetic sense system in their upper beak; (4) It has to be cryptochrome; (5) MagR is a protein biocompass; and (6) The electromagnetic induction hypothesis is dead. In advancing counter-arguments for these beliefs, we hope to stimulate debate, new ideas, and the design of well-controlled experiments that can aid our understanding of this fascinating biological phenomenon. [Display omitted] Biological science, ethology, zoology, physiology</description><subject>Biological science</subject><subject>ethology</subject><subject>physiology</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>zoology</subject><issn>2589-0042</issn><issn>2589-0042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhk1paUKaH9AeSo697EYaj76gFEroRyCll_YsxvJ4o8VrpZI3kH9fbZ2G5BIYkBi984x436Z5J8VaCqnPt-tYQlyDAKgNRIUvmmNQ1q2EQHj56H7UnJayFUJALXT6dXPUKm2MRnvcvP1xN1-Xszid7Wgz8ZwKT4XmmKY3zauBxsKn9-dJ8_vrl18X31dXP79dXny-WgUFcl51OrSD6BCwJaeRJRllBUsEUoJMr20tNVBH5JgRgW0HEBCs0y2Jvj1pLhdun2jrb3LcUb7ziaL_10h54ynPMYzsA4oOHCiyXUBnHSG0aLjF4EynB6qsTwvrZt_tuA88zZnGJ9CnL1O89pt0653UxhlZAR_uATn92XOZ_a7azONIE6d98aANGgXaQpXCIg05lZJ5eFgjhT9E5Lf-EJE_ROSXiOrQ-8cffBj5H0gVfFwEXC2_jZx9RfAUuI-Zw1w9ic_x_wKXeaCl</recordid><startdate>20220617</startdate><enddate>20220617</enddate><creator>Nimpf, Simon</creator><creator>Keays, David A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-8002</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220617</creationdate><title>Myths in magnetosensation</title><author>Nimpf, Simon ; Keays, David A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Biological science</topic><topic>ethology</topic><topic>physiology</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nimpf, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keays, David A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>iScience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nimpf, Simon</au><au>Keays, David A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Myths in magnetosensation</atitle><jtitle>iScience</jtitle><addtitle>iScience</addtitle><date>2022-06-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>104454</spage><epage>104454</epage><pages>104454-104454</pages><artnum>104454</artnum><issn>2589-0042</issn><eissn>2589-0042</eissn><abstract>The ability to detect magnetic fields is a sensory modality that is used by many animals to navigate. While first postulated in the 1800s, for decades, it was considered a biological myth. A series of elegant behavioral experiments in the 1960s and 1970s showed conclusively that the sense is real; however, the underlying mechanism(s) remained unresolved. Consequently, this has given rise to a series of beliefs that are critically analyzed in this manuscript. We address six assertions: (1) Magnetoreception does not exist; (2) It has to be magnetite; (3) Birds have a conserved six loci magnetic sense system in their upper beak; (4) It has to be cryptochrome; (5) MagR is a protein biocompass; and (6) The electromagnetic induction hypothesis is dead. In advancing counter-arguments for these beliefs, we hope to stimulate debate, new ideas, and the design of well-controlled experiments that can aid our understanding of this fascinating biological phenomenon. [Display omitted] Biological science, ethology, zoology, physiology</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>35677648</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8343-8002</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2589-0042
ispartof iScience, 2022-06, Vol.25 (6), p.104454-104454, Article 104454
issn 2589-0042
2589-0042
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c40b2925a8bc4989a42347e34c97b6fa
source NCBI_PubMed Central(免费); ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological science
ethology
physiology
Review
zoology
title Myths in magnetosensation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A51%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Myths%20in%20magnetosensation&rft.jtitle=iScience&rft.au=Nimpf,%20Simon&rft.date=2022-06-17&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=104454&rft.epage=104454&rft.pages=104454-104454&rft.artnum=104454&rft.issn=2589-0042&rft.eissn=2589-0042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104454&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2674752682%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c521t-b6c3f0b4243a964e1a7580e142a50a7d68d685fabaa9ee442e8b22c428963a0d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2674752682&rft_id=info:pmid/35677648&rfr_iscdi=true