Loading…

Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment

Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Behavioral sciences 2023-09, Vol.13 (9), p.767
Main Authors: Xu, Ling, Fields, Noelle L., Westmore, Megan R., Daniel, Kathryn M., Troutman, Brooke A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-88918995a8c1a3d8a7ba7aa1dd912774bdbd554317e0fb9509cdeb45a7b1dfad3
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 767
container_title Behavioral sciences
container_volume 13
creator Xu, Ling
Fields, Noelle L.
Westmore, Megan R.
Daniel, Kathryn M.
Troutman, Brooke A.
description Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/bs13090767
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_caa189913a5c4e6bac44dc0a3d92078f</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A766926436</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_caa189913a5c4e6bac44dc0a3d92078f</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A766926436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-88918995a8c1a3d8a7ba7aa1dd912774bdbd554317e0fb9509cdeb45a7b1dfad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdklFvFCEQxzdGY5vaFz8BiS_G5CossMCTuZy2XtKkxmjiG5kF9o7L7rLCXk2_vdNuo1Z4GBj-85sBpqpeM3rBuaHv28I4NVQ16ll1WqNd8Vr_eP7P-qQ6L-VAcTSU1Zy-rE64UlJQIU-ruJ6mPjqYYxpJ6giQj8HFgjvoyQYmcHG-I-tSQilDGGfSpUxueh8y-RpKgOz25AvkObo4wTgX8ivOe7JJuzHO8TaQ7TBBzPeRr6oXHfQlnD_as-r75advm8-r65ur7WZ9vXJC6HmltWHaGAnaMeBeg2pBATDvDauVEq1vvZSCMxVo1xpJjfOhFRJ1zHfg-Vm1Xbg-wcFOOQ6Q72yCaB8cKe_sQ719sA65mItxkE6EpgUswTuKaQ2-nu6Q9WFhTcd2CN7hNTL0T6BPT8a4t7t0axmVtaxrioS3j4Scfh5Dme0Qiwt9D2NIx2Jr3ZiGScoFSt_8Jz2kY8Z_WFTIE5qh6mJR7QBvEMcuYWKH04chujSGLqJ_rRqMaARvMODdEuByKiWH7k_5jNr7FrJ_W4j_Bg56uLI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869252481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment</title><source>PubMed (Medline)</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Xu, Ling ; Fields, Noelle L. ; Westmore, Megan R. ; Daniel, Kathryn M. ; Troutman, Brooke A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ling ; Fields, Noelle L. ; Westmore, Megan R. ; Daniel, Kathryn M. ; Troutman, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><description>Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-328X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-328X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/bs13090767</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37754045</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adults ; Aged ; Alzheimer's disease ; assessment ; Brief Report ; Cognitive ability ; Consent ; Decision making ; decision-making capacity ; older adults with cognitive impairment ; Older people ; Portable computers ; Researchers ; UBACC</subject><ispartof>Behavioral sciences, 2023-09, Vol.13 (9), p.767</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-88918995a8c1a3d8a7ba7aa1dd912774bdbd554317e0fb9509cdeb45a7b1dfad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0798-2126</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869252481/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869252481?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Noelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westmore, Megan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troutman, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><title>Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment</title><title>Behavioral sciences</title><description>Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Alzheimer's disease</subject><subject>assessment</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>decision-making capacity</subject><subject>older adults with cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Portable computers</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>UBACC</subject><issn>2076-328X</issn><issn>2076-328X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpdklFvFCEQxzdGY5vaFz8BiS_G5CossMCTuZy2XtKkxmjiG5kF9o7L7rLCXk2_vdNuo1Z4GBj-85sBpqpeM3rBuaHv28I4NVQ16ll1WqNd8Vr_eP7P-qQ6L-VAcTSU1Zy-rE64UlJQIU-ruJ6mPjqYYxpJ6giQj8HFgjvoyQYmcHG-I-tSQilDGGfSpUxueh8y-RpKgOz25AvkObo4wTgX8ivOe7JJuzHO8TaQ7TBBzPeRr6oXHfQlnD_as-r75advm8-r65ur7WZ9vXJC6HmltWHaGAnaMeBeg2pBATDvDauVEq1vvZSCMxVo1xpJjfOhFRJ1zHfg-Vm1Xbg-wcFOOQ6Q72yCaB8cKe_sQ719sA65mItxkE6EpgUswTuKaQ2-nu6Q9WFhTcd2CN7hNTL0T6BPT8a4t7t0axmVtaxrioS3j4Scfh5Dme0Qiwt9D2NIx2Jr3ZiGScoFSt_8Jz2kY8Z_WFTIE5qh6mJR7QBvEMcuYWKH04chujSGLqJ_rRqMaARvMODdEuByKiWH7k_5jNr7FrJ_W4j_Bg56uLI</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Xu, Ling</creator><creator>Fields, Noelle L.