Loading…

Can a Small Intestine Segment Be an Alternative Biological Conduit for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration?

Autologous nerve grafts are used to bridge peripheral nerve defects. Limited sources and donor site morbidity are the major problems with peripheral nerve grafts. Although various types of autologous grafts such as arteries, veins and muscles have been recommended, an ideal conduit has not yet been...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Balkan medical journal 2017-05, Vol.34 (3), p.246-254
Main Authors: Arda, Mehmet S, Koçman, Emre A, Özkara, Emre, Söztutar, Erdem, Özatik, Orhan, Köse, Aydan, Çetin, Cengiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Autologous nerve grafts are used to bridge peripheral nerve defects. Limited sources and donor site morbidity are the major problems with peripheral nerve grafts. Although various types of autologous grafts such as arteries, veins and muscles have been recommended, an ideal conduit has not yet been described. To investigate the effectiveness of a small intestinal conduit for peripheral nerve defects. Animal experimentation. Twenty-one rats were divided into three groups (n=7). Following anaesthesia, sciatic nerve exploration was performed in the Sham group. The 10 mm nerve gap was bridged with a 15 mm ileal segment in the small intestinal conduit group and the defect was replaced with orthotopic nerve in autologous nerve graft group. The functional recovery was tested monthly by walking-track analysis and the sciatic functional index. Histological evaluation was performed on the 12th week. Sciatic functional index tests are better in autologous nerve graft group (-55.09±6.35); however, during follow-up, progress in sciatic functional index was demonstrated, along with axonal regeneration and innervation of target muscles in the small intestinal conduit group (-76.36±12.08) (p
ISSN:2146-3123
2146-3131
DOI:10.4274/balkanmedj.2015.1601