Loading…
Sensitivity of Simulated Conditions to Different Parameterization Choices Over Complex Terrain in Central Chile
This study evaluates the performance of fourteen high-resolution WRF runs with different combinations of parameterizations in simulating the atmospheric conditions over the complex terrain of central Chile during austral winter and spring. We focus on the validation of results for coastal, interior...
Saved in:
Published in: | Atmosphere 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 10 |
container_title | Atmosphere |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Arévalo, Jorge Marín, Julio C. Díaz, Mailiu Raga, Graciela Pozo, Diana Córdova, Ana María Baumgardner, Darrel |
description | This study evaluates the performance of fourteen high-resolution WRF runs with different combinations of parameterizations in simulating the atmospheric conditions over the complex terrain of central Chile during austral winter and spring. We focus on the validation of results for coastal, interior valleys, and mountainous areas independently, and also present an in-depth analysis of two synoptic-scale events that occurred during the study period: a frontal system and a cut-off low. The performance of the simulations decreases from the coast to higher altitudes, even though the differences are not very clear between the coast and interior valleys for 10 m wind speeds and precipitation. The simulated vertical profiles show a warmer and drier boundary layer and a cooler and moister free atmosphere than observed. The choice of the land-surface model has the largest positive impact on near-surface variables with the five-layer thermal diffusion scheme showing the smallest errors. Precipitation is more sensitive to the choice of cumulus parameterizations, with the simplified Arakawa–Schubert scheme generally providing the best performance for absolute errors. When examining the performance of the model simulating rain/no-rain events for different thresholds, also the cumulus parameterizations better represented the false alarm ratio (FAR) and the bias score (BS). However, the Morrison microphysics scheme resulted in the best critical success index (CSI), while the probability of detection (POD) was better in the simulation without analysis nudging. Overall, these results provide guidance to other researchers and help to identify the best WRF configuration for a specific research or operational goal. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/atmos15010010 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c5a5d30716844f8ca1e520d618719035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780871451</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c5a5d30716844f8ca1e520d618719035</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A780871451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1rHTEMXEoLDUmOvRt63tSfu_YxbL8CgRSSno3WllM_dtevtl9o8uvj9JXSWgIJa2YYoa57x-iFEIZ-gLqmwhRltOWr7oTTUfRSCvH6n_5td17KjrYnjeBCnnTpFrcSa3yI9ZGkQG7jeligoidT2nwbpK2QmsjHGAJm3Cr5BhlWrJjjE7yMyfQjRYeF3Dxgbqx1v-Avcoc5Q9xIy6mxMiwNFxc8694EWAqe_6mn3ffPn-6mr_31zZer6fK6d5Ka2g9uYINAjc0paqdmDYBMzobNZvYgUShNjVccZq1nFqSjIw5oPOWezxzEaXd11PUJdnaf4wr50SaI9vdHyvcWco1uQesUKC_oyAYtZdAOGCpO_cD0yAwVqmm9P2rtc_p5wFLtLh3y1uxbbphW3EipG-riiLqHJhq3kNrWroXHNbq0YWjr28tR06YrFWuE_khwOZWSMfy1yah9uan976biGQCdlNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918529448</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitivity of Simulated Conditions to Different Parameterization Choices Over Complex Terrain in Central Chile</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Arévalo, Jorge ; Marín, Julio C. ; Díaz, Mailiu ; Raga, Graciela ; Pozo, Diana ; Córdova, Ana María ; Baumgardner, Darrel</creator><creatorcontrib>Arévalo, Jorge ; Marín, Julio C. ; Díaz, Mailiu ; Raga, Graciela ; Pozo, Diana ; Córdova, Ana María ; Baumgardner, Darrel</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluates the performance of fourteen high-resolution WRF runs with different combinations of parameterizations in simulating the atmospheric conditions over the complex terrain of central Chile during austral winter and spring. We focus on the validation of results for coastal, interior valleys, and mountainous areas independently, and also present an in-depth analysis of two synoptic-scale events that occurred during the study period: a frontal system and a cut-off low. The performance of the simulations decreases from the coast to higher altitudes, even though the differences are not very clear between the coast and interior valleys for 10 m wind speeds and precipitation. The simulated vertical profiles show a warmer and drier boundary layer and a cooler and moister free atmosphere than observed. The choice of the land-surface model has the largest positive impact on near-surface variables with the five-layer thermal diffusion scheme showing the smallest errors. Precipitation is more sensitive to the choice of cumulus parameterizations, with the simplified Arakawa–Schubert scheme generally providing the best performance for absolute errors. When examining the performance of the model simulating rain/no-rain events for different thresholds, also the cumulus parameterizations better represented the false alarm ratio (FAR) and the bias score (BS). However, the Morrison microphysics scheme resulted in the best critical success index (CSI), while the probability of detection (POD) was better in the simulation without analysis nudging. Overall, these results provide guidance to other researchers and help to identify the best WRF configuration for a specific research or operational goal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/atmos15010010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Atmospheric conditions ; Boundary conditions ; Boundary layers ; Case studies ; central Chile ; Clouds ; Cold ; complex terrain ; Diffusion layers ; Environmental aspects ; Errors ; Experiments ; False alarms ; Free atmosphere ; Microphysics ; Mountain regions ; Mountainous areas ; Numerical weather forecasting ; Parameterization ; Performance evaluation ; Precipitation ; Probability theory ; Radiation ; Rain ; Rainfall simulators ; Simulation ; Terrain ; Thermal diffusion ; Topographical drawing ; Valleys ; Vertical profiles ; Weather ; Weather forecasting ; Wind speed ; WRF sensitivity studies</subject><ispartof>Atmosphere, 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.10</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0528-0120 ; 0000-0002-6889-5395 ; 0000-0001-8112-722X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918529448/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918529448?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25731,27901,27902,36989,44566,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arévalo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marín, Julio C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Mailiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raga, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozo, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Córdova, Ana María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgardner, Darrel</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitivity of Simulated Conditions to Different Parameterization Choices Over Complex Terrain in Central Chile</title><title>Atmosphere</title><description>This study evaluates the performance of fourteen high-resolution WRF runs with different combinations of parameterizations in simulating the atmospheric conditions over the complex terrain of central Chile during austral winter and spring. We focus on the validation of results for coastal, interior valleys, and mountainous areas independently, and also present an in-depth analysis of two synoptic-scale events that occurred during the study period: a frontal system and a cut-off low. The performance of the simulations decreases from the coast to higher altitudes, even though the differences are not very clear between the coast and interior valleys for 10 m wind speeds and precipitation. The simulated vertical profiles show a warmer and drier boundary layer and a cooler and moister free atmosphere than observed. The choice of the land-surface model has the largest positive impact on near-surface variables with the five-layer thermal diffusion scheme showing the smallest errors. Precipitation is more sensitive to the choice of cumulus parameterizations, with the simplified Arakawa–Schubert scheme generally providing the best performance for absolute errors. When examining the performance of the model simulating rain/no-rain events for different thresholds, also the cumulus parameterizations better represented the false alarm ratio (FAR) and the bias score (BS). However, the Morrison microphysics scheme resulted in the best critical success index (CSI), while the probability of detection (POD) was better in the simulation without analysis nudging. Overall, these results provide guidance to other researchers and help to identify the best WRF configuration for a specific research or operational goal.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Atmospheric conditions</subject><subject>Boundary conditions</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>central Chile</subject><subject>Clouds</subject><subject>Cold</subject><subject>complex terrain</subject><subject>Diffusion layers</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>False alarms</subject><subject>Free atmosphere</subject><subject>Microphysics</subject><subject>Mountain regions</subject><subject>Mountainous areas</subject><subject>Numerical weather forecasting</subject><subject>Parameterization</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall simulators</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Terrain</subject><subject>Thermal diffusion</subject><subject>Topographical drawing</subject><subject>Valleys</subject><subject>Vertical profiles</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><subject>Wind speed</subject><subject>WRF sensitivity studies</subject><issn>2073-4433</issn><issn>2073-4433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1rHTEMXEoLDUmOvRt63tSfu_YxbL8CgRSSno3WllM_dtevtl9o8uvj9JXSWgIJa2YYoa57x-iFEIZ-gLqmwhRltOWr7oTTUfRSCvH6n_5td17KjrYnjeBCnnTpFrcSa3yI9ZGkQG7jeligoidT2nwbpK2QmsjHGAJm3Cr5BhlWrJjjE7yMyfQjRYeF3Dxgbqx1v-Avcoc5Q9xIy6mxMiwNFxc8694EWAqe_6mn3ffPn-6mr_31zZer6fK6d5Ka2g9uYINAjc0paqdmDYBMzobNZvYgUShNjVccZq1nFqSjIw5oPOWezxzEaXd11PUJdnaf4wr50SaI9vdHyvcWco1uQesUKC_oyAYtZdAOGCpO_cD0yAwVqmm9P2rtc_p5wFLtLh3y1uxbbphW3EipG-riiLqHJhq3kNrWroXHNbq0YWjr28tR06YrFWuE_khwOZWSMfy1yah9uan976biGQCdlNU</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Arévalo, Jorge</creator><creator>Marín, Julio C.</creator><creator>Díaz, Mailiu</creator><creator>Raga, Graciela</creator><creator>Pozo, Diana</creator><creator>Córdova, Ana María</creator><creator>Baumgardner, Darrel</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0528-0120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-5395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-722X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Sensitivity of Simulated Conditions to Different Parameterization Choices Over Complex Terrain in Central Chile</title><author>Arévalo, Jorge ; Marín, Julio C. ; Díaz, Mailiu ; Raga, Graciela ; Pozo, Diana ; Córdova, Ana María ; Baumgardner, Darrel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Atmospheric conditions</topic><topic>Boundary conditions</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>central Chile</topic><topic>Clouds</topic><topic>Cold</topic><topic>complex terrain</topic><topic>Diffusion layers</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>False alarms</topic><topic>Free atmosphere</topic><topic>Microphysics</topic><topic>Mountain regions</topic><topic>Mountainous areas</topic><topic>Numerical weather forecasting</topic><topic>Parameterization</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall simulators</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Terrain</topic><topic>Thermal diffusion</topic><topic>Topographical drawing</topic><topic>Valleys</topic><topic>Vertical profiles</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><topic>Wind speed</topic><topic>WRF sensitivity studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arévalo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marín, Julio C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Mailiu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raga, Graciela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozo, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Córdova, Ana María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgardner, Darrel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Atmosphere</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arévalo, Jorge</au><au>Marín, Julio C.</au><au>Díaz, Mailiu</au><au>Raga, Graciela</au><au>Pozo, Diana</au><au>Córdova, Ana María</au><au>Baumgardner, Darrel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitivity of Simulated Conditions to Different Parameterization Choices Over Complex Terrain in Central Chile</atitle><jtitle>Atmosphere</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>10</spage><pages>10-</pages><issn>2073-4433</issn><eissn>2073-4433</eissn><abstract>This study evaluates the performance of fourteen high-resolution WRF runs with different combinations of parameterizations in simulating the atmospheric conditions over the complex terrain of central Chile during austral winter and spring. We focus on the validation of results for coastal, interior valleys, and mountainous areas independently, and also present an in-depth analysis of two synoptic-scale events that occurred during the study period: a frontal system and a cut-off low. The performance of the simulations decreases from the coast to higher altitudes, even though the differences are not very clear between the coast and interior valleys for 10 m wind speeds and precipitation. The simulated vertical profiles show a warmer and drier boundary layer and a cooler and moister free atmosphere than observed. The choice of the land-surface model has the largest positive impact on near-surface variables with the five-layer thermal diffusion scheme showing the smallest errors. Precipitation is more sensitive to the choice of cumulus parameterizations, with the simplified Arakawa–Schubert scheme generally providing the best performance for absolute errors. When examining the performance of the model simulating rain/no-rain events for different thresholds, also the cumulus parameterizations better represented the false alarm ratio (FAR) and the bias score (BS). However, the Morrison microphysics scheme resulted in the best critical success index (CSI), while the probability of detection (POD) was better in the simulation without analysis nudging. Overall, these results provide guidance to other researchers and help to identify the best WRF configuration for a specific research or operational goal.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/atmos15010010</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0528-0120</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6889-5395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-722X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2073-4433 |
ispartof | Atmosphere, 2024-01, Vol.15 (1), p.10 |
issn | 2073-4433 2073-4433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c5a5d30716844f8ca1e520d618719035 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Analysis Atmospheric conditions Boundary conditions Boundary layers Case studies central Chile Clouds Cold complex terrain Diffusion layers Environmental aspects Errors Experiments False alarms Free atmosphere Microphysics Mountain regions Mountainous areas Numerical weather forecasting Parameterization Performance evaluation Precipitation Probability theory Radiation Rain Rainfall simulators Simulation Terrain Thermal diffusion Topographical drawing Valleys Vertical profiles Weather Weather forecasting Wind speed WRF sensitivity studies |
title | Sensitivity of Simulated Conditions to Different Parameterization Choices Over Complex Terrain in Central Chile |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T08%3A03%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitivity%20of%20Simulated%20Conditions%20to%20Different%20Parameterization%20Choices%20Over%20Complex%20Terrain%20in%20Central%20Chile&rft.jtitle=Atmosphere&rft.au=Ar%C3%A9valo,%20Jorge&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=10&rft.pages=10-&rft.issn=2073-4433&rft.eissn=2073-4433&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/atmos15010010&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA780871451%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-6c6163e8e004e8c5b8aae14b91b9bda4e35809d52ab88b1f4c07e6e9d02d2b2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918529448&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A780871451&rfr_iscdi=true |