Loading…

Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of ophthalmology 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1), p.8833830
Main Authors: Peyman, Alireza, Irajpour, Matin, Yazdi, Maryam, Dehghanian, Farzaneh, Noorshargh, Pegah, Broumand, Yasaman, Fatemi, Farnaz, Pourazizi, Mohsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 8833830
container_title Journal of ophthalmology
container_volume 2025
creator Peyman, Alireza
Irajpour, Matin
Yazdi, Maryam
Dehghanian, Farzaneh
Noorshargh, Pegah
Broumand, Yasaman
Fatemi, Farnaz
Pourazizi, Mohsen
description To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (  = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/joph/8833830
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c450fd5c926b48e996d2d2fe950b1a22</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A824153928</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c450fd5c926b48e996d2d2fe950b1a22</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A824153928</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9rFDEQxxdRbKl981kWBPHBa_Njk018KcthtXAiahXfQjaZ3OXY25zJbsv99-Z659ETE0iGyWe-SWamKF5idIExY5fLsF5cCkGpoOhJcUqQRBOEmHh6sKtfJ8V5SkuUB8UVY-h5cUKlwJyg-rS4_Trqzg-bMrhy5h2UjRsgljOd8vrTJx_6chpiBDNk833ZlN83aYCVHrwpv8Gdh_tS97b8DIOeNL3uNsmnF8Uzp7sE5_v9rPhx_eF2-mky-_LxZtrMJqbi1TCR1jFOGbfMSgeiBWkRYYbXiDiNWs2JoTVvsdGICGfaWgpZt6bF2DLKtKBnxc1O1wa9VOvoVzpuVNBePThCnCsd80M7UKZiyFlmJOFtJUBKboklDiRDLdaEZK2rndZ6bFdgDfRD1N2R6PFJ7xdqHu4UxjVFCPOs8HavEMPvEdKgVj4Z6DrdQxiTophxRupaVhl9_Q-6DGPM2XugakSJyNU6UHOdf-B7F_LFZiuqGkEqzKgk2yRc_IfK08LKm9CD89l_FPDmUcACdDcsUujGbYHTMfhuB5oYUorgDtnASG3bT23bT-3bL-OvHmfwAP9tNvoHs27Spw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3157032800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access Titles</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Peyman, Alireza ; Irajpour, Matin ; Yazdi, Maryam ; Dehghanian, Farzaneh ; Noorshargh, Pegah ; Broumand, Yasaman ; Fatemi, Farnaz ; Pourazizi, Mohsen</creator><contributor>Taneri, Suphi ; Suphi Taneri</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peyman, Alireza ; Irajpour, Matin ; Yazdi, Maryam ; Dehghanian, Farzaneh ; Noorshargh, Pegah ; Broumand, Yasaman ; Fatemi, Farnaz ; Pourazizi, Mohsen ; Taneri, Suphi ; Suphi Taneri</creatorcontrib><description>To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (  = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-004X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-0058</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/joph/8833830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39816207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Cornea ; Cross-sectional studies ; Eye ; Eye surgery ; Lasers ; Lasers in surgery ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Meta-analysis ; Patient satisfaction ; Quality of life ; Questionnaires ; Review ; Surgery ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of ophthalmology, 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1), p.8833830</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2025 Alireza Peyman et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2025 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2025 Alireza Peyman et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2025 Alireza Peyman et al. Journal of Ophthalmology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd. 2025</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7687-8811 ; 0000-0001-8504-9652 ; 0000-0002-9714-8209 ; 0000-0003-3961-6702</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3157032800/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3157032800?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,74869</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39816207$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Taneri, Suphi</contributor><contributor>Suphi Taneri</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peyman, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irajpour, Matin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorshargh, Pegah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broumand, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemi, Farnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourazizi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><title>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>Journal of ophthalmology</title><addtitle>J Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (  = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</description><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Lasers in