Loading…
Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study
Spirofy™ is India's first portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based digital spirometer developed to diagnose asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we compared the performance of the Spirofy™ device with that of the Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer in measuring...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC pulmonary medicine 2024-05, Vol.24 (1), p.230-230, Article 230 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3fbec337c2ee26bd1c76bdcbad7641a6a367ca86a55f303888695654caa9ea03 |
container_end_page | 230 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 230 |
container_title | BMC pulmonary medicine |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Talwar, Deepak Balamurugan, S Modi, Mahavir Salvi, Sundeep Lopez, Meena Shah, Rushika Vaidya, Abhijit Barne, Monica Madas, Sapna Kulkarni, Nandan Sawant, Sandesh Gogtay, Jaideep |
description | Spirofy™ is India's first portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based digital spirometer developed to diagnose asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we compared the performance of the Spirofy™ device with that of the Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer in measuring the lung capacities of healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients. We also assessed the inter-device variability between two Spirofy™ devices.
In a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study, we measured the differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV
) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between the Spirofy™ and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometers. A proportion of the FEV
/FVC ratio distribution of |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12890-024-02972-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ca9e901071d9474c8533a688f7871b7e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793416951</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ca9e901071d9474c8533a688f7871b7e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A793416951</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3fbec337c2ee26bd1c76bdcbad7641a6a367ca86a55f303888695654caa9ea03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4IAscSnSpsSxEyfHavmqVKlIlLM1cZyNV4kdbGer5cwv4adx5z8wu1tKQciyPRq_98ZjvyR5TrMzSqvydaB5VWdplnOctchT_iA5plzQNOdl-fBefJQ8CWGdZVRUBXucHLFKsIwV9XHyc-nGCbwJzhLXESCT8xGaQS_IZPU8ugiqJ93gbtKgbXA-bSDoloTJeDfqqD05_bSLu-2Pb99fkRsTexJ7TTYmwuBWHqaewDD1QK7drHoE3ecaS_QGhhmisSsyzLh0s1XR4HXwrNcwxH6LYWs2pp1hCAsCIfYjEtQuti1ZXn18QyZMaBtDCsRj0o3mq24XRHkXgttgpRDndvs0edShhn52u58kn9-9vV5-SC-v3l8szy9TxYs6ph3rGq0YEyrXOi-bliqBq2qgFSWnUAIrhYKqhKLo8CGrqirroiy4Aqg1ZOwkuTjotg7WcvJmBL-VDozcJ5xfSfDYwaClQkad0UzQtuaCK_wgBmVVdaIStBEatU4PWpN3X2YdohxNUHoYwGo3B8mygtWC5XWJ0Jf_QNdu9hY73aE4eobz7A9qBVjf2M5FD2onKs9FzTjFXiiizv6DwtHq0ShndWcw_xchPxD2b-51d9c3zeTOr_LgV4l-lXu_So6kF7c3nptRt3eU3wZlvwD2nevS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054186440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Talwar, Deepak ; Balamurugan, S ; Modi, Mahavir ; Salvi, Sundeep ; Lopez, Meena ; Shah, Rushika ; Vaidya, Abhijit ; Barne, Monica ; Madas, Sapna ; Kulkarni, Nandan ; Sawant, Sandesh ; Gogtay, Jaideep</creator><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Deepak ; Balamurugan, S ; Modi, Mahavir ; Salvi, Sundeep ; Lopez, Meena ; Shah, Rushika ; Vaidya, Abhijit ; Barne, Monica ; Madas, Sapna ; Kulkarni, Nandan ; Sawant, Sandesh ; Gogtay, Jaideep</creatorcontrib><description>Spirofy™ is India's first portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based digital spirometer developed to diagnose asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we compared the performance of the Spirofy™ device with that of the Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer in measuring the lung capacities of healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients. We also assessed the inter-device variability between two Spirofy™ devices.
In a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study, we measured the differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV
) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between the Spirofy™ and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometers. A proportion of the FEV
/FVC ratio distribution of < 0.7 was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the Spirofy™ with Vitalograph™ Alpha Touch™ spirometers.
Ninety subjects participated in this study. The mean ± SD FVC values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 2.60 ± 1.05 L, 2.64 ± 1.04 L, and 2.67 ± 1.04 L, respectively. The mean ± SD FEV
values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 1.87 ± 0.92 (L), 1.88 ± 0.92 (L), and 1.93 ± 0.93 (L), respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the FVC and FEV
values recorded by Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, Spirofy™ 1, and Spirofy™ 2. As compared to Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, the Spirofy™ device showed good sensitivity (97%), specificity (90%), and overall accuracy (93.3%) at an FEV
/FVC ratio < 0.7. No inter-device variability was observed between the two Spirofy™ devices.
Spirofy™ is a portable and easy-to-use device and is as accurate as the standard Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer for the diagnosis of COPD and asthma.
