Loading…
In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha
Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Indian journal of dental research 2020-01, Vol.31 (1), p.37-41 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 41 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Indian journal of dental research |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Prithviraj, K Manjunatha, R Horatti, Priya Rao, Nageshwar Gokul, S |
description | Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c4e72436111845919059f58edc2fd0b7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A619449079</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c4e72436111845919059f58edc2fd0b7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A619449079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk2P0zAUjBBIlMKZqyWu264dO4nNbbXsQtBKSAi4Wi-O3bhN4mA7qnrmj-O2sBXSIh8szZsZvY_JsrcErxnB9NpuW7-uP3_4KgWXhD_LFkQIvqIlps-zBRYVXolc4JfZqxC2GBeUl9Ui-1WP6IeN3iHlhgm8DW5EzqDYaTRY5V1joUe9hh1s9LHgmjh7iDbRwiFEPYT36G6yUwfjAe1t7JDXwfZuvEKbOUYwvdtfIRhbBB2a-jmcSacamrRXHbzOXhjog37z519m3-_vvt1-Wj18-Vjf3jysFOM4pO4LbFTRNCUUxhTQsKriQAUQyriiNKEiZ6RpGiV4UTVlq5lmTUVzrgwlOV1m9dm3dbCVk7cD-IN0YOUJcH4jwUerei0V01XOaEkI4awQROBCmILrVuWmxclzmb07e03e_Zx1iHLrZj-m9mWeNotzWhbswtpAMrWjcdGDGmxQ8qYkgjGBK5FY6ydY6bU6ncCN2tiE_yO4PgvSfULw2jwOQ7A8hkEewyAvYbiMvnd91D7s-nmvvRx0uxvd_n8ySStZj_KUD_k3H_Q3DdPDIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386023654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Prithviraj, K ; Manjunatha, R ; Horatti, Priya ; Rao, Nageshwar ; Gokul, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Prithviraj, K ; Manjunatha, R ; Horatti, Priya ; Rao, Nageshwar ; Gokul, S</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3603</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mangalore: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Comparative analysis ; Composite materials ; Dental caries ; Dental enamel ; Dental roots ; dual-chamber microbial leakage model ; EDTA ; Endodontics ; guttaflow ; Incisors ; Leakage ; microbial leakage ; Microorganisms ; resilon/epiphany ; Root canal therapy ; Root canals ; Sealing compounds ; Statistical analysis ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dental research, 2020-01, Vol.31 (1), p.37-41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2386023654?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,25731,27900,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prithviraj, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjunatha, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horatti, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokul, S</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</title><title>Indian journal of dental research</title><description>Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>dual-chamber microbial leakage model</subject><subject>EDTA</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>guttaflow</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>microbial leakage</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>resilon/epiphany</subject><subject>Root canal therapy</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Sealing compounds</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0970-9290</issn><issn>1998-3603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk2P0zAUjBBIlMKZqyWu264dO4nNbbXsQtBKSAi4Wi-O3bhN4mA7qnrmj-O2sBXSIh8szZsZvY_JsrcErxnB9NpuW7-uP3_4KgWXhD_LFkQIvqIlps-zBRYVXolc4JfZqxC2GBeUl9Ui-1WP6IeN3iHlhgm8DW5EzqDYaTRY5V1joUe9hh1s9LHgmjh7iDbRwiFEPYT36G6yUwfjAe1t7JDXwfZuvEKbOUYwvdtfIRhbBB2a-jmcSacamrRXHbzOXhjog37z519m3-_vvt1-Wj18-Vjf3jysFOM4pO4LbFTRNCUUxhTQsKriQAUQyriiNKEiZ6RpGiV4UTVlq5lmTUVzrgwlOV1m9dm3dbCVk7cD-IN0YOUJcH4jwUerei0V01XOaEkI4awQROBCmILrVuWmxclzmb07e03e_Zx1iHLrZj-m9mWeNotzWhbswtpAMrWjcdGDGmxQ8qYkgjGBK5FY6ydY6bU6ncCN2tiE_yO4PgvSfULw2jwOQ7A8hkEewyAvYbiMvnd91D7s-nmvvRx0uxvd_n8ySStZj_KUD_k3H_Q3DdPDIA</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Prithviraj, K</creator><creator>Manjunatha, R</creator><creator>Horatti, Priya</creator><creator>Rao, Nageshwar</creator><creator>Gokul, S</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</title><author>Prithviraj, K ; Manjunatha, R ; Horatti, Priya ; Rao, Nageshwar ; Gokul, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>dual-chamber microbial leakage model</topic><topic>EDTA</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>guttaflow</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>microbial leakage</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>resilon/epiphany</topic><topic>Root canal therapy</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Sealing compounds</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prithviraj, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjunatha, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horatti, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokul, S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prithviraj, K</au><au>Manjunatha, R</au><au>Horatti, Priya</au><au>Rao, Nageshwar</au><au>Gokul, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dental research</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>37-41</pages><issn>0970-9290</issn><eissn>1998-3603</eissn><abstract>Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.</abstract><cop>Mangalore</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0970-9290 |
ispartof | Indian journal of dental research, 2020-01, Vol.31 (1), p.37-41 |
issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c4e72436111845919059f58edc2fd0b7 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Bacteria Comparative analysis Composite materials Dental caries Dental enamel Dental roots dual-chamber microbial leakage model EDTA Endodontics guttaflow Incisors Leakage microbial leakage Microorganisms resilon/epiphany Root canal therapy Root canals Sealing compounds Statistical analysis Teeth |
title | In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T09%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20comparison%20of%20the%20microbial%20leakage%20of%20obturation%20systems:%20Epiphany%20with%20resilon,%20guttaflow,%20and%20ah%20plus%20with%20gutta%20percha&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Prithviraj,%20K&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=37-41&rft.issn=0970-9290&rft.eissn=1998-3603&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA619449079%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386023654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A619449079&rfr_iscdi=true |