Loading…

In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha

Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Indian journal of dental research 2020-01, Vol.31 (1), p.37-41
Main Authors: Prithviraj, K, Manjunatha, R, Horatti, Priya, Rao, Nageshwar, Gokul, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123
cites
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Indian journal of dental research
container_volume 31
creator Prithviraj, K
Manjunatha, R
Horatti, Priya
Rao, Nageshwar
Gokul, S
description Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c4e72436111845919059f58edc2fd0b7</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A619449079</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c4e72436111845919059f58edc2fd0b7</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A619449079</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uk2P0zAUjBBIlMKZqyWu264dO4nNbbXsQtBKSAi4Wi-O3bhN4mA7qnrmj-O2sBXSIh8szZsZvY_JsrcErxnB9NpuW7-uP3_4KgWXhD_LFkQIvqIlps-zBRYVXolc4JfZqxC2GBeUl9Ui-1WP6IeN3iHlhgm8DW5EzqDYaTRY5V1joUe9hh1s9LHgmjh7iDbRwiFEPYT36G6yUwfjAe1t7JDXwfZuvEKbOUYwvdtfIRhbBB2a-jmcSacamrRXHbzOXhjog37z519m3-_vvt1-Wj18-Vjf3jysFOM4pO4LbFTRNCUUxhTQsKriQAUQyriiNKEiZ6RpGiV4UTVlq5lmTUVzrgwlOV1m9dm3dbCVk7cD-IN0YOUJcH4jwUerei0V01XOaEkI4awQROBCmILrVuWmxclzmb07e03e_Zx1iHLrZj-m9mWeNotzWhbswtpAMrWjcdGDGmxQ8qYkgjGBK5FY6ydY6bU6ncCN2tiE_yO4PgvSfULw2jwOQ7A8hkEewyAvYbiMvnd91D7s-nmvvRx0uxvd_n8ySStZj_KUD_k3H_Q3DdPDIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2386023654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Prithviraj, K ; Manjunatha, R ; Horatti, Priya ; Rao, Nageshwar ; Gokul, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Prithviraj, K ; Manjunatha, R ; Horatti, Priya ; Rao, Nageshwar ; Gokul, S</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0970-9290</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3603</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Mangalore: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Comparative analysis ; Composite materials ; Dental caries ; Dental enamel ; Dental roots ; dual-chamber microbial leakage model ; EDTA ; Endodontics ; guttaflow ; Incisors ; Leakage ; microbial leakage ; Microorganisms ; resilon/epiphany ; Root canal therapy ; Root canals ; Sealing compounds ; Statistical analysis ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dental research, 2020-01, Vol.31 (1), p.37-41</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2386023654?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,25731,27900,27901,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prithviraj, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjunatha, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horatti, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokul, S</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</title><title>Indian journal of dental research</title><description>Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental enamel</subject><subject>Dental roots</subject><subject>dual-chamber microbial leakage model</subject><subject>EDTA</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>guttaflow</subject><subject>Incisors</subject><subject>Leakage</subject><subject>microbial leakage</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>resilon/epiphany</subject><subject>Root canal therapy</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Sealing compounds</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0970-9290</issn><issn>1998-3603</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uk2P0zAUjBBIlMKZqyWu264dO4nNbbXsQtBKSAi4Wi-O3bhN4mA7qnrmj-O2sBXSIh8szZsZvY_JsrcErxnB9NpuW7-uP3_4KgWXhD_LFkQIvqIlps-zBRYVXolc4JfZqxC2GBeUl9Ui-1WP6IeN3iHlhgm8DW5EzqDYaTRY5V1joUe9hh1s9LHgmjh7iDbRwiFEPYT36G6yUwfjAe1t7JDXwfZuvEKbOUYwvdtfIRhbBB2a-jmcSacamrRXHbzOXhjog37z519m3-_vvt1-Wj18-Vjf3jysFOM4pO4LbFTRNCUUxhTQsKriQAUQyriiNKEiZ6RpGiV4UTVlq5lmTUVzrgwlOV1m9dm3dbCVk7cD-IN0YOUJcH4jwUerei0V01XOaEkI4awQROBCmILrVuWmxclzmb07e03e_Zx1iHLrZj-m9mWeNotzWhbswtpAMrWjcdGDGmxQ8qYkgjGBK5FY6ydY6bU6ncCN2tiE_yO4PgvSfULw2jwOQ7A8hkEewyAvYbiMvnd91D7s-nmvvRx0uxvd_n8ySStZj_KUD_k3H_Q3DdPDIA</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Prithviraj, K</creator><creator>Manjunatha, R</creator><creator>Horatti, Priya</creator><creator>Rao, Nageshwar</creator><creator>Gokul, S</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</title><author>Prithviraj, K ; Manjunatha, R ; Horatti, Priya ; Rao, Nageshwar ; Gokul, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental enamel</topic><topic>Dental roots</topic><topic>dual-chamber microbial leakage model</topic><topic>EDTA</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>guttaflow</topic><topic>Incisors</topic><topic>Leakage</topic><topic>microbial leakage</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>resilon/epiphany</topic><topic>Root canal therapy</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Sealing compounds</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prithviraj, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manjunatha, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horatti, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Nageshwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gokul, S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prithviraj, K</au><au>Manjunatha, R</au><au>Horatti, Priya</au><au>Rao, Nageshwar</au><au>Gokul, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dental research</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>37-41</pages><issn>0970-9290</issn><eissn>1998-3603</eissn><abstract>Aim: To compare the microbial leakage of three root canal filling materials: AH Plus with Gutta-percha, Epiphany with Resilon, and Guttaflow using Enterococcus faecalis as the bacterial marker. Materials and Methods: In total, 30 caries free, human maxillary incisors with straight roots were used. The teeth were de-coronated with a diamond disc and the length was standardized for all specimens. Access opening was done through the coronal portion and the working length was determined. All the teeth were prepared to a standardized size apically and coronally. The teeth were then randomly divided into three experimental groups each. After obturation of the root canals, the outer surfaces of the teeth were coated with two layers of nail enamel except the apical 2 mm. The teeth were then subjected for bacterial leakage test using E. faecalis as a bacterial marker in dual chamber bacterial leakage model for a period of 30 days. Statistical Analysis Used: Chi-square test. Results: Results showed that Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) demonstrated less leakage and Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) showed maximum leakage with the statistically significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.05). Guttaflow (Group-3) also showed less leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus (Group-1) with the statistically significant difference between the two (P &lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between Resilon/Epiphany (Group-2) and Guttaflow (Group-3). Conclusion: Resilon/Epiphany and Guttaflow groups demonstrated less microbial leakage than Gutta-percha/AH Plus group.</abstract><cop>Mangalore</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0970-9290
ispartof Indian journal of dental research, 2020-01, Vol.31 (1), p.37-41
issn 0970-9290
1998-3603
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c4e72436111845919059f58edc2fd0b7
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Bacteria
Comparative analysis
Composite materials
Dental caries
Dental enamel
Dental roots
dual-chamber microbial leakage model
EDTA
Endodontics
guttaflow
Incisors
Leakage
microbial leakage
Microorganisms
resilon/epiphany
Root canal therapy
Root canals
Sealing compounds
Statistical analysis
Teeth
title In Vitro comparison of the microbial leakage of obturation systems: Epiphany with resilon, guttaflow, and ah plus with gutta percha
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T09%3A28%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20comparison%20of%20the%20microbial%20leakage%20of%20obturation%20systems:%20Epiphany%20with%20resilon,%20guttaflow,%20and%20ah%20plus%20with%20gutta%20percha&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dental%20research&rft.au=Prithviraj,%20K&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=37-41&rft.issn=0970-9290&rft.eissn=1998-3603&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_98_18&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA619449079%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480s-9250fc5bb6a5ff5ab4778a39a1348c33a5f9241bbbc9857b6de4e4b7328cf3123%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2386023654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A619449079&rfr_iscdi=true