Loading…
The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission
Airborne infection from aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 poses an economic challenge for businesses without existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The Environmental Protection Agency notes that standalone units may be used in areas without existing HVAC systems, but the cost and e...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cost effectiveness and resource allocation 2022-05, Vol.20 (1), p.22-10, Article 22 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883 |
container_end_page | 10 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 22 |
container_title | Cost effectiveness and resource allocation |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Zafari, Zafar de Oliveira, Pedro M Gkantonas, Savvas Ezeh, Chinenye Muennig, Peter Alexander |
description | Airborne infection from aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 poses an economic challenge for businesses without existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The Environmental Protection Agency notes that standalone units may be used in areas without existing HVAC systems, but the cost and effectiveness of standalone units has not been evaluated.
Cost-effectiveness analysis with Monte Carlo simulation and aerosol transmission modeling.
We built a probabilistic decision-analytic model in a Monte Carlo simulation that examines aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in an indoor space. As a base case study, we built a model that simulated a poorly ventilated indoor 1000 square foot restaurant and the range of Covid-19 prevalence of actively infectious cases (best-case: 0.1%, base-case: 2%, and worst-case: 3%) and vaccination rates (best-case: 90%, base-case: 70%, and worst-case: 0%) in New York City. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of improving ventilation rate to 12 air changes per hour (ACH), the equivalent of hospital-grade filtration systems used in emergency departments. We also provide a customizable online tool that allows the user to change model parameters.
All 3 scenarios resulted in a net cost-savings and infections averted. For the base-case scenario, improving ventilation to 12 ACH was associated with 54 [95% Credible Interval (CrI): 29-86] aerosol infections averted over 1 year, producing an estimated cost savings of $152,701 (95% CrI: $80,663, $249,501) and 1.35 (95% CrI: 0.72, 2.24) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
It is cost-effective to improve indoor ventilation in small businesses in older buildings that lack HVAC systems during the pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12962-022-00356-1 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c5e53818661e4cb9b99c6e61d3cb32b5</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c5e53818661e4cb9b99c6e61d3cb32b5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2666685107</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkV1LHDEUhkOpqLX-gV6UQK_H5mPydVNYFlsFoVJtb0Mmc6JZZidrkhX67xt3rWgg5OOc5805eRH6RMkZpVp-LZQZyTrC2iRcyI6-Q8e0V7pTolfvX-2P0IdSVoQwzog-REdciN4oao7Rw-09YJ9K7SAE8DU-wgyl4BRwqW4e3ZRmwBfn1wsc4lSzqzHNeDvHWnBIGdeGbzI0ahdomIt5SLlBN4tfN3iZ_nQMN24u61hKy_mIDoKbCpw-ryfo9_fz2-VFd_Xzx-VycdX53sjaymZAnRCK9cERFsBoSiiVyis2wNB7LaSjfGxH7kNg0gAXLpB-hMCJ1vwEXe51x-RWdpPj2uW_Nrlodxcp31mXa_QTWC9AcN2-VFLo_WAGY7wESUfuB84G0bS-7bU222ENo2_dZje9EX0bmeO9vUuP1hAjlZBN4MuzQE4PWyjVrtI2z61_y2QbWlCiWhbbZ_mcSskQXl6gxD5ZbveW22a53VluaYM-v67tBfnvMf8HpR-oVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2666685107</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Zafari, Zafar ; de Oliveira, Pedro M ; Gkantonas, Savvas ; Ezeh, Chinenye ; Muennig, Peter Alexander</creator><creatorcontrib>Zafari, Zafar ; de Oliveira, Pedro M ; Gkantonas, Savvas ; Ezeh, Chinenye ; Muennig, Peter Alexander</creatorcontrib><description>Airborne infection from aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 poses an economic challenge for businesses without existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The Environmental Protection Agency notes that standalone units may be used in areas without existing HVAC systems, but the cost and effectiveness of standalone units has not been evaluated.
Cost-effectiveness analysis with Monte Carlo simulation and aerosol transmission modeling.
