Loading…

Variations in the Uptake of Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer and Its Impact on Outcomes

Men from regions with a high active surveillance (AS) uptake had a lower risk of transition from AS to radical treatment, but not a higher risk of AS failure. A low AS uptake suggests overtreatment. Regional differences in active surveillance (AS) uptake for prostate cancer (PC) illustrate an inequa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European urology open science (Online) 2023-06, Vol.52, p.166-173
Main Authors: Ahlberg, Mats S., Garmo, Hans, Holmberg, Lars, Bill-Axelson, Anna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Men from regions with a high active surveillance (AS) uptake had a lower risk of transition from AS to radical treatment, but not a higher risk of AS failure. A low AS uptake suggests overtreatment. Regional differences in active surveillance (AS) uptake for prostate cancer (PC) illustrate an inequality in treatment strategies. To examine the association between regional differences in AS uptake and transition to radical treatment, start of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), watchful waiting, or death. A Swedish population-based cohort study was conducted including men in the National Prostate Cancer Register in Sweden with low-risk or favorable intermediate-risk PC, starting AS from January 1, 2007 and continuing till December 31, 2019. Regional tradition of low, intermediate, or high proportions of immediate radical treatment. Probabilities of transition from AS to radical treatment, start of ADT, watchful waiting, or death from other causes were assessed. We included 13 679 men. The median age was 66 yr, median PSA 5.1 ng/ml, and median follow-up 5.7 yr. Men from regions with a high AS uptake had a lower probability of transition to radical treatment (36%) than men from regions with a low AS uptake (40%; absolute difference 4.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–7.2), but not a higher probability of AS failure defined as the start of ADT (absolute difference 0.4%; 95% CI –0.7 to 1.4). There were no statistically significant differences in the probability of transition to watchful waiting or death from other causes. Limitations include uncertainty in the estimation of remaining lifetime and transition to watchful waiting. A regional tradition of a high AS uptake is associated with a lower probability of transition to radical treatment, but not with AS failure. A low AS uptake suggests overtreatment. There are considerable regional differences in active surveillance (AS) uptake for prostate cancer. This study compared the outcomes of AS in different regions and found no association between AS uptake and failure of AS; it suggests that a low AS uptake indicates overtreatment.
ISSN:2666-1683
2666-1691
2666-1683
DOI:10.1016/j.euros.2023.04.006