Loading…

Left atrial appendage function assessment and thrombus identification

The diagnosis of thrombus in the left atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and may be inconsistent because of variability in thrombus morphology. In some cases it is challenging and requires unusual approach. New Doppler-derived methods might be helpful to identify such thromb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature 2017-03, Vol.14 (C), p.33-40
Main Authors: Kurzawski, Jacek, Janion-Sadowska, Agnieszka, Sadowski, Marcin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The diagnosis of thrombus in the left atrium in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and may be inconsistent because of variability in thrombus morphology. In some cases it is challenging and requires unusual approach. New Doppler-derived methods might be helpful to identify such thrombi. We evaluated quantitative differences in mechanical function of the left atrial appendage (LAA) basal segments using tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) in patients with non-valvular AF with and without LAA thrombus and compared them with SR patients. A total of 80 patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction underwent transesophageal echocardiography (40 patients with SR and 40 patients with AF on oral anticoagulants including patients with LAA thrombus). We analyzed the basal segments of LAA including left lateral ridge (LLR) and baso-medial appendage segment (BMAS). Quantitative analysis was used to calculate peak velocity, average velocity, strain, strain rate and deformation. In patients with AF the lower LLR strain rate was the sole new STE significant parameter differentiating patients with and without LAA thrombi: −0.9(−1.2; −0.1)s−1 vs. −1.6(−1.9; −1.3)s−1, (p=0.004). Additionally, patients in SR demonstrated significantly better peak velocity, average velocity, strain, strain rate and deformation than those with AF (p
ISSN:2352-9067
2352-9067
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.11.003