Discordance in diagnosis of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Chinese elderly men

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic translation 2019-07, Vol.18, p.59-64
• Main Authors: Xu, Xiao-ming, Li, Na, Li, Kai, Li, Xiao-Yu, Zhang, Ping, Xuan, Yan-jiao, Cheng, Xiao-guang
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bone mineral density; Dual X-ray absorptiometry; Original; Osteoporosis; Quantitative computed tomography
• ISSN: 2214-031X; 2214-0328
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.11.003

The objective of this study was to investigate the diagnostic discordance of osteoporosis by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in Chinese elderly men. A total of 313 males older than 60 years, who underwent both spinal QCT and lumbar spine and hip DXA in our department, were included. The diagnostic criteria established by the World Health Organisation in 1994 were used for DXA to diagnose osteoporosis, and the criteria recommended by the International Society of Clinical Densitometry were used for QCT. The osteoporosis detection rate by the two techniques was calculated, and the difference was compared. The minor discordance was considered present when the different diagnostic classes between the two techniques were adjacent. Major discordance was present when the diagnosis by one technique was osteoporosis and the other was normal. The computed tomography images were reviewed by radiologists to assess whether vertebral fracture, aorta calcification or degeneration was present. In the 313 participants (mean age, 79.6 ± 7.2 years), the osteoporosis detection rate was 10.9% for DXA (lumbar spine and hip) and 45.1% for QCT, a significant difference (p