CTRI/2021/09/036492 (Clinical Trials Registry - India).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2466</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2466</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-02972-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38730359</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Asthma ; Asthma - diagnosis ; Asthma - physiopathology ; Asthmatics ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Cross-Over Studies ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Forced Expiratory Volume ; Forced vital capacity ; Humans ; India ; Lung diseases ; Lung diseases, Obstructive ; Male ; Medical equipment ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Middle Aged ; Primary care ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis ; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology ; Respiratory diseases ; Respiratory function ; Sensors ; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 ; Spirometer ; Spirometry ; Spirometry - instrumentation ; Tactile stimuli ; Vital Capacity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024-05, Vol.24 (1), p.230-230, Article 230</ispartof><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3fbec337c2ee26bd1c76bdcbad7641a6a367ca86a55f303888695654caa9ea03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3054186440?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38730359$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balamurugan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modi, Mahavir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvi, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rushika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaidya, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barne, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madas, Sapna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Nandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawant, Sandesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gogtay, Jaideep</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study</title><title>BMC pulmonary medicine</title><addtitle>BMC Pulm Med</addtitle><description>Spirofy™ is India's first portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based digital spirometer developed to diagnose asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we compared the performance of the Spirofy™ device with that of the Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer in measuring the lung capacities of healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients. We also assessed the inter-device variability between two Spirofy™ devices.
In a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study, we measured the differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV
) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between the Spirofy™ and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometers. A proportion of the FEV
/FVC ratio distribution of < 0.7 was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the Spirofy™ with Vitalograph™ Alpha Touch™ spirometers.
Ninety subjects participated in this study. The mean ± SD FVC values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 2.60 ± 1.05 L, 2.64 ± 1.04 L, and 2.67 ± 1.04 L, respectively. The mean ± SD FEV
values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 1.87 ± 0.92 (L), 1.88 ± 0.92 (L), and 1.93 ± 0.93 (L), respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the FVC and FEV
values recorded by Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, Spirofy™ 1, and Spirofy™ 2. As compared to Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, the Spirofy™ device showed good sensitivity (97%), specificity (90%), and overall accuracy (93.3%) at an FEV
/FVC ratio < 0.7. No inter-device variability was observed between the two Spirofy™ devices.
Spirofy™ is a portable and easy-to-use device and is as accurate as the standard Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer for the diagnosis of COPD and asthma.
CTRI/2021/09/036492 (Clinical Trials Registry - India).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Asthma</subject><subject>Asthma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Asthma - physiopathology</subject><subject>Asthmatics</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forced Expiratory Volume</subject><subject>Forced vital capacity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Lung diseases, Obstructive</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory diseases</subject><subject>Respiratory function</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</subject><subject>Spirometer</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>Spirometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tactile stimuli</subject><subject>Vital Capacity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1471-2466</issn><issn>1471-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4IAscSnSpsSxEyfHavmqVKlIlLM1cZyNV4kdbGer5cwv4adx5z8wu1tKQciyPRq_98ZjvyR5TrMzSqvydaB5VWdplnOctchT_iA5plzQNOdl-fBefJQ8CWGdZVRUBXucHLFKsIwV9XHyc-nGCbwJzhLXESCT8xGaQS_IZPU8ugiqJ93gbtKgbXA-bSDoloTJeDfqqD05_bSLu-2Pb99fkRsTexJ7TTYmwuBWHqaewDD1QK7drHoE3ecaS_QGhhmisSsyzLh0s1XR4HXwrNcwxH6LYWs2pp1hCAsCIfYjEtQuti1ZXn18QyZMaBtDCsRj0o3mq24XRHkXgttgpRDndvs0edShhn52u58kn9-9vV5-SC-v3l8szy9TxYs6ph3rGq0YEyrXOi-bliqBq2qgFSWnUAIrhYKqhKLo8CGrqirroiy4Aqg1ZOwkuTjotg7WcvJmBL-VDozcJ5xfSfDYwaClQkad0UzQtuaCK_wgBmVVdaIStBEatU4PWpN3X2YdohxNUHoYwGo3B8mygtWC5XWJ0Jf_QNdu9hY73aE4eobz7A9qBVjf2M5FD2onKs9FzTjFXiiizv6DwtHq0ShndWcw_xchPxD2b-51d9c3zeTOr_LgV4l-lXu_So6kF7c3nptRt3eU3wZlvwD2nevS</recordid><startdate>20240510</startdate><enddate>20240510</enddate><creator>Talwar, Deepak</creator><creator>Balamurugan, S</creator><creator>Modi, Mahavir</creator><creator>Salvi, Sundeep</creator><creator>Lopez, Meena</creator><creator>Shah, Rushika</creator><creator>Vaidya, Abhijit</creator><creator>Barne, Monica</creator><creator>Madas, Sapna</creator><creator>Kulkarni, Nandan</creator><creator>Sawant, Sandesh</creator><creator>Gogtay, Jaideep</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240510</creationdate><title>Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study</title><author>Talwar, Deepak ; Balamurugan, S ; Modi, Mahavir ; Salvi, Sundeep ; Lopez, Meena ; Shah, Rushika ; Vaidya, Abhijit ; Barne, Monica ; Madas, Sapna ; Kulkarni, Nandan ; Sawant, Sandesh ; Gogtay, Jaideep</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3fbec337c2ee26bd1c76bdcbad7641a6a367ca86a55f303888695654caa9ea03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Asthma</topic><topic>Asthma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Asthma - physiopathology</topic><topic>Asthmatics</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forced Expiratory Volume</topic><topic>Forced vital capacity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Lung diseases, Obstructive</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory diseases</topic><topic>Respiratory function</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2</topic><topic>Spirometer</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>Spirometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tactile stimuli</topic><topic>Vital Capacity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balamurugan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Modi, Mahavir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvi, Sundeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopez, Meena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Rushika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaidya, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barne, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madas, Sapna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulkarni, Nandan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sawant, Sandesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gogtay, Jaideep</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC pulmonary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Talwar, Deepak</au><au>Balamurugan, S</au><au>Modi, Mahavir</au><au>Salvi, Sundeep</au><au>Lopez, Meena</au><au>Shah, Rushika</au><au>Vaidya, Abhijit</au><au>Barne, Monica</au><au>Madas, Sapna</au><au>Kulkarni, Nandan</au><au>Sawant, Sandesh</au><au>Gogtay, Jaideep</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study</atitle><jtitle>BMC pulmonary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Pulm Med</addtitle><date>2024-05-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>230</spage><epage>230</epage><pages>230-230</pages><artnum>230</artnum><issn>1471-2466</issn><eissn>1471-2466</eissn><abstract>Spirofy™ is India's first portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based digital spirometer developed to diagnose asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we compared the performance of the Spirofy™ device with that of the Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer in measuring the lung capacities of healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients. We also assessed the inter-device variability between two Spirofy™ devices.
In a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study, we measured the differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV
) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between the Spirofy™ and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometers. A proportion of the FEV
/FVC ratio distribution of < 0.7 was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the Spirofy™ with Vitalograph™ Alpha Touch™ spirometers.
Ninety subjects participated in this study. The mean ± SD FVC values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 2.60 ± 1.05 L, 2.64 ± 1.04 L, and 2.67 ± 1.04 L, respectively. The mean ± SD FEV
values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 1.87 ± 0.92 (L), 1.88 ± 0.92 (L), and 1.93 ± 0.93 (L), respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the FVC and FEV
values recorded by Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, Spirofy™ 1, and Spirofy™ 2. As compared to Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, the Spirofy™ device showed good sensitivity (97%), specificity (90%), and overall accuracy (93.3%) at an FEV
/FVC ratio < 0.7. No inter-device variability was observed between the two Spirofy™ devices.
Spirofy™ is a portable and easy-to-use device and is as accurate as the standard Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer for the diagnosis of COPD and asthma.
CTRI/2021/09/036492 (Clinical Trials Registry - India).</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>38730359</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12890-024-02972-4</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2466 |
ispartof | BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024-05, Vol.24 (1), p.230-230, Article 230 |
issn | 1471-2466 1471-2466 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ca9e901071d9474c8533a688f7871b7e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Adult Aged Asthma Asthma - diagnosis Asthma - physiopathology Asthmatics Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Clinical trials Comparative analysis Cross-Over Studies Diagnosis Female Forced Expiratory Volume Forced vital capacity Humans India Lung diseases Lung diseases, Obstructive Male Medical equipment Medical research Medicine, Experimental Middle Aged Primary care Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - physiopathology Respiratory diseases Respiratory function Sensors Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Spirometer Spirometry Spirometry - instrumentation Tactile stimuli Vital Capacity Young Adult |
title | Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A07%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20portable,%20pneumotach%20flow-sensor-based%20spirometer%20(Spirofy%E2%84%A2)%20with%20the%20vitalograph%20alpha%20Touch%E2%84%A2%20spirometer%20in%20evaluating%20lung%20function%20in%20healthy%20individuals,%20asthmatics,%20and%20COPD%20patients-a%20randomized,%20crossover%20study&rft.jtitle=BMC%20pulmonary%20medicine&rft.au=Talwar,%20Deepak&rft.date=2024-05-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=230&rft.epage=230&rft.pages=230-230&rft.artnum=230&rft.issn=1471-2466&rft.eissn=1471-2466&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12890-024-02972-4&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA793416951%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-f3fbec337c2ee26bd1c76bdcbad7641a6a367ca86a55f303888695654caa9ea03%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054186440&rft_id=info:pmid/38730359&rft_galeid=A793416951&rfr_iscdi=true |