</creator><creator>Westmore, Megan R.</creator><creator>Daniel, Kathryn M.</creator><creator>Troutman, Brooke A.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-2126</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment</title><author>Xu, Ling ; Fields, Noelle L. ; Westmore, Megan R. ; Daniel, Kathryn M. ; Troutman, Brooke A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-88918995a8c1a3d8a7ba7aa1dd912774bdbd554317e0fb9509cdeb45a7b1dfad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Alzheimer's disease</topic><topic>assessment</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>decision-making capacity</topic><topic>older adults with cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Portable computers</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>UBACC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xu, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fields, Noelle L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Westmore, Megan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniel, Kathryn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troutman, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Behavioral sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xu, Ling</au><au>Fields, Noelle L.</au><au>Westmore, Megan R.</au><au>Daniel, Kathryn M.</au><au>Troutman, Brooke A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral sciences</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>767</spage><pages>767-</pages><issn>2076-328X</issn><eissn>2076-328X</eissn><abstract>Decisional capacity assessment is important for older adult participants who have cognitive impairment. This paper reports the implementation of the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) and its potential for practice and research. Nine of the 10 items remained to use except for adapting the last item. Approximately 130 older adults with cognitive impairment completed the UBACC screening. Item-by-item descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis (EFA), group comparisons of each item, as well as total sum scores of the UBACC were conducted. Results showed that the items that were most often answered correctly included item #10 (participant will be paid), item #4 (study is voluntary), and item #5 (can withdraw at any time). Conversely, the items that were most often answered incorrectly included item #9 (not any benefit potentially), item #7 (potential risk or discomfort), and item #6 (tasks during participation). Respondents with mild cognitive impairment had higher correct answer rates than those with advanced cognitive impairment. The UBACC screening tool has relative utility for older participants with cognitive impairment.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>37754045</pmid><doi>10.3390/bs13090767</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0798-2126</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-328X
ispartof Behavioral sciences, 2023-09, Vol.13 (9), p.767
issn 2076-328X
2076-328X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_caa189913a5c4e6bac44dc0a3d92078f
source PubMed (Medline); Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Adults
Aged
Alzheimer's disease
assessment
Brief Report
Cognitive ability
Consent
Decision making
decision-making capacity
older adults with cognitive impairment
Older people
Portable computers
Researchers
UBACC
title Application of a Decisional Capacity Assessment for Older Research Participants with Cognitive Impairment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A38%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20a%20Decisional%20Capacity%20Assessment%20for%20Older%20Research%20Participants%20with%20Cognitive%20Impairment&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20sciences&rft.au=Xu,%20Ling&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=767&rft.pages=767-&rft.issn=2076-328X&rft.eissn=2076-328X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/bs13090767&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA766926436%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-88918995a8c1a3d8a7ba7aa1dd912774bdbd554317e0fb9509cdeb45a7b1dfad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869252481&rft_id=info:pmid/37754045&rft_galeid=A766926436&rfr_iscdi=true