surgery</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>2090-004X</issn><issn>2090-0058</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9rFDEQxxdRbKl981kWBPHBa_Njk018KcthtXAiahXfQjaZ3OXY25zJbsv99-Z659ETE0iGyWe-SWamKF5idIExY5fLsF5cCkGpoOhJcUqQRBOEmHh6sKtfJ8V5SkuUB8UVY-h5cUKlwJyg-rS4_Trqzg-bMrhy5h2UjRsgljOd8vrTJx_6chpiBDNk833ZlN83aYCVHrwpv8Gdh_tS97b8DIOeNL3uNsmnF8Uzp7sE5_v9rPhx_eF2-mky-_LxZtrMJqbi1TCR1jFOGbfMSgeiBWkRYYbXiDiNWs2JoTVvsdGICGfaWgpZt6bF2DLKtKBnxc1O1wa9VOvoVzpuVNBePThCnCsd80M7UKZiyFlmJOFtJUBKboklDiRDLdaEZK2rndZ6bFdgDfRD1N2R6PFJ7xdqHu4UxjVFCPOs8HavEMPvEdKgVj4Z6DrdQxiTophxRupaVhl9_Q-6DGPM2XugakSJyNU6UHOdf-B7F_LFZiuqGkEqzKgk2yRc_IfK08LKm9CD89l_FPDmUcACdDcsUujGbYHTMfhuB5oYUorgDtnASG3bT23bT-3bL-OvHmfwAP9tNvoHs27Spw</recordid><startdate>20250101</startdate><enddate>20250101</enddate><creator>Peyman, Alireza</creator><creator>Irajpour, Matin</creator><creator>Yazdi, Maryam</creator><creator>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</creator><creator>Noorshargh, Pegah</creator><creator>Broumand, Yasaman</creator><creator>Fatemi, Farnaz</creator><creator>Pourazizi, Mohsen</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-9652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-8209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-6702</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250101</creationdate><title>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Peyman, Alireza ; Irajpour, Matin ; Yazdi, Maryam ; Dehghanian, Farzaneh ; Noorshargh, Pegah ; Broumand, Yasaman ; Fatemi, Farnaz ; Pourazizi, Mohsen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Lasers in surgery</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peyman, Alireza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irajpour, Matin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazdi, Maryam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noorshargh, Pegah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broumand, Yasaman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatemi, Farnaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourazizi, Mohsen</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peyman, Alireza</au><au>Irajpour, Matin</au><au>Yazdi, Maryam</au><au>Dehghanian, Farzaneh</au><au>Noorshargh, Pegah</au><au>Broumand, Yasaman</au><au>Fatemi, Farnaz</au><au>Pourazizi, Mohsen</au><au>Taneri, Suphi</au><au>Suphi Taneri</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>J Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2025-01-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>2025</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8833830</spage><pages>8833830-</pages><issn>2090-004X</issn><eissn>2090-0058</eissn><abstract>To analyze patients' quality of life (QOL) after laser vision correction (LVC) from a worldwide literature review. Studies of prospective or cross-sectional design which evaluated QOL in patients after LVC and compared that to preoperative values or a matched group of emmetropes were included. The Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were searched for relevant articles published until February 2024. The fixed- or random-effects models were used to estimate the weighted mean difference (WMD) for postoperative QOL changes. Meta-regression was conducted for adjusting the effects of potential confounders. A total of 11 peer-reviewed articles (1753 patients) were included in the study. LVC improved QOL of patients at one (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.60), three (SMD = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.55, 1.50), and six months after surgery (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.30, 1.11). In meta-regression analysis, QOL improvement was lower in older patients compared to younger ones (  = -0.06, 95% CI: -0.11, -0.01). Also, no statistically significant difference was noted while comparing QOL in post-laser refractive surgery patients and emmetropes (SMD = -0.44, 95% CI: -0.95, 0.07). Patients undergoing LVC experience significant improvements in QOL, particularly in younger subjects, and achieve comparable QOL to individuals with emmetropia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39816207</pmid><doi>10.1155/joph/8833830</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7687-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-9652</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9714-8209</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3961-6702</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2090-004X
ispartof Journal of ophthalmology, 2025-01, Vol.2025 (1), p.8833830
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c450fd5c926b48e996d2d2fe950b1a22
source Wiley Online Library Open Access Titles; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central
subjects Cornea
Cross-sectional studies
Eye
Eye surgery
Lasers
Lasers in surgery
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Meta-analysis
Patient satisfaction
Quality of life
Questionnaires
Review
Surgery
Systematic review
title Quality of Life After Laser Vision Correction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T16%3A36%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20of%20Life%20After%20Laser%20Vision%20Correction:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Peyman,%20Alireza&rft.date=2025-01-01&rft.volume=2025&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8833830&rft.pages=8833830-&rft.issn=2090-004X&rft.eissn=2090-0058&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/joph/8833830&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA824153928%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c464t-9df56356d5d9fe8be9d025c6702fa0ba62c376b1ca028fcb79897bcb11d535a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3157032800&rft_id=info:pmid/39816207&rft_galeid=A824153928&rfr_iscdi=true