The diverse socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching

• Published in: Conservation science and practice 2024-07, Vol.6 (7), p.n/a
• Main Authors: Denner, Candice, Clements, Hayley S., Child, Matthew F., De Vos, Alta
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agricultural economics; Agriculture; Biodiversity; Breeding; Business models; Case studies; Cluster analysis; Clustering; diversification; Economic impact; Ecotourism; Expansion; Farming; Farms; game ranching; Hunting; Job creation; Land use; Landowners; Livestock; Meat; National parks; Private property; Ranches; Ranching; socioeconomic contributions; Socioeconomic factors; Socioeconomics; State budgets; Sustainable development; Wildlife; Wildlife conservation; wildlife economy
• ISSN: 2578-4854; 2578-4854
• DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13166

The expansion of wildlife ranching has been broadly linked to conservation benefits, job creation, and economic contributions. However, a more nuanced understanding of the socioeconomic contributions of wildlife ranching accounting for the enterprise diversity in the sector remains a major limitation to assessing its potential to contribute to sustainable development. We assessed several important socioeconomic contributions of diverse wildlife‐based business models, defined by their main revenue‐generating activities, within the South African wildlife ranching industry, and the financial viability of these models. Owners and managers of privately‐owned wildlife ranches and conventional agricultural farms (for comparative purposes) were interviewed in the Eastern Cape (112 ranches; 24 farms) and Limpopo provinces (152 ranches; 4 farms). We used a hierarchical clustering analysis to delineate six wildlife ranching business models. These included three more specialized models: ecotourism, trophy hunting, and wildlife breeding, and three more mixed models: mixed hunting (i.e., both meat and trophy hunting), mixed wildlife‐agriculture, and trophy hunting‐game meat. In general, ecotourism‐focused ranches employed more people in total and per hectare (median = 23 jobs; 0.008/ha), and a higher proportion of women and skilled employees (41% and 45% of employees, respectively) than the other ranching models (median = 7–21 jobs; 0.002–0.005/ha) and conventional agriculture (median = 12 jobs; 0.004/ha). Trophy hunting‐focused ranches employed the second highest number of people per hectare (0.006) although on average, a third of these jobs were seasonal. Trophy hunting ranches tended to be more profitable (median profit margin = 33%) than ecotourism (−10%), wildlife breeding (0%) and mixed‐hunting (12%) ranches, though ecotourism ranches showed very high variability (interquartile range = −32% to 14%). These findings advance our understanding of the distinct socioeconomic contributions of diverse wildlife ranches, which benefits policy discourse and implementation surrounding the industry, promoting improved industry sustainability and inclusive growth. The study identifies six distinct wildlife ranching business models in South Africa, including ecotourism, trophy hunting, wildlife breeding, mixed hunting, mixed wildlife‐agriculture, and trophy hunting‐game meat and compares their socioeconomic contributions with conventional agricultural farms. Socioeconomic contri