Perirenal fat stranding is not a powerful diagnostic tool for acute pyelonephritis [Corrigendum]

Fukami H, Takeuchi Y, Kagaya S, et al. Int J Gen Med. 2017;10:137-144.Page 137, Abstract, Results, the text "The frequency of PFS was 72% in the pyelonephritis group vs 39% in the control group" should read "The frequency of PFS was 72% in the pyelonephritis group vs 29% in the contro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of general medicine 2018-01, Vol.11, p.79-80
Main Authors: Fukami, H, Takeuchi, Y, Kagaya, S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Corrigendum
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Fukami H, Takeuchi Y, Kagaya S, et al. Int J Gen Med. 2017;10:137-144.Page 137, Abstract, Results, the text "The frequency of PFS was 72% in the pyelonephritis group vs 39% in the control group" should read "The frequency of PFS was 72% in the pyelonephritis group vs 29% in the control group".Page 140, Table 1, Control (PRB) column, last row, the data "93 (39%)" should read "93 (29%)".Page 141, Discussion, line 5, the text "PFS was found in 39% of patients" should read "PFS was found in 72% of patients".Read the original article
ISSN:1178-7074
1178-7074
DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S164399