Loading…

Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation

IntroductionThe stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. MethodsA global meta-analysis was performed using 884...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in microbiology 2023-04, Vol.14, p.1175854-1175854
Main Authors: Zou, Junliang, Zhang, Weiwei, Zhang, Yun, Wu, Juying
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363
container_end_page 1175854
container_issue
container_start_page 1175854
container_title Frontiers in microbiology
container_volume 14
creator Zou, Junliang
Zhang, Weiwei
Zhang, Yun
Wu, Juying
description IntroductionThe stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. MethodsA global meta-analysis was performed using 884 lines of observations collected from published papers, which analyzed the eCO2 impact on plant and microbial biomass. ResultsA significant positive impact of eCO2 was observed on various biomass measures, including aboveground biomass (20.5%), belowground biomass (42.6%), soil microbial biomass (10.4%), fungal biomass (11.0%), and bacterial biomass (9.2%). It was found that eCO2 levels above 200 ppm had a greater impact on plant biomass compared to concentrations at or below 200 ppm. On the other hand, studies showed that positive effects on microbial biomass were more prominent at lower eCO2 levels (≤200 ppm) than at higher levels (>200 ppm), which could be explained by soil nitrogen limitations. Importantly, our results indicated that aboveground biomass was controlled more by climatic and experimental conditions, while soil properties strongly impacted the stimulation of belowground and microbial biomass. DiscussionOur results provided evidence of the eCO2 fertilization effect across various ecosystem types, experimental methods, and climates, and provided a quantitative estimate of plant and soil microbial biomass sensitivity to eCO2. The results obtained in this study suggest that ecosystem models should consider climatic and edaphic factors to more accurately predict the effects of global climate change and their impact on ecosystem functions.
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cac2ad6919454a8587a18eb39162ee8b</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cac2ad6919454a8587a18eb39162ee8b</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2811217016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUGLHCEQhSUkkGWyfyAnj7nMRC3b1lMIQ7K7MLCXBHKT0taJS3fb0Z5A_n2cnSFk62CJJV893iPkPWc7AG0-xil5txNMwI7zvtOdfEVuuFJyC0z8eP3f_S25rfWJtZJMtPOGHO7G7HCkC65rKHOlOdJlxHmlOA-0gUt2qc1dyhPWStNMS6hLnmuga6b7R0HjaUpHXFOe35E3Eccabq99Q75__fJtf789PN497D8ftl5KtW57NzAtDURhOBMqeqkgaG1QBc64BOb10EME4A5Y36sIBk3HEZzuNYCCDXm4cIeMT3YpacLyx2ZM9vkhl6PFsiY_BuvRCxyU4UZ2EnWne-Q6ODBciRC0a6xPF9ZyclMYfJjXguML6MvJnH7aY_5tm9ROmaZnQz5cCSX_OoW62ilVH8bmYsinaoXmXPCe8bNwcfnabK21hPhvD2f2nKV9ztKes7TXLOEvVbmSLg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811217016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zou, Junliang ; Zhang, Weiwei ; Zhang, Yun ; Wu, Juying</creator><creatorcontrib>Zou, Junliang ; Zhang, Weiwei ; Zhang, Yun ; Wu, Juying</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionThe stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. MethodsA global meta-analysis was performed using 884 lines of observations collected from published papers, which analyzed the eCO2 impact on plant and microbial biomass. ResultsA significant positive impact of eCO2 was observed on various biomass measures, including aboveground biomass (20.5%), belowground biomass (42.6%), soil microbial biomass (10.4%), fungal biomass (11.0%), and bacterial biomass (9.2%). It was found that eCO2 levels above 200 ppm had a greater impact on plant biomass compared to concentrations at or below 200 ppm. On the other hand, studies showed that positive effects on microbial biomass were more prominent at lower eCO2 levels (≤200 ppm) than at higher levels (&gt;200 ppm), which could be explained by soil nitrogen limitations. Importantly, our results indicated that aboveground biomass was controlled more by climatic and experimental conditions, while soil properties strongly impacted the stimulation of belowground and microbial biomass. DiscussionOur results provided evidence of the eCO2 fertilization effect across various ecosystem types, experimental methods, and climates, and provided a quantitative estimate of plant and soil microbial biomass sensitivity to eCO2. The results obtained in this study suggest that ecosystem models should consider climatic and edaphic factors to more accurately predict the effects of global climate change and their impact on ecosystem functions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-302X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers Media S.A</publisher><subject>bacterial biomass ; fungal biomass ; meta-analysis ; Microbiology ; plant biomass ; rising CO2 level ; soil microbial biomass</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in microbiology, 2023-04, Vol.14, p.1175854-1175854</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Zou, Zhang, Zhang and Wu. 2023 Zou, Zhang, Zhang and Wu</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156983/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156983/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zou, Junliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Juying</creatorcontrib><title>Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation</title><title>Frontiers in microbiology</title><description>IntroductionThe stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. MethodsA global meta-analysis was performed using 884 lines of observations collected from published papers, which analyzed the eCO2 impact on plant and microbial biomass. ResultsA significant positive impact of eCO2 was observed on various biomass measures, including aboveground biomass (20.5%), belowground biomass (42.6%), soil microbial biomass (10.4%), fungal biomass (11.0%), and bacterial biomass (9.2%). It