Loading…

Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India

To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India. We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.437-445
Main Authors: FLOYD, Katherine, ARORA, V. K, MURTHY, K. J. R, LONNROTH, Knut, SINGLA, Neeta, AKBAR, Y, ZIGNOL, Matteo, UPLEKAR, Mukund
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3
cites
container_end_page 445
container_issue 6
container_start_page 437
container_title Bulletin of the World Health Organization
container_volume 84
creator FLOYD, Katherine
ARORA, V. K
MURTHY, K. J. R
LONNROTH, Knut
SINGLA, Neeta
AKBAR, Y
ZIGNOL, Matteo
UPLEKAR, Mukund
description To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India. We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated. The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs. PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.
doi_str_mv 10.2471/BLT.05.024109
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c681a10fd4ed4100ab1ce81d6fe363cb</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c681a10fd4ed4100ab1ce81d6fe363cb</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>68571017</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0s2L1DAYBvAiijuuHr1KEFy8dHzznexBcMevgZFdcPQa0jRZO3SaNWkH_O-NzuC6Hpxe-pL-eCBP36p6imFOmMSvLlbrOfA5EIZB36tmmAtWgwB2v5oBMFJrocRJ9SjnDZRHM3hYnWAhtZZEzqqvi5hHZIcWuTLUPgTvxm7nB58zigFdXX2q316uP6MQExqnxic39TF3ufhhTLFH58jvutYPzqOQ4hYth7azj6sHwfbZPzm8T6sv79-tFx_r1eWH5eLNqnZCqrHmXjSUOa9DY6nWQAUQThpssWiwbIlsFeVOWcGsZYEw0BYEozYwVWbq6Gm13Oe20W7MTeq2Nv0w0Xbm90FM18amsXO9N06okguhZb4tXYFtsPMKtyJ4KqhrStbrfdbN1Gx963y5n-3vhN79MnTfzHXcGSKIpEKWgLNDQIrfJ59Hs-2y831vBx-nbITiEgM-DrkEJjhmRyEtCDMGRyHBuFSLdYEv_wuxYrKUiwUv9Pk_dBOnNJTfaQjRXFHNREH1HrkUc04-_OkLg_m1oKYsqAFu9gta_LO_S77Vh40s4MUB2OxsH5IdXJdvnVScaRD0JwXw6y8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>229583946</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>FLOYD, Katherine ; ARORA, V. K ; MURTHY, K. J. R ; LONNROTH, Knut ; SINGLA, Neeta ; AKBAR, Y ; ZIGNOL, Matteo ; UPLEKAR, Mukund</creator><creatorcontrib>FLOYD, Katherine ; ARORA, V. K ; MURTHY, K. J. R ; LONNROTH, Knut ; SINGLA, Neeta ; AKBAR, Y ; ZIGNOL, Matteo ; UPLEKAR, Mukund</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India. We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated. The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs. PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9686</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1564-0604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2471/BLT.05.024109</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16799727</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BWHOA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Genève: Organisation mondiale de la santé</publisher><subject>Bacterial diseases ; Benefit cost analysis ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical outcomes ; Control ; Cost analysis ; Cost effectiveness ; Cost reduction ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Drugs ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Expenditures ; General aspects ; Health Care Costs ; Health care expenditures ; Human bacterial diseases ; India ; Infectious diseases ; Medical sciences ; Medical treatment ; Miscellaneous ; Observation ; Patients ; Physicians ; Pilot projects ; Private Sector ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Public Sector ; Public-Private partnerships ; Treatment Outcome ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis - economics ; Tuberculosis - prevention &amp; control ; Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.437-445</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright World Health Organization Jun 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/229583946/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/229583946?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,11688,12847,21387,21394,27866,27924,27925,31000,33223,33224,33611,33612,33985,33986,36060,36061,43733,43948,44363,53791,53793,74221,74468,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17854906$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16799727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FLOYD, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARORA, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURTHY, K. J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONNROTH, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGLA, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKBAR, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIGNOL, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UPLEKAR, Mukund</creatorcontrib><title>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</title><title>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</title><addtitle>Bull World Health Organ</addtitle><description>To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India. We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated. The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs. PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.</description><subject>Bacterial diseases</subject><subject>Benefit cost analysis</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost effectiveness</subject><subject>Cost reduction</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health Care Costs</subject><subject>Health care expenditures</subject><subject>Human bacterial diseases</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pilot projects</subject><subject>Private Sector</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Public Sector</subject><subject>Public-Private partnerships</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - economics</subject><subject>Tuberculosis - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</subject><issn>0042-9686</issn><issn>1564-0604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0s2L1DAYBvAiijuuHr1KEFy8dHzznexBcMevgZFdcPQa0jRZO3SaNWkH_O-NzuC6Hpxe-pL-eCBP36p6imFOmMSvLlbrOfA5EIZB36tmmAtWgwB2v5oBMFJrocRJ9SjnDZRHM3hYnWAhtZZEzqqvi5hHZIcWuTLUPgTvxm7nB58zigFdXX2q316uP6MQExqnxic39TF3ufhhTLFH58jvutYPzqOQ4hYth7azj6sHwfbZPzm8T6sv79-tFx_r1eWH5eLNqnZCqrHmXjSUOa9DY6nWQAUQThpssWiwbIlsFeVOWcGsZYEw0BYEozYwVWbq6Gm13Oe20W7MTeq2Nv0w0Xbm90FM18amsXO9N06okguhZb4tXYFtsPMKtyJ4KqhrStbrfdbN1Gx963y5n-3vhN79MnTfzHXcGSKIpEKWgLNDQIrfJ59Hs-2y831vBx-nbITiEgM-DrkEJjhmRyEtCDMGRyHBuFSLdYEv_wuxYrKUiwUv9Pk_dBOnNJTfaQjRXFHNREH1HrkUc04-_OkLg_m1oKYsqAFu9gta_LO_S77Vh40s4MUB2OxsH5IdXJdvnVScaRD0JwXw6y8</recordid><startdate>20060601</startdate><enddate>20060601</enddate><creator>FLOYD, Katherine</creator><creator>ARORA, V. K</creator><creator>MURTHY, K. J. R</creator><creator>LONNROTH, Knut</creator><creator>SINGLA, Neeta</creator><creator>AKBAR, Y</creator><creator>ZIGNOL, Matteo</creator><creator>UPLEKAR, Mukund</creator><general>Organisation