We built a probabilistic decision-analytic model in a Monte Carlo simulation that examines aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in an indoor space. As a base case study, we built a model that simulated a poorly ventilated indoor 1000 square foot restaurant and the range of Covid-19 prevalence of actively infectious cases (best-case: 0.1%, base-case: 2%, and worst-case: 3%) and vaccination rates (best-case: 90%, base-case: 70%, and worst-case: 0%) in New York City. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of improving ventilation rate to 12 air changes per hour (ACH), the equivalent of hospital-grade filtration systems used in emergency departments. We also provide a customizable online tool that allows the user to change model parameters.
All 3 scenarios resulted in a net cost-savings and infections averted. For the base-case scenario, improving ventilation to 12 ACH was associated with 54 [95% Credible Interval (CrI): 29-86] aerosol infections averted over 1 year, producing an estimated cost savings of $152,701 (95% CrI: $80,663, $249,501) and 1.35 (95% CrI: 0.72, 2.24) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
It is cost-effective to improve indoor ventilation in small businesses in older buildings that lack HVAC systems during the pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-7547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-7547</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12962-022-00356-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35549719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Commercial spaces ; Coronaviruses ; Cost analysis ; COVID-19 ; Customer services ; Disease transmission ; Economic evaluation ; HVAC ; Improving ventilation ; Infections ; Restaurants ; Restaurants and bars ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation, 2022-05, Vol.20 (1), p.22-10, Article 22</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2507-4949</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9096756/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2666685107?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11688,25753,27924,27925,36060,37012,38516,43895,44363,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35549719$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zafari, Zafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Pedro M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gkantonas, Savvas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezeh, Chinenye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muennig, Peter Alexander</creatorcontrib><title>The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission</title><title>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation</title><addtitle>Cost Eff Resour Alloc</addtitle><description>Airborne infection from aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 poses an economic challenge for businesses without existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The Environmental Protection Agency notes that standalone units may be used in areas without existing HVAC systems, but the cost and effectiveness of standalone units has not been evaluated.
Cost-effectiveness analysis with Monte Carlo simulation and aerosol transmission modeling.
We built a probabilistic decision-analytic model in a Monte Carlo simulation that examines aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in an indoor space. As a base case study, we built a model that simulated a poorly ventilated indoor 1000 square foot restaurant and the range of Covid-19 prevalence of actively infectious cases (best-case: 0.1%, base-case: 2%, and worst-case: 3%) and vaccination rates (best-case: 90%, base-case: 70%, and worst-case: 0%) in New York City. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of improving ventilation rate to 12 air changes per hour (ACH), the equivalent of hospital-grade filtration systems used in emergency departments. We also provide a customizable online tool that allows the user to change model parameters.
All 3 scenarios resulted in a net cost-savings and infections averted. For the base-case scenario, improving ventilation to 12 ACH was associated with 54 [95% Credible Interval (CrI): 29-86] aerosol infections averted over 1 year, producing an estimated cost savings of $152,701 (95% CrI: $80,663, $249,501) and 1.35 (95% CrI: 0.72, 2.24) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
It is cost-effective to improve indoor ventilation in small businesses in older buildings that lack HVAC systems during the pandemic.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Commercial spaces</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Customer services</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Economic evaluation</subject><subject>HVAC</subject><subject>Improving ventilation</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Restaurants</subject><subject>Restaurants and bars</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>1478-7547</issn><issn>1478-7547</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkV1LHDEUhkOpqLX-gV6UQK_H5mPydVNYFlsFoVJtb0Mmc6JZZidrkhX67xt3rWgg5OOc5805eRH6RMkZpVp-LZQZyTrC2iRcyI6-Q8e0V7pTolfvX-2P0IdSVoQwzog-REdciN4oao7Rw-09YJ9K7SAE8DU-wgyl4BRwqW4e3ZRmwBfn1wsc4lSzqzHNeDvHWnBIGdeGbzI0ahdomIt5SLlBN4tfN3iZ_nQMN24u61hKy_mIDoKbCpw-ryfo9_fz2-VFd_Xzx-VycdX53sjaymZAnRCK9cERFsBoSiiVyis2wNB7LaSjfGxH7kNg0gAXLpB-hMCJ1vwEXe51x-RWdpPj2uW_Nrlodxcp31mXa_QTWC9AcN2-VFLo_WAGY7wESUfuB84G0bS-7bU222ENo2_dZje9EX0bmeO9vUuP1hAjlZBN4MuzQE4PWyjVrtI2z61_y2QbWlCiWhbbZ_mcSskQXl6gxD5ZbveW22a53VluaYM-v67tBfnvMf8HpR-oVg</recordid><startdate>20220512</startdate><enddate>20220512</enddate><creator>Zafari, Zafar</creator><creator>de