was found that eCO2 levels above 200 ppm had a greater impact on plant biomass compared to concentrations at or below 200 ppm. On the other hand, studies showed that positive effects on microbial biomass were more prominent at lower eCO2 levels (≤200 ppm) than at higher levels (&gt;200 ppm), which could be explained by soil nitrogen limitations. Importantly, our results indicated that aboveground biomass was controlled more by climatic and experimental conditions, while soil properties strongly impacted the stimulation of belowground and microbial biomass. DiscussionOur results provided evidence of the eCO2 fertilization effect across various ecosystem types, experimental methods, and climates, and provided a quantitative estimate of plant and soil microbial biomass sensitivity to eCO2. The results obtained in this study suggest that ecosystem models should consider climatic and edaphic factors to more accurately predict the effects of global climate change and their impact on ecosystem functions.</description><subject>bacterial biomass</subject><subject>fungal biomass</subject><subject>meta-analysis</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>plant biomass</subject><subject>rising CO2 level</subject><subject>soil microbial biomass</subject><issn>1664-302X</issn><issn>1664-302X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUGLHCEQhSUkkGWyfyAnj7nMRC3b1lMIQ7K7MLCXBHKT0taJS3fb0Z5A_n2cnSFk62CJJV893iPkPWc7AG0-xil5txNMwI7zvtOdfEVuuFJyC0z8eP3f_S25rfWJtZJMtPOGHO7G7HCkC65rKHOlOdJlxHmlOA-0gUt2qc1dyhPWStNMS6hLnmuga6b7R0HjaUpHXFOe35E3Eccabq99Q75__fJtf789PN497D8ftl5KtW57NzAtDURhOBMqeqkgaG1QBc64BOb10EME4A5Y36sIBk3HEZzuNYCCDXm4cIeMT3YpacLyx2ZM9vkhl6PFsiY_BuvRCxyU4UZ2EnWne-Q6ODBciRC0a6xPF9ZyclMYfJjXguML6MvJnH7aY_5tm9ROmaZnQz5cCSX_OoW62ilVH8bmYsinaoXmXPCe8bNwcfnabK21hPhvD2f2nKV9ztKes7TXLOEvVbmSLg</recordid><startdate>20230420</startdate><enddate>20230420</enddate><creator>Zou, Junliang</creator><creator>Zhang, Weiwei</creator><creator>Zhang, Yun</creator><creator>Wu, Juying</creator><general>Frontiers Media S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230420</creationdate><title>Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation</title><author>Zou, Junliang ; Zhang, Weiwei ; Zhang, Yun ; Wu, Juying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>bacterial biomass</topic><topic>fungal biomass</topic><topic>meta-analysis</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>plant biomass</topic><topic>rising CO2 level</topic><topic>soil microbial biomass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zou, Junliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Juying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zou, Junliang</au><au>Zhang, Weiwei</au><au>Zhang, Yun</au><au>Wu, Juying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in microbiology</jtitle><date>2023-04-20</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>14</volume><spage>1175854</spage><epage>1175854</epage><pages>1175854-1175854</pages><issn>1664-302X</issn><eissn>1664-302X</eissn><abstract>IntroductionThe stimulation of plant and microbial growth has been widely observed as a result of elevated CO2 concentrations (eCO2), however, this stimulation could be influenced by various factors and their relative importance remains unclear. MethodsA global meta-analysis was performed using 884 lines of observations collected from published papers, which analyzed the eCO2 impact on plant and microbial biomass. ResultsA significant positive impact of eCO2 was observed on various biomass measures, including aboveground biomass (20.5%), belowground biomass (42.6%), soil microbial biomass (10.4%), fungal biomass (11.0%), and bacterial biomass (9.2%). It was found that eCO2 levels above 200 ppm had a greater impact on plant biomass compared to concentrations at or below 200 ppm. On the other hand, studies showed that positive effects on microbial biomass were more prominent at lower eCO2 levels (≤200 ppm) than at higher levels (&gt;200 ppm), which could be explained by soil nitrogen limitations. Importantly, our results indicated that aboveground biomass was controlled more by climatic and experimental conditions, while soil properties strongly impacted the stimulation of belowground and microbial biomass. DiscussionOur results provided evidence of the eCO2 fertilization effect across various ecosystem types, experimental methods, and climates, and provided a quantitative estimate of plant and soil microbial biomass sensitivity to eCO2. The results obtained in this study suggest that ecosystem models should consider climatic and edaphic factors to more accurately predict the effects of global climate change and their impact on ecosystem functions.</abstract><pub>Frontiers Media S.A</pub><doi>10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-302X
ispartof Frontiers in microbiology, 2023-04, Vol.14, p.1175854-1175854
issn 1664-302X
1664-302X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cac2ad6919454a8587a18eb39162ee8b
source PubMed Central
subjects bacterial biomass
fungal biomass
meta-analysis
Microbiology
plant biomass
rising CO2 level
soil microbial biomass
title Global patterns of plant and microbial biomass in response to CO2 fumigation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A53%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20patterns%20of%20plant%20and%20microbial%20biomass%20in%20response%20to%20CO2%20fumigation&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20microbiology&rft.au=Zou,%20Junliang&rft.date=2023-04-20&rft.volume=14&rft.spage=1175854&rft.epage=1175854&rft.pages=1175854-1175854&rft.issn=1664-302X&rft.eissn=1664-302X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1175854&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2811217016%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7bd08493f291026fc463e889a6e101430c8d73f331b30776f39a951a3b8783363%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811217016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true