Loading…
Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included....
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of ophthalmology 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1), p.8833830 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8833830 |
container_title | Journal of ophthalmology |
container_volume | 2025 |
creator | Peyman, Alireza Irajpour, Matin Yazdi, Maryam Dehghanian, Farzaneh Noorshargh, Pegah Broumand, Yasaman Fatemi, Farnaz Pourazizi, Mohsen |
description | To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review.
Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders.
A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (
= -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07).
Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1155/joph/8833830 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c450fd5c926b48e996d2d2fe950b1a22</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A824153928</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c450fd5c926b48e996d2d2fe950b1a22</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A824153928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9rFDEQxxdRbKl981kWBPHBa_Njk018KcthtXAiahXfQjaZ3OXY25zJbsv99-Z659ETE0iGyWe-SWamKF5idIExY5fLsF5cCkGpoOhJcUqQRBOEmHh6sKtfJ8V5SkuUB8UVY-h5cUKlwJyg-rS4_Trqzg-bMrhy5h2UjRsgljOd8vrTJx_6chpiBDNk833ZlN83aYCVHrwpv8Gdh_tS97b8DIOeNL3uNsmnF8Uzp7sE5_v9rPhx_eF2-mky-_LxZtrMJqbi1TCR1jFOGbfMSgeiBWkRYYbXiDiNWs2JoTVvsdGICGfaWgpZt6bF2DLKtKBnxc1O1wa9VOvoVzpuVNBePThCnCsd80M7UKZiyFlmJOFtJUBKboklDiRDLdaEZK2rndZ6bFdgDfRD1N2R6PFJ7xdqHu4UxjVFCPOs8HavEMPvEdKgVj4Z6DrdQxiTophxRupaVhl9_Q-6DGPM2XugakSJyNU6UHOdf-B7F_LFZiuqGkEqzKgk2yRc_IfK08LKm9CD89l_FPDmUcACdDcsUujGbYHTMfhuB5oYUorgDtnASG3bT23bT-3bL-OvHmfwAP9tNvoHs27Spw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3157032800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access Titles</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Peyman, Alireza ; Irajpour, Matin ; Yazdi, Maryam ; Dehghanian, Farzaneh ; Noorshargh, Pegah ; Broumand, Yasaman ; Fatemi, Farnaz ; Pourazizi, Mohsen</creator><contributor>Taneri, Suphi ; Suphi Taneri</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peyman, Alireza ; Irajpour, Matin ; Yazdi, Maryam ; Dehghanian, Farzaneh ; Noorshargh, Pegah ; Broumand, Yasaman ; Fatemi, Farnaz ; Pourazizi, Mohsen ; Taneri, Suphi ; Suphi Taneri</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review.
Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders.
A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (
= -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07).
Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/joph/8833830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39816207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cornea ; Cross-sectional studies ; Eye ; Eye surgery ; Lasers ; Lasers in surgery ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Patient satisfaction ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Review ; Surgery ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of ophthalmology, 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1), p.8833830</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2025 Alireza Peyman et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2025 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2025 Alireza Peyman et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2025 Alireza Peyman et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7687-8811 ; 0000-0001-8504-9652 ; 0000-0002-9714-8209 ; 0000-0003-3961-6702</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3157032800/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3157032800?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39816207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Taneri, Suphi</contributor><contributor>Suphi Taneri</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peyman, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irajpour, Matin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorshargh, Pegah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broumand, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemi, Farnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourazizi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review.
Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders.
A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (
= -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07).
Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</description><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lasers in surgery</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2090-004X</issn><issn>2090-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9rFDEQxxdRbKl981kWBPHBa_Njk018KcthtXAiahXfQjaZ3OXY25zJbsv99-Z659ETE0iGyWe-SWamKF5idIExY5fLsF5cCkGpoOhJcUqQRBOEmHh6sKtfJ8V5SkuUB8UVY-h5cUKlwJyg-rS4_Trqzg-bMrhy5h2UjRsgljOd8vrTJx_6chpiBDNk833ZlN83aYCVHrwpv8Gdh_tS97b8DIOeNL3uNsmnF8Uzp7sE5_v9rPhx_eF2-mky-_LxZtrMJqbi1TCR1jFOGbfMSgeiBWkRYYbXiDiNWs2JoTVvsdGICGfaWgpZt6bF2DLKtKBnxc1O1wa9VOvoVzpuVNBePThCnCsd80M7UKZiyFlmJOFtJUBKboklDiRDLdaEZK2rndZ6bFdgDfRD1N2R6PFJ7xdqHu4UxjVFCPOs8HavEMPvEdKgVj4Z6DrdQxiTophxRupaVhl9_Q-6DGPM2XugakSJyNU6UHOdf-B7F_LFZiuqGkEqzKgk2yRc_IfK08LKm9CD89l_FPDmUcACdDcsUujGbYHTMfhuB5oYUorgDtnASG3bT23bT-3bL-OvHmfwAP9tNvoHs27Spw</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Peyman, Alireza</creator><creator>Irajpour, Matin</creator><creator>Yazdi, Maryam</creator><creator>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</creator><creator>Noorshargh, Pegah</creator><creator>Broumand, Yasaman</creator><creator>Fatemi, Farnaz</creator><creator>Pourazizi, Mohsen</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-9652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-8209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-6702</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Peyman, Alireza ; Irajpour, Matin ; Yazdi, Maryam ; Dehghanian, Farzaneh ; Noorshargh, Pegah ; Broumand, Yasaman ; Fatemi, Farnaz ; Pourazizi, Mohsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lasers in surgery</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peyman, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irajpour, Matin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorshargh, Pegah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broumand, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemi, Farnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourazizi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peyman, Alireza</au><au>Irajpour, Matin</au><au>Yazdi, Maryam</au><au>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</au><au>Noorshargh, Pegah</au><au>Broumand, Yasaman</au><au>Fatemi, Farnaz</au><au>Pourazizi, Mohsen</au><au>Taneri, Suphi</au><au>Suphi Taneri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>2025</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8833830</spage><pages>8833830-</pages><issn>2090-004X</issn><eissn>2090-0058</eissn><abstract>To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review.
Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders.
A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (
= -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07).
Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39816207</pmid><doi>10.1155/joph/8833830</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-9652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-8209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-6702</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-004X |
ispartof | Journal of ophthalmology, 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1), p.8833830 |
issn | 2090-004X 2090-0058 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c450fd5c926b48e996d2d2fe950b1a22 |
source | Wiley Online Library Open Access Titles; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central |
subjects | Cornea Cross-sectional studies Eye Eye surgery Lasers Lasers in surgery Medical research Medicine, Experimental Meta-analysis Patient satisfaction Quality of life Questionnaires Review Surgery Systematic review |
title | Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20Life%20After%20Laser%20Vision%20Correction:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Peyman,%20Alireza&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=2025&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8833830&rft.pages=8833830-&rft.issn=2090-004X&rft.eissn=2090-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/joph/8833830&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA824153928%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3157032800&rft_id=info:pmid/39816207&rft_galeid=A824153928&rfr_iscdi=true |