Oliveira, Pedro M</creator><creator>Gkantonas, Savvas</creator><creator>Ezeh, Chinenye</creator><creator>Muennig, Peter Alexander</creator><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2507-4949</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220512</creationdate><title>The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission</title><author>Zafari, Zafar ; de Oliveira, Pedro M ; Gkantonas, Savvas ; Ezeh, Chinenye ; Muennig, Peter Alexander</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Commercial spaces</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Customer services</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Economic evaluation</topic><topic>HVAC</topic><topic>Improving ventilation</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Restaurants</topic><topic>Restaurants and bars</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zafari, Zafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Oliveira, Pedro M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gkantonas, Savvas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezeh, Chinenye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muennig, Peter Alexander</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zafari, Zafar</au><au>de Oliveira, Pedro M</au><au>Gkantonas, Savvas</au><au>Ezeh, Chinenye</au><au>Muennig, Peter Alexander</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission</atitle><jtitle>Cost effectiveness and resource allocation</jtitle><addtitle>Cost Eff Resour Alloc</addtitle><date>2022-05-12</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>22</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>22-10</pages><artnum>22</artnum><issn>1478-7547</issn><eissn>1478-7547</eissn><abstract>Airborne infection from aerosolized SARS-CoV-2 poses an economic challenge for businesses without existing heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. The Environmental Protection Agency notes that standalone units may be used in areas without existing HVAC systems, but the cost and effectiveness of standalone units has not been evaluated.
Cost-effectiveness analysis with Monte Carlo simulation and aerosol transmission modeling.
We built a probabilistic decision-analytic model in a Monte Carlo simulation that examines aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in an indoor space. As a base case study, we built a model that simulated a poorly ventilated indoor 1000 square foot restaurant and the range of Covid-19 prevalence of actively infectious cases (best-case: 0.1%, base-case: 2%, and worst-case: 3%) and vaccination rates (best-case: 90%, base-case: 70%, and worst-case: 0%) in New York City. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of improving ventilation rate to 12 air changes per hour (ACH), the equivalent of hospital-grade filtration systems used in emergency departments. We also provide a customizable online tool that allows the user to change model parameters.
All 3 scenarios resulted in a net cost-savings and infections averted. For the base-case scenario, improving ventilation to 12 ACH was associated with 54 [95% Credible Interval (CrI): 29-86] aerosol infections averted over 1 year, producing an estimated cost savings of $152,701 (95% CrI: $80,663, $249,501) and 1.35 (95% CrI: 0.72, 2.24) quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.
It is cost-effective to improve indoor ventilation in small businesses in older buildings that lack HVAC systems during the pandemic.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central</pub><pmid>35549719</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12962-022-00356-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2507-4949</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1478-7547 |
ispartof | Cost effectiveness and resource allocation, 2022-05, Vol.20 (1), p.22-10, Article 22 |
issn | 1478-7547 1478-7547 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c5e53818661e4cb9b99c6e61d3cb32b5 |
source | ABI/INFORM global; PubMed Central Free; Publicly Available Content Database; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Aerosols Commercial spaces Coronaviruses Cost analysis COVID-19 Customer services Disease transmission Economic evaluation HVAC Improving ventilation Infections Restaurants Restaurants and bars SARS-CoV-2 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Ventilation |
title | The cost-effectiveness of standalone HEPA filtration units for the prevention of airborne SARS CoV-2 transmission |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T23%3A12%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20standalone%20HEPA%20filtration%20units%20for%20the%20prevention%20of%20airborne%20SARS%20CoV-2%20transmission&rft.jtitle=Cost%20effectiveness%20and%20resource%20allocation&rft.au=Zafari,%20Zafar&rft.date=2022-05-12&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=22&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=22-10&rft.artnum=22&rft.issn=1478-7547&rft.eissn=1478-7547&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12962-022-00356-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2666685107%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-752e1a55724fa02fe98101167c72beb4c856a13dc723cff269e35af04def30883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2666685107&rft_id=info:pmid/35549719&rfr_iscdi=true |