Loading…
Shock absorption of 3D-printed ABS and fabric for sports faceguard
Sports faceguards (FG) to protect the maxillofacial area get sweaty due to bad air permeability. To solve this problem, a combination of 3D-printed perforated acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and knitted fabric with honeycomb structure (AKE) is considered as one option but it was unclear whethe...
Saved in:
Published in: | International dental journal 2021-09, Vol.71, p.S47-S48 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Sports faceguards (FG) to protect the maxillofacial area get sweaty due to bad air permeability. To solve this problem, a combination of 3D-printed perforated acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and knitted fabric with honeycomb structure (AKE) is considered as one option but it was unclear whether the combination have enough shock absorption ability or not. The aim of this study was to test the shock absorption ability of the various combination of 3D-printed materials compared with conventional FG.
3D-printed ABS sheets (100 mm square, 3 mm thick) were prepared with 5 different perforated patterns; ABS0 without hole, ABS10S with 2.52 mm round holes/10 % open area, ABS10 with 3.60 mm RHs/10 % OA, ABS20S with 2.56 mm RHs/20 % OA and ABS20 with 3.57 mm RHs/20 % OA. The hole arrangement was unified in the 45-degree staggered formation. The impact test was performed on each specimen with AKE (n=5 for each). The combination of polycaprolactone sheet without hole and polychloroprene rubber cushioning material was used as a control. The maximum loads, maximum stress and stress impressed area were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA with Dunnett's Test or Tukey HSD test (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0020-6539 1875-595X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.identj.2021.08.041 |