Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration

• Published in: International journal of molecular sciences 2021-03, Vol.22 (7), p.3588
• Main Authors: Oberdiek, Franciska, Vargas, Carlos Ivan, Rider, Patrick, Batinic, Milijana, Görke, Oliver, Radenković, Milena, Najman, Stevo, Baena, Jose Manuel, Jung, Ole, Barbeck, Mike
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: 3D-printing; Animals; Biocompatibility; Biocompatible Materials - chemistry; Biodegradability; Biological activity; Biomedical materials; bioprinting; biphasic bone substitute; Bone biomaterials; Bone Development; Bone growth; Bone Regeneration - drug effects; Bone Regeneration - physiology; Bone Substitutes - chemistry; Bones; Calcium phosphates; Calvaria; Composite materials; Connective tissue; Design; Fibroblasts; Fused deposition modeling; Granulocytes; Hydroxyapatites - pharmacology; Immunology; Implantation; in vivo; In vivo methods and tests; inflammation; macrophages; Male; Manufacturing; Mechanical properties; Mechanical tests; Osteoconduction; Osteogenesis; Polycaprolactone; Polyesters - chemistry; Porosity; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Regeneration; Regeneration (physiology); Scaffolds; Skin & tissue grafts; Software; Stress-strain curves; Structural stability; Substitute bone; Surgical implants; Tissue engineering; Tissue Scaffolds - chemistry; Yield stress
• ISSN: 1422-0067; 1661-6596; 1422-0067
• DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073588

(1) Background: The aim of this study was examining the ex vivo and in vivo properties of a composite made from polycaprolactone (PCL) and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) (synprint, ScientiFY GmbH) fabricated via fused deposition modelling (FDM); (2) Methods: Scaffolds were tested ex vivo for their mechanical properties using porous and solid designs. Subcutaneous implantation model analyzed the biocompatibility of PCL + BCP and PCL scaffolds. Calvaria implantation model analyzed the osteoconductive properties of PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds compared to BCP as control group. Established histological, histopathological and histomorphometrical methods were performed to evaluate new bone formation.; (3) Results Mechanical testing demonstrated no significant differences between PCL and PCL + BCP for both designs. Similar biocompatibility was observed subcutaneously for PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds. In the calvaria model, new bone formation was observed for all groups with largest new bone formation in the BCP group, followed by the PCL + BCP group, and the PCL group. This finding was influenced by the initial volume of biomaterial implanted and remaining volume after 90 days. All materials showed osteoconductive properties and PCL + BCP tailored the tissue responses towards higher cellular biodegradability. Moreover, this material combination led to a reduced swelling in PCL + BCP; (4) Conclusions: Altogether, the results show that the newly developed composite is biocompatible and leads to successful osteoconductive bone regeneration. The new biomaterial combines the structural stability provided by PCL with bioactive characteristics of BCP-based BSM. 3D-printed BSM provides an integration behavior in accordance with the concept of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by directing new bone growth for proper function and restoration.