Loading…

Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss

This study compares the performance between using load balancing bonding and not using load balancing bonding. This test was conducted on a virtual environment VMware and applied to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network. The configuration was carried out on two routers connected with three virt...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing 2024-11, Vol.8 (2), p.326-331
Main Authors: Farhan Toriq, Banu Santoso
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 331
container_issue 2
container_start_page 326
container_title Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing
container_volume 8
creator Farhan Toriq
Banu Santoso
description This study compares the performance between using load balancing bonding and not using load balancing bonding. This test was conducted on a virtual environment VMware and applied to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network. The configuration was carried out on two routers connected with three virtual cables that function as load balancing bonding, for the computer to function as a load balancing bonding test. In this study, the workload given consisted of 1000 package. The results of this study showed better performance with load balancing bonding compared to without load balancing bonding, shown in the default condition, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode being higher with a value of 0,157Mbps (Tx) and 3.4Mbps (Rx). Latency with Balance Round Robin mode is smaller with a value of 729ms. The average with Balance Round Robin mode is higher with a value of 768bps. While the packet loss has the same result, namely 0% no lost packets were found. In failover conditions, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode is still higher with a value of 0,107Mbps (Tx) and 2.2Mbps (Rx). The value is​​ obtained from testing conducted on Bandwidth Test and Traceroute tools. It can be concluded that the use of load balancing bonding can provide a significant effect on improving network performance both when used in default conditions and in failover conditions based on speed, failover, latency, average, packet loss parameters in the research that has been conducted.
doi_str_mv 10.30871/jaic.v8i2.8276
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e4</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e4</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e4</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjsFKAzEURYMgWLRrt-8DpmOSTtPM0kqLQhcF3bgKr8nLkHFMSjIU-veOxU9wdeBwOVzGHgWvl1yvxVOPwdZnHWSt5VrdsJlcNXqhtBJ3bF5KzzmXrZBKihn73HpPdoTkYZ_QwQYHjDbEDjYpul9idLDDMKQzZUgR3k9EroI9jhTtpYLnyWNH1XV4QPtF45Qq5YHdehwKzf94z95224-X14VL2JtTDt-YLyZhMFeRcmcwj8EOZKxquJZHe-RoG77yrW4VkiQ3PReKmuV_tn4AYjpgFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Farhan Toriq ; Banu Santoso</creator><creatorcontrib>Farhan Toriq ; Banu Santoso</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the performance between using load balancing bonding and not using load balancing bonding. This test was conducted on a virtual environment VMware and applied to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network. The configuration was carried out on two routers connected with three virtual cables that function as load balancing bonding, for the computer to function as a load balancing bonding test. In this study, the workload given consisted of 1000 package. The results of this study showed better performance with load balancing bonding compared to without load balancing bonding, shown in the default condition, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode being higher with a value of 0,157Mbps (Tx) and 3.4Mbps (Rx). Latency with Balance Round Robin mode is smaller with a value of 729ms. The average with Balance Round Robin mode is higher with a value of 768bps. While the packet loss has the same result, namely 0% no lost packets were found. In failover conditions, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode is still higher with a value of 0,107Mbps (Tx) and 2.2Mbps (Rx). The value is​​ obtained from testing conducted on Bandwidth Test and Traceroute tools. It can be concluded that the use of load balancing bonding can provide a significant effect on improving network performance both when used in default conditions and in failover conditions based on speed, failover, latency, average, packet loss parameters in the research that has been conducted.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2548-6861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30871/jaic.v8i2.8276</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Politeknik Negeri Batam</publisher><subject>assessment parameters ; bonding ; failover ; load balancing</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 2024-11, Vol.8 (2), p.326-331</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farhan Toriq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banu Santoso</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss</title><title>Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing</title><description>This study compares the performance between using load balancing bonding and not using load balancing bonding. This test was conducted on a virtual