Loading…
Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India
To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India. We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.437-445 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 445 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 437 |
container_title | Bulletin of the World Health Organization |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | FLOYD, Katherine ARORA, V. K MURTHY, K. J. R LONNROTH, Knut SINGLA, Neeta AKBAR, Y ZIGNOL, Matteo UPLEKAR, Mukund |
description | To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India.
We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated.
The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs.
PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2471/BLT.05.024109 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c681a10fd4ed4100ab1ce81d6fe363cb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c681a10fd4ed4100ab1ce81d6fe363cb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>68571017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s2L1DAYBvAiijuuHr1KEFy8dHzznexBcMevgZFdcPQa0jRZO3SaNWkH_O-NzuC6Hpxe-pL-eCBP36p6imFOmMSvLlbrOfA5EIZB36tmmAtWgwB2v5oBMFJrocRJ9SjnDZRHM3hYnWAhtZZEzqqvi5hHZIcWuTLUPgTvxm7nB58zigFdXX2q316uP6MQExqnxic39TF3ufhhTLFH58jvutYPzqOQ4hYth7azj6sHwfbZPzm8T6sv79-tFx_r1eWH5eLNqnZCqrHmXjSUOa9DY6nWQAUQThpssWiwbIlsFeVOWcGsZYEw0BYEozYwVWbq6Gm13Oe20W7MTeq2Nv0w0Xbm90FM18amsXO9N06okguhZb4tXYFtsPMKtyJ4KqhrStbrfdbN1Gx963y5n-3vhN79MnTfzHXcGSKIpEKWgLNDQIrfJ59Hs-2y831vBx-nbITiEgM-DrkEJjhmRyEtCDMGRyHBuFSLdYEv_wuxYrKUiwUv9Pk_dBOnNJTfaQjRXFHNREH1HrkUc04-_OkLg_m1oKYsqAFu9gta_LO_S77Vh40s4MUB2OxsH5IdXJdvnVScaRD0JwXw6y8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229583946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>FLOYD, Katherine ; ARORA, V. K ; MURTHY, K. J. R ; LONNROTH, Knut ; SINGLA, Neeta ; AKBAR, Y ; ZIGNOL, Matteo ; UPLEKAR, Mukund</creator><creatorcontrib>FLOYD, Katherine ; ARORA, V. K ; MURTHY, K. J. R ; LONNROTH, Knut ; SINGLA, Neeta ; AKBAR, Y ; ZIGNOL, Matteo ; UPLEKAR, Mukund</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India.
We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated.
The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs.
PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9686</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1564-0604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2471/BLT.05.024109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16799727</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BWHOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Genève: Organisation mondiale de la santé</publisher><subject>Bacterial diseases ; Benefit cost analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical outcomes ; Control ; Cost analysis ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost reduction ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Drugs ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Expenditures ; General aspects ; Health Care Costs ; Health care expenditures ; Human bacterial diseases ; India ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Miscellaneous ; Observation ; Patients ; Physicians ; Pilot projects ; Private Sector ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public Sector ; Public-Private partnerships ; Treatment Outcome ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis - economics ; Tuberculosis - prevention & control ; Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.437-445</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright World Health Organization Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/229583946/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/229583946?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11688,12847,21387,21394,27866,27924,27925,31000,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,53791,53793,74221,74468,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17854906$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16799727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FLOYD, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARORA, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURTHY, K. J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONNROTH, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGLA, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKBAR, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIGNOL, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UPLEKAR, Mukund</creatorcontrib><title>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</title><title>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</title><addtitle>Bull World Health Organ</addtitle><description>To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India.
We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated.
The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs.
PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.</description><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pilot projects</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public Sector</subject><subject>Public-Private partnerships</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - prevention & control</subject><subject>Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</subject><issn>0042-9686</issn><issn>1564-0604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0s2L1DAYBvAiijuuHr1KEFy8dHzznexBcMevgZFdcPQa0jRZO3SaNWkH_O-NzuC6Hpxe-pL-eCBP36p6imFOmMSvLlbrOfA5EIZB36tmmAtWgwB2v5oBMFJrocRJ9SjnDZRHM3hYnWAhtZZEzqqvi5hHZIcWuTLUPgTvxm7nB58zigFdXX2q316uP6MQExqnxic39TF3ufhhTLFH58jvutYPzqOQ4hYth7azj6sHwfbZPzm8T6sv79-tFx_r1eWH5eLNqnZCqrHmXjSUOa9DY6nWQAUQThpssWiwbIlsFeVOWcGsZYEw0BYEozYwVWbq6Gm13Oe20W7MTeq2Nv0w0Xbm90FM18amsXO9N06okguhZb4tXYFtsPMKtyJ4KqhrStbrfdbN1Gx963y5n-3vhN79MnTfzHXcGSKIpEKWgLNDQIrfJ59Hs-2y831vBx-nbITiEgM-DrkEJjhmRyEtCDMGRyHBuFSLdYEv_wuxYrKUiwUv9Pk_dBOnNJTfaQjRXFHNREH1HrkUc04-_OkLg_m1oKYsqAFu9gta_LO_S77Vh40s4MUB2OxsH5IdXJdvnVScaRD0JwXw6y8</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>FLOYD, Katherine</creator><creator>ARORA, V. K</creator><creator>MURTHY, K. J. R</creator><creator>LONNROTH, Knut</creator><creator>SINGLA, Neeta</creator><creator>AKBAR, Y</creator><creator>ZIGNOL, Matteo</creator><creator>UPLEKAR, Mukund</creator><general>Organisation mondiale de la santé</general><general>World Health Organization</general><general>The World Health Organization</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</title><author>FLOYD, Katherine ; ARORA, V. K ; MURTHY, K. J. R ; LONNROTH, Knut ; SINGLA, Neeta ; AKBAR, Y ; ZIGNOL, Matteo ; UPLEKAR, Mukund</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pilot projects</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public Sector</topic><topic>Public-Private partnerships</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - prevention & control</topic><topic>Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FLOYD, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARORA, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURTHY, K. J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONNROTH, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGLA, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKBAR, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIGNOL, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UPLEKAR, Mukund</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FLOYD, Katherine</au><au>ARORA, V. K</au><au>MURTHY, K. J. R</au><au>LONNROTH, Knut</au><au>SINGLA, Neeta</au><au>AKBAR, Y</au><au>ZIGNOL, Matteo</au><au>UPLEKAR, Mukund</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</jtitle><addtitle>Bull World Health Organ</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>437-445</pages><issn>0042-9686</issn><eissn>1564-0604</eissn><coden>BWHOA6</coden><abstract>To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India.
We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated.
The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs.
PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.</abstract><cop>Genève</cop><pub>Organisation mondiale de la santé</pub><pmid>16799727</pmid><doi>10.2471/BLT.05.024109</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-9686 |
ispartof | Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.437-445 |
issn | 0042-9686 1564-0604 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c681a10fd4ed4100ab1ce81d6fe363cb |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Open Access: PubMed Central; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; PAIS Index |
subjects | Bacterial diseases Benefit cost analysis Biological and medical sciences Clinical outcomes Control Cost analysis Cost effectiveness Cost reduction Cost-Benefit Analysis Drugs Evidence-Based Medicine Expenditures General aspects Health Care Costs Health care expenditures Human bacterial diseases India Infectious diseases Medical sciences Medical treatment Miscellaneous Observation Patients Physicians Pilot projects Private Sector Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Public Sector Public-Private partnerships Treatment Outcome Tuberculosis Tuberculosis - economics Tuberculosis - prevention & control Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections |
title | Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A21%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20and%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20PPM-DOTS%20for%20tuberculosis%20control%20:%20evidence%20from%20India&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20World%20Health%20Organization&rft.au=FLOYD,%20Katherine&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=437-445&rft.issn=0042-9686&rft.eissn=1564-0604&rft.coden=BWHOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.2471/BLT.05.024109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E68571017%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229583946&rft_id=info:pmid/16799727&rfr_iscdi=true |