Comparative study of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder dislocation

Objectives The primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. The secondary aims were to assess and compare the surgical cost, patient satisfaction, and compl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of international medical research 2021-04, Vol.49 (4), p.3000605211007328-3000605211007328
Main Authors: Rai, Saroj, Tamang, Nira, Sharma, Laxmi Kanta, Marasini, Rudra Prasad, Singh, Janith Lal, Khanal, Kiran, Ghimire KC, Milan, Sherchan, Binod
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arthroscopy
Clinical outcomes
Female
Humans
Joint Instability
Male
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Operating costs
Patient satisfaction
Recurrence
Retrospective Clinical Research Report
Retrospective Studies
Shoulder Dislocation - surgery
Shoulder Joint - surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives The primary aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure for recurrent dislocation of the shoulder. The secondary aims were to assess and compare the surgical cost, patient satisfaction, and complications, including recurrence and infection. Methods We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of all consecutive patients undergoing either arthroscopic Bankart repair or the open Latarjet procedure from May 2015 to May 2018 with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Forty-one patients (32 men, 9 women) in the Bankart group and 40 patients (34 men, 6 women) in the Latarjet group were available for the final follow-up. Results There were no statistically significant differences in the demographic parameters or clinical outcomes between the two groups. Functional satisfaction was higher with the Latarjet procedure. Bankart repair had a significantly higher operating cost than the Latarjet procedure. Three patients in the Bankart group and no patients in the Latarjet group developed recurrence. Conclusion Both procedures provided satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, the Latarjet group had a higher rate of functional satisfaction and lower operating cost, and there was a trend toward higher recurrence in the arthroscopic Bankart group.
ISSN:0300-0605
1473-2300
DOI:10.1177/03000605211007328