mondiale de la santé</general><general>World Health Organization</general><general>The World Health Organization</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060601</creationdate><title>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</title><author>FLOYD, Katherine ; ARORA, V. K ; MURTHY, K. J. R ; LONNROTH, Knut ; SINGLA, Neeta ; AKBAR, Y ; ZIGNOL, Matteo ; UPLEKAR, Mukund</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bacterial diseases</topic><topic>Benefit cost analysis</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost effectiveness</topic><topic>Cost reduction</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health Care Costs</topic><topic>Health care expenditures</topic><topic>Human bacterial diseases</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pilot projects</topic><topic>Private Sector</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Public Sector</topic><topic>Public-Private partnerships</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - economics</topic><topic>Tuberculosis - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FLOYD, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARORA, V. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MURTHY, K. J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LONNROTH, Knut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SINGLA, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKBAR, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIGNOL, Matteo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>UPLEKAR, Mukund</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FLOYD, Katherine</au><au>ARORA, V. K</au><au>MURTHY, K. J. R</au><au>LONNROTH, Knut</au><au>SINGLA, Neeta</au><au>AKBAR, Y</au><au>ZIGNOL, Matteo</au><au>UPLEKAR, Mukund</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the World Health Organization</jtitle><addtitle>Bull World Health Organ</addtitle><date>2006-06-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>437</spage><epage>445</epage><pages>437-445</pages><issn>0042-9686</issn><eissn>1564-0604</eissn><coden>BWHOA6</coden><abstract>To assess the cost and cost-effectiveness of the Public-Private Mix DOTS (PPM-DOTS) strategy for tuberculosis (TB) control in India. We collected data on the costs and effects of pilot PPM-DOTS projects in Delhi and Hyderabad using documentary data and interviews. The cost of PPM-DOTS was compared with public sector DOTS (i.e. DOTS delivered through public sector facilities only) and non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. Costs for 2002 in US$ were assessed for the public sector, private practitioners, and patients/attendants. Effectiveness was measured as the number of cases successfully treated. The average cost per patient treated was US$ 111-123 for PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS, and US$ 111-172 for non-DOTS treatment in the private sector. From the public sector's perspective, the cost per patient treated was lower in PPM-DOTS projects than in public sector DOTS programmes (US$ 24-33 versus US$ 63). DOTS implementation in either the public or private sectors improved treatment outcomes and substantially lowered costs incurred by patients and their attendants, compared to non-DOTS treatment in the private sector (US$ 50-60 for DOTS compared to over US$ 100 for non-DOTS). The average cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS and public sector DOTS was similar, at US$ 120-140 per patient successfully treated, compared to US$ 218-338 for non-DOTS private sector treatment. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis showed that PPM-DOTS can improve effectiveness while also lowering costs. PPM-DOTS can be an affordable and cost-effective approach to improving TB control in India, and can substantially lower the economic burden of TB for patients.</abstract><cop>Genève</cop><pub>Organisation mondiale de la santé</pub><pmid>16799727</pmid><doi>10.2471/BLT.05.024109</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-9686
ispartof Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 2006-06, Vol.84 (6), p.437-445
issn 0042-9686
1564-0604
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c681a10fd4ed4100ab1ce81d6fe363cb
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Open Access: PubMed Central; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Bacterial diseases
Benefit cost analysis
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical outcomes
Control
Cost analysis
Cost effectiveness
Cost reduction
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Drugs
Evidence-Based Medicine
Expenditures
General aspects
Health Care Costs
Health care expenditures
Human bacterial diseases
India
Infectious diseases
Medical sciences
Medical treatment
Miscellaneous
Observation
Patients
Physicians
Pilot projects
Private Sector
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Public Sector
Public-Private partnerships
Treatment Outcome
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis - economics
Tuberculosis - prevention & control
Tuberculosis and atypical mycobacterial infections
title Cost and cost-effectiveness of PPM-DOTS for tuberculosis control : evidence from India
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A21%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost%20and%20cost-effectiveness%20of%20PPM-DOTS%20for%20tuberculosis%20control%20:%20evidence%20from%20India&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20World%20Health%20Organization&rft.au=FLOYD,%20Katherine&rft.date=2006-06-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=437&rft.epage=445&rft.pages=437-445&rft.issn=0042-9686&rft.eissn=1564-0604&rft.coden=BWHOA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.2471/BLT.05.024109&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E68571017%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c678t-5e6b34ce9fba3990360252b1a16b17d27d835c8a64aa4f2409a0643af484093c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=229583946&rft_id=info:pmid/16799727&rfr_iscdi=true