Loading…

Is a pedicular flap coupled to the double turnover flaps urethroplasty suitable for urethral–perineal reconstruction? Considerations about a relapsing urethral–cutaneous fistula condition

Background: This study highlights the effectiveness, in one surgical stage, of two combined local techniques for perineal fistula repair in a patient with spinal cord injury: the " Turn over flaps urethroplasty" and the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap" from the inferior gluteal f...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:JPRAS open 2023-12, Vol.38, p.91-97
Main Authors: Borgognone, Alessandro, Santi, Giancarlo Delli, Baffigo, Giulio, Capobianco, Serena Vincenza, Goletti, Stefania
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-586f43e82f23ee829921baed66a590b329189ec3b15a60a4e1e21a7cd53a041e3
container_end_page 97
container_issue
container_start_page 91
container_title JPRAS open
container_volume 38
creator Borgognone, Alessandro
Santi, Giancarlo Delli
Baffigo, Giulio
Capobianco, Serena Vincenza
Goletti, Stefania
description Background: This study highlights the effectiveness, in one surgical stage, of two combined local techniques for perineal fistula repair in a patient with spinal cord injury: the " Turn over flaps urethroplasty" and the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap" from the inferior gluteal fold. Unlike the traditional Perforator flap, we harvested a Pedicular flap; by definition, this is a flap with a narrow diffuse microvascular supply aimed in our case at shielding the neourethra and substituting the remaining scarred perineum. Method: The urethroplasty technique adopted, the ‘Double turn over flaps urethroplasty’, has been based on sculpting two opposing local cutaneous flaps circumscribing the fistulous cutaneous openings. Eventually, the neourethra continuity has been re-established by turning over both flaps and making them meet medially. The dimension and thickness of the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap", have been considered to prevent any damage to the urethroplasty and at the same time to replace all the debrided scarred perineal tissue. Results: The follow-up confirmed a well-consolidated supple perineal area and a competent neourethra. Conclusions: The "Pedicular flap" is by definition a random vascular flap nourished through a narrow pedicle, not based on a single perforator but only on a diffuse, spread micro-perforators. When associated with the double "Turn over flaps urethroplasty", it represents a possible alternative to achieve satisfactory results for those physical and psychological challenges encountered in the treatment of recurrent urethral fistula of the perineum in a patient with spinal cord injury.