Hemostatic Powders in Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: The Open Questions

• Published in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Lithuania), 2023-01, Vol.59 (1), p.143
• Main Authors: Paoluzi, Omero Alessandro, Troncone, Edoardo, De Cristofaro, Elena, Sibilia, Mezia, Monteleone, Giovanni, Del Vecchio Blanco, Giovanna
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: ankaferd blood stopper; Blood platelets; Catheters; CEGP-003; Disease; endoclot; Endoscopy; Epidermal growth factor; gastrointestinal bleeding; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage - drug therapy; hemospray; Hemostasis, Endoscopic - methods; hemostatic powders; Hemostatics - therapeutic use; Humans; Hydrogels; Metastasis; Peptic Ulcer; Powders - therapeutic use; Review; Treatment Outcome; Ulcers; Wound healing
• ISSN: 1648-9144; 1010-660X; 1648-9144
• DOI: 10.3390/medicina59010143

Hemostatic powder (HP) is a relatively recent addition to the arsenal of hemostatic endoscopic procedures (HEPs) for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) due to benign and malignant lesions. Five types of HP are currently available: TC-325 (Hemospray™), EndoClot™, Ankaferd Blood Stopper , and, more recently, UI-EWD (Nexpowder ) and CEGP-003 (CGBio™). HP acts as a mechanical barrier and/or promotes platelet activation and coagulation cascade. HP may be used in combination with or as rescue therapy in case of failure of conventional HEPs (CHEPs) and also as monotherapy in large, poorly accessible lesions with multiple bleeding sources. Although the literature on HP is abundant, randomized controlled trials are scant, and some questions remain open. While HP is highly effective in inducing immediate hemostasis in GIB, the rates of rebleeding reported in different studies are very variable, and conditions affecting the stability of hemostasis have not yet been fully elucidated. It is not established whether HP as monotherapy is appropriate in severe GIB, such as spurting peptic ulcers, or should be used only as rescue or adjunctive therapy. Finally, as it can be sprayed on large areas, HP could become the gold standard in malignancy-related GIB, which is often nonresponsive or not amenable to treatment with CHEPs as a result of multiple bleeding points and friable surfaces. This is a narrative review that provides an overview of currently available data and the open questions regarding the use of HP in the management of non-variceal upper GIB due to benign and malignant diseases.