environment VMware and applied to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network. The configuration was carried out on two routers connected with three virtual cables that function as load balancing bonding, for the computer to function as a load balancing bonding test. In this study, the workload given consisted of 1000 package. The results of this study showed better performance with load balancing bonding compared to without load balancing bonding, shown in the default condition, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode being higher with a value of 0,157Mbps (Tx) and 3.4Mbps (Rx). Latency with Balance Round Robin mode is smaller with a value of 729ms. The average with Balance Round Robin mode is higher with a value of 768bps. While the packet loss has the same result, namely 0% no lost packets were found. In failover conditions, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode is still higher with a value of 0,107Mbps (Tx) and 2.2Mbps (Rx). The value is​​ obtained from testing conducted on Bandwidth Test and Traceroute tools. It can be concluded that the use of load balancing bonding can provide a significant effect on improving network performance both when used in default conditions and in failover conditions based on speed, failover, latency, average, packet loss parameters in the research that has been conducted.</description><subject>assessment parameters</subject><subject>bonding</subject><subject>failover</subject><subject>load balancing</subject><issn>2548-6861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjsFKAzEURYMgWLRrt-8DpmOSTtPM0kqLQhcF3bgKr8nLkHFMSjIU-veOxU9wdeBwOVzGHgWvl1yvxVOPwdZnHWSt5VrdsJlcNXqhtBJ3bF5KzzmXrZBKihn73HpPdoTkYZ_QwQYHjDbEDjYpul9idLDDMKQzZUgR3k9EroI9jhTtpYLnyWNH1XV4QPtF45Qq5YHdehwKzf94z95224-X14VL2JtTDt-YLyZhMFeRcmcwj8EOZKxquJZHe-RoG77yrW4VkiQ3PReKmuV_tn4AYjpgFw</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Farhan Toriq</creator><creator>Banu Santoso</creator><general>Politeknik Negeri Batam</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss</title><author>Farhan Toriq ; Banu Santoso</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>assessment parameters</topic><topic>bonding</topic><topic>failover</topic><topic>load balancing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farhan Toriq</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banu Santoso</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farhan Toriq</au><au>Banu Santoso</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing</jtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>331</epage><pages>326-331</pages><eissn>2548-6861</eissn><abstract>This study compares the performance between using load balancing bonding and not using load balancing bonding. This test was conducted on a virtual environment VMware and applied to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) network. The configuration was carried out on two routers connected with three virtual cables that function as load balancing bonding, for the computer to function as a load balancing bonding test. In this study, the workload given consisted of 1000 package. The results of this study showed better performance with load balancing bonding compared to without load balancing bonding, shown in the default condition, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode being higher with a value of 0,157Mbps (Tx) and 3.4Mbps (Rx). Latency with Balance Round Robin mode is smaller with a value of 729ms. The average with Balance Round Robin mode is higher with a value of 768bps. While the packet loss has the same result, namely 0% no lost packets were found. In failover conditions, the speed with Balance Round Robin mode is still higher with a value of 0,107Mbps (Tx) and 2.2Mbps (Rx). The value is​​ obtained from testing conducted on Bandwidth Test and Traceroute tools. It can be concluded that the use of load balancing bonding can provide a significant effect on improving network performance both when used in default conditions and in failover conditions based on speed, failover, latency, average, packet loss parameters in the research that has been conducted.</abstract><pub>Politeknik Negeri Batam</pub><doi>10.30871/jaic.v8i2.8276</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2548-6861
ispartof Journal of Applied Informatics and Computing, 2024-11, Vol.8 (2), p.326-331
issn 2548-6861
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e4
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects assessment parameters
bonding
failover
load balancing
title Effect of Load Balancing Bonding and Failover on Speed, Latency, Average, and Packet Loss
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T19%3A59%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Load%20Balancing%20Bonding%20and%20Failover%20on%20Speed,%20Latency,%20Average,%20and%20Packet%20Loss&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Informatics%20and%20Computing&rft.au=Farhan%20Toriq&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=331&rft.pages=326-331&rft.eissn=2548-6861&rft_id=info:doi/10.30871/jaic.v8i2.8276&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e4%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c64082bcb0ac405f9896ae2ed00016e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true