Aerosol optical properties within the atmospheric boundary layer predicted from ground-based observations compared to Raman lidar retrievals during RITA-2021

• Published in: Atmospheric chemistry and physics 2024-08, Vol.24 (16), p.9597-9614
• Main Authors: Liu, Xinya, Alves Gouveia, Diego, Henzing, Bas, Apituley, Arnoud, Hensen, Arjan, van Dinther, Danielle, Huang, Rujin, Dusek, Ulrike
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aerosol optical properties; Aerosol properties; Aerosol scattering; Aerosols; Atmosphere; Atmospheric boundary layer; Backscatter; Backscattering; Boundary layers; Calibration; Chemical composition; Comparative analysis; Extinction; Extinction coefficient; Ground-based observation; Humidity profiles; In situ measurement; Infrastructure; Lidar; Lidar measurements; Medium-range forecasting; Meteorological data; Nitrates; Observatories; Optical properties; Optical radar; Particle size; Particle size distribution; Planetary boundary layer; Profiles; Radiation; Relative humidity; Remote sensing; Scattering coefficient; Size distribution; Trace gases; Vertical profiles; Wavelength; Weather forecasting
• ISSN: 1680-7324; 1680-7316; 1680-7324
• DOI: 10.5194/acp-24-9597-2024

In this study, we utilised ground-based in situ measurements of the aerosol chemical composition and particle size distribution, along with meteorological data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), to predict vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties, including the aerosol scattering coefficient, backscatter coefficient, extinction coefficient, and lidar ratio. The predicted ambient profiles were compared to retrievals by a multi-wavelength Raman lidar during the Ruisdael Land–Atmosphere Interactions Intensive Trace-gas and Aerosol (RITA) campaign in the Netherlands in 2021 for 26 time periods of approximately 1 h each. Predicted and retrieved extensive aerosol properties (scattering, backscatter, and extinction coefficient) were comparable only approximately 35 % of the time, mostly under the condition of well-mixed boundary layers. In this case, ground-based measurements can provide a way to extend extinction profiles to lower altitudes, where they cannot be retrieved, and to verify the lidar-measured profiles. Accurate representation of hygroscopic growth is required for adjusting the dry size distribution to ambient size distribution, and the estimated relative humidity profile may have a substantial influence on the shape of the calculated profiles. On the other hand, the lidar ratio profiles predicted by ground-based data also compared reasonably well to the retrieved lidar profiles (starting at 800 m) for conditions where the predicted and retrieved backscatter profiles differed considerably. The difference in the predicted and retrieved lidar ratio is usually less than ±30 %. Our study thus shows that, for well-mixed boundary layers, a representative lidar ratio can be estimated from ground-based in situ measurements of chemical composition and dry size distribution. This approach offers a method of providing lidar ratios calculated from independent in situ measurements for simple backscatter lidars or at times when Raman lidar profiles cannot be measured (e.g. during the daytime). It only uses data that are routinely available at aerosol measurement stations and is therefore not only useful for further validating lidar measurements but also for bridging the gap between in situ measurements and lidar remote sensing.