A convenient approach for knee kinematics assessment using wearable inertial sensors during home-based rehabilitation: Validation with an optoelectronic system

• Published in: Scientific African 2023-07, Vol.20, p.e01676-e01676, Article e01676
• Main Authors: El Fezazi, Mohamed, Achmamad, Abdelouahad, Jbari, Atman, Jilbab, Abdelilah
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: E-health rehabilitation; Human motion estimation; Inertial sensor fusion; Telemedicine; Wearable system
• ISSN: 2468-2276; 2468-2276
• DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01676

Rehabilitation services are among the most severely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This has increased the number of people not receiving the needed rehabilitation care. Home-based rehabilitation becomes alternative support to face this greater need. However, monitoring kinematics parameters during rehabilitation exercises is critical for an effective recovery. This work proposes a detailed framework to estimate knee kinematics using a wearable Magnetic and Inertial Measurement Unit (MIMU). That allows at-home monitoring for knee rehabilitation progress. Two MIMU sensors were attached to the shank and thigh segments respectively. First, the absolute orientation of each sensor was estimated using a sensor fusion algorithm. Second, these sensor orientations were transformed to segments orientations using a functional sensor-to-segment (STS) alignment. Third, the relative orientation between segments, i.e., knee joint angle, was computed and the relevant kinematics parameters were extracted. Then, the validity of our approach was evaluated with a gold-standard optoelectronic system. Seven participants completed three to five Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) tests. The estimated knee angle was compared to the reference angle. Root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis were considered as evaluation metrics. Our results showed reasonable accuracy (RMSE < 8°), strong to very-strong correlation (correlation coefficient > 0.86), a mean difference within 1.1°, and agreement limits from -16° to 14°. In addition, no significant difference was found (p-value > 0.05) in extracted kinematics parameters between both systems. The proposed approach might represent a suitable alternative for the assessment of knee rehabilitation progress in a home context.