Loading…

Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer

Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diagnostics (Basel) 2023-08, Vol.13 (16), p.2649
Main Authors: Lee, Inki, Kim, Min Hwan, Lee, Kyongkyu, Oh, Keumrok, Lim, Hyunwoo, Ahn, Jae Hun, Lee, Yong Jin, Cheon, Gi Jeong, Chi, Dae Yoon, Lim, Sang Moo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3
container_end_page
container_issue 16
container_start_page 2649
container_title Diagnostics (Basel)
container_volume 13
creator Lee, Inki
Kim, Min Hwan
Lee, Kyongkyu
Oh, Keumrok
Lim, Hyunwoo
Ahn, Jae Hun
Lee, Yong Jin
Cheon, Gi Jeong
Chi, Dae Yoon
Lim, Sang Moo
description Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was >97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/diagnostics13162649
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c46cb0343b1c4aeeb1700b2fb47527cd</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c46cb0343b1c4aeeb1700b2fb47527cd</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2857852502</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9r3DAQxU1paUKaT9CLoZde3OqfLflUgpu0gdDkkJyFPBrtevFKjmQX-u0jZ5fQlOqi0bwfj9FjiuIjJV84b8lXO5iND2keIFFOG9aI9k1xyoisKyGoevtXfVKcp7Qj-bSUK1a_L064bJhsiTotHruwn0wcUvBlcOW8xfLSOYQ5rc_vt_cXpfG2_LUW3RZHM4eYJV82oluqbrFhNnaYcHrGjk3_0nQhlncxz2lmLDvjAeOH4p0zY8Lz431WPFxd3nc_q5vbH9fdxU0FvJZzJV3fOFTAoWcoHGmJU2AdGuU4YxagRZMFKSVvlTUgWpqljEPjQKDlZ8X1wdcGs9NTHPYm_tHBDPq5EeJGm5jzG1GDaKAnXPCegjCIPZWE9Mz1QtZMwur17eA1Lf0eLaCfoxlfmb5W_LDVm_BbUyLqHHaTHT4fHWJ4XDDNej8kwHE0HsOSNFO1VDWrCcvop3_QXViiz1mtVNOq_H-RKX6gIMebIrqXaSjR64ro_6wIfwK2w7F8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2856983224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Min Hwan ; Lee, Kyongkyu ; Oh, Keumrok ; Lim, Hyunwoo ; Ahn, Jae Hun ; Lee, Yong Jin ; Cheon, Gi Jeong ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Lim, Sang Moo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Min Hwan ; Lee, Kyongkyu ; Oh, Keumrok ; Lim, Hyunwoo ; Ahn, Jae Hun ; Lee, Yong Jin ; Cheon, Gi Jeong ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><description>Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was &gt;97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-4418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13162649</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37627908</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acids ; Androgens ; Antibiotics ; Antigens ; Biodistribution ; Cancer therapies ; copper-64 ; DOTA ; Gas flow ; Ligands ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Membrane filters ; Metastasis ; positron emission tomography ; Prostate cancer ; prostate-specific membrane antigen ; Radioactivity ; Radioisotopes ; Scintigraphy ; theranostics ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Diagnostics (Basel), 2023-08, Vol.13 (16), p.2649</ispartof><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2856983224/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2856983224?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,25731,27901,27902,36989,36990,44566,53766,53768,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyongkyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Keumrok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jae Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Gi Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Dae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</title><title>Diagnostics (Basel)</title><description>Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was &gt;97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Androgens</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Biodistribution</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>copper-64</subject><subject>DOTA</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Membrane filters</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>prostate-specific membrane antigen</subject><subject>Radioactivity</subject><subject>Radioisotopes</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>theranostics</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2075-4418</issn><issn>2075-4418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9r3DAQxU1paUKaT9CLoZde3OqfLflUgpu0gdDkkJyFPBrtevFKjmQX-u0jZ5fQlOqi0bwfj9FjiuIjJV84b8lXO5iND2keIFFOG9aI9k1xyoisKyGoevtXfVKcp7Qj-bSUK1a_L064bJhsiTotHruwn0wcUvBlcOW8xfLSOYQ5rc_vt_cXpfG2_LUW3RZHM4eYJV82oluqbrFhNnaYcHrGjk3_0nQhlncxz2lmLDvjAeOH4p0zY8Lz431WPFxd3nc_q5vbH9fdxU0FvJZzJV3fOFTAoWcoHGmJU2AdGuU4YxagRZMFKSVvlTUgWpqljEPjQKDlZ8X1wdcGs9NTHPYm_tHBDPq5EeJGm5jzG1GDaKAnXPCegjCIPZWE9Mz1QtZMwur17eA1Lf0eLaCfoxlfmb5W_LDVm_BbUyLqHHaTHT4fHWJ4XDDNej8kwHE0HsOSNFO1VDWrCcvop3_QXViiz1mtVNOq_H-RKX6gIMebIrqXaSjR64ro_6wIfwK2w7F8</recordid><startdate>20230811</startdate><enddate>20230811</enddate><creator>Lee, Inki</creator><creator>Kim, Min Hwan</creator><creator>Lee, Kyongkyu</creator><creator>Oh, Keumrok</creator><creator>Lim, Hyunwoo</creator><creator>Ahn, Jae Hun</creator><creator>Lee, Yong Jin</creator><creator>Cheon, Gi Jeong</creator><creator>Chi, Dae Yoon</creator><creator>Lim, Sang Moo</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230811</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</title><author>Lee, Inki ; Kim, Min Hwan ; Lee, Kyongkyu ; Oh, Keumrok ; Lim, Hyunwoo ; Ahn, Jae Hun ; Lee, Yong Jin ; Cheon, Gi Jeong ; Chi, Dae Yoon ; Lim, Sang Moo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Androgens</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Biodistribution</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>copper-64</topic><topic>DOTA</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Membrane filters</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>prostate-specific membrane antigen</topic><topic>Radioactivity</topic><topic>Radioisotopes</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>theranostics</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Inki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Min Hwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kyongkyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Keumrok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Hyunwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahn, Jae Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Yong Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheon, Gi Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chi, Dae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Sang Moo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Inki</au><au>Kim, Min Hwan</au><au>Lee, Kyongkyu</au><au>Oh, Keumrok</au><au>Lim, Hyunwoo</au><au>Ahn, Jae Hun</au><au>Lee, Yong Jin</au><au>Cheon, Gi Jeong</au><au>Chi, Dae Yoon</au><au>Lim, Sang Moo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Diagnostics (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-08-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>2649</spage><pages>2649-</pages><issn>2075-4418</issn><eissn>2075-4418</eissn><abstract>Background: This study compared the effects of 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) and 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triacetic acid (NOTA) as 64Cu-chelating agents in newly developed prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) target compounds, 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep, on pharmacokinetics. Methods: The in vitro stability of the chelators was evaluated using human and mouse serum. In vitro PSMA-binding affinity and cell uptake were compared using human 22Rv1 cells. To evaluate specific PSMA-expressing tumor-targeting efficiency, micro-positron emission tomography (mcroPET)/computed tomography (CT) and biodistribution analysis were performed using PSMA+ PC3-PIP and PSMA− PC3-flu tumor xenografts. Results: The serum stability of DOTA- or NOTA-conjugated 64Cu-cudotadipep and 64Cu-cunotadipep was &gt;97%. The Ki value of the NOTA derivative, cunotadipep, in the in vitro affinity binding analysis was higher (2.17 ± 0.25 nM) than that of the DOTA derivative, cudotadipep (6.75 ± 0.42 nM). The cunotadipep exhibited a higher cellular uptake (6.02 ± 0.05%/1 × 106 cells) compared with the cudotadipep (2.93 ± 0.06%/1 × 106 cells). In the biodistribution analysis and microPET/CT imaging, the 64Cu-labeled NOTA derivative, 64Cu-cunotadipep, demonstrated a greater tumor uptake and lower liver uptake than the DOTA derivative. Conclusions: This study indicates that the PSMA-targeted 64Cu-cunotadipep can be applied in clinical practice owing to its high diagnostic power for prostate cancer.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37627908</pmid><doi>10.3390/diagnostics13162649</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2075-4418
ispartof Diagnostics (Basel), 2023-08, Vol.13 (16), p.2649
issn 2075-4418
2075-4418
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c46cb0343b1c4aeeb1700b2fb47527cd
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
subjects Acids
Androgens
Antibiotics
Antigens
Biodistribution
Cancer therapies
copper-64
DOTA
Gas flow
Ligands
Magnetic resonance imaging
Membrane filters
Metastasis
positron emission tomography
Prostate cancer
prostate-specific membrane antigen
Radioactivity
Radioisotopes
Scintigraphy
theranostics
Tomography
title Comparison of the Effects of DOTA and NOTA Chelators on 64Cu-Cudotadipep and 64Cu-Cunotadipep for Prostate Cancer
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T18%3A12%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Effects%20of%20DOTA%20and%20NOTA%20Chelators%20on%2064Cu-Cudotadipep%20and%2064Cu-Cunotadipep%20for%20Prostate%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Diagnostics%20(Basel)&rft.au=Lee,%20Inki&rft.date=2023-08-11&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=2649&rft.pages=2649-&rft.issn=2075-4418&rft.eissn=2075-4418&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/diagnostics13162649&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2857852502%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-7fb6fe8c3cb2e4f090f8cdfea8f322dcc9ea2e4777398dac491a8fc3cc6fc4ed3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2856983224&rft_id=info:pmid/37627908&rfr_iscdi=true