Loading…
Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer
Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cun...
Saved in:
Published in: | Diagnostics (Basel) 2023-08, Vol.13 (16), p.2649 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 2649 |
container_title | Diagnostics (Basel) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Lee, Inki Kim, Min Hwan Lee, Kyongkyu Oh, Keumrok Lim, Hyunwoo Ahn, Jae Hun Lee, Yong Jin Cheon, Gi Jeong Chi, Dae Yoon Lim, Sang Moo |
description | Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was >97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/diagnostics13162649 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c46cb0343b1c4aeeb1700b2fb47527cd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c46cb0343b1c4aeeb1700b2fb47527cd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2857852502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9r3DAQxU1paUKaT9CLoZde3OqfLflUgpu0gdDkkJyFPBrtevFKjmQX-u0jZ5fQlOqi0bwfj9FjiuIjJV84b8lXO5iND2keIFFOG9aI9k1xyoisKyGoevtXfVKcp7Qj-bSUK1a_L064bJhsiTotHruwn0wcUvBlcOW8xfLSOYQ5rc_vt_cXpfG2_LUW3RZHM4eYJV82oluqbrFhNnaYcHrGjk3_0nQhlncxz2lmLDvjAeOH4p0zY8Lz431WPFxd3nc_q5vbH9fdxU0FvJZzJV3fOFTAoWcoHGmJU2AdGuU4YxagRZMFKSVvlTUgWpqljEPjQKDlZ8X1wdcGs9NTHPYm_tHBDPq5EeJGm5jzG1GDaKAnXPCegjCIPZWE9Mz1QtZMwur17eA1Lf0eLaCfoxlfmb5W_LDVm_BbUyLqHHaTHT4fHWJ4XDDNej8kwHE0HsOSNFO1VDWrCcvop3_QXViiz1mtVNOq_H-RKX6gIMebIrqXaSjR64ro_6wIfwK2w7F8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2856983224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Min Hwan ; Lee, Kyongkyu ; Oh, Keumrok ; Lim, Hyunwoo ; Ahn, Jae Hun ; Lee, Yong Jin ; Cheon, Gi Jeong ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Lim, Sang Moo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Min Hwan ; Lee, Kyongkyu ; Oh, Keumrok ; Lim, Hyunwoo ; Ahn, Jae Hun ; Lee, Yong Jin ; Cheon, Gi Jeong ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><description>Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was >97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37627908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Androgens ; Antibiotics ; Antigens ; Biodistribution ; Cancer therapies ; copper-64 ; DOTA ; Gas flow ; Ligands ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Membrane filters ; Metastasis ; positron emission tomography ; Prostate cancer ; prostate-specific membrane antigen ; Radioactivity ; Radioisotopes ; Scintigraphy ; theranostics ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Diagnostics (Basel), 2023-08, Vol.13 (16), p.2649</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2856983224/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2856983224?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyongkyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Keumrok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jae Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Gi Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Dae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</title><title>Diagnostics (Basel)</title><description>Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was >97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biodistribution</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>copper-64</subject><subject>DOTA</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Membrane filters</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate-specific membrane antigen</subject><subject>Radioactivity</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>theranostics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2075-4418</issn><issn>2075-4418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9r3DAQxU1paUKaT9CLoZde3OqfLflUgpu0gdDkkJyFPBrtevFKjmQX-u0jZ5fQlOqi0bwfj9FjiuIjJV84b8lXO5iND2keIFFOG9aI9k1xyoisKyGoevtXfVKcp7Qj-bSUK1a_L064bJhsiTotHruwn0wcUvBlcOW8xfLSOYQ5rc_vt_cXpfG2_LUW3RZHM4eYJV82oluqbrFhNnaYcHrGjk3_0nQhlncxz2lmLDvjAeOH4p0zY8Lz431WPFxd3nc_q5vbH9fdxU0FvJZzJV3fOFTAoWcoHGmJU2AdGuU4YxagRZMFKSVvlTUgWpqljEPjQKDlZ8X1wdcGs9NTHPYm_tHBDPq5EeJGm5jzG1GDaKAnXPCegjCIPZWE9Mz1QtZMwur17eA1Lf0eLaCfoxlfmb5W_LDVm_BbUyLqHHaTHT4fHWJ4XDDNej8kwHE0HsOSNFO1VDWrCcvop3_QXViiz1mtVNOq_H-RKX6gIMebIrqXaSjR64ro_6wIfwK2w7F8</recordid><startdate>20230811</startdate><enddate>20230811</enddate><creator>Lee, Inki</creator><creator>Kim, Min Hwan</creator><creator>Lee, Kyongkyu</creator><creator>Oh, Keumrok</creator><creator>Lim, Hyunwoo</creator><creator>Ahn, Jae Hun</creator><creator>Lee, Yong Jin</creator><creator>Cheon, Gi Jeong</creator><creator>Chi, Dae Yoon</creator><creator>Lim, Sang Moo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230811</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</title><author>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Min Hwan ; Lee, Kyongkyu ; Oh, Keumrok ; Lim, Hyunwoo ; Ahn, Jae Hun ; Lee, Yong Jin ; Cheon, Gi Jeong ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Lim, Sang Moo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biodistribution</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>copper-64</topic><topic>DOTA</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Membrane filters</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate-specific membrane antigen</topic><topic>Radioactivity</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>theranostics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyongkyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Keumrok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jae Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Gi Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Dae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Inki</au><au>Kim, Min Hwan</au><au>Lee, Kyongkyu</au><au>Oh, Keumrok</au><au>Lim, Hyunwoo</au><au>Ahn, Jae Hun</au><au>Lee, Yong Jin</au><au>Cheon, Gi Jeong</au><au>Chi, Dae Yoon</au><au>Lim, Sang Moo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-08-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2649</spage><pages>2649-</pages><issn>2075-4418</issn><eissn>2075-4418</eissn><abstract>Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was >97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37627908</pmid><doi>10.3390/diagnostics13162649</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-4418 |
ispartof | Diagnostics (Basel), 2023-08, Vol.13 (16), p.2649 |
issn | 2075-4418 2075-4418 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c46cb0343b1c4aeeb1700b2fb47527cd |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central |
subjects | Acids Androgens Antibiotics Antigens Biodistribution Cancer therapies copper-64 DOTA Gas flow Ligands Magnetic resonance imaging Membrane filters Metastasis positron emission tomography Prostate cancer prostate-specific membrane antigen Radioactivity Radioisotopes Scintigraphy theranostics Tomography |
title | Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T18%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Effects%20of%20DOTA%20and%20NOTA%20Chelators%20on%2064Cu-Cudotadipep%20and%2064Cu-Cunotadipep%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Diagnostics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Lee,%20Inki&rft.date=2023-08-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2649&rft.pages=2649-&rft.issn=2075-4418&rft.eissn=2075-4418&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/diagnostics13162649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2857852502%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2856983224&rft_id=info:pmid/37627908&rfr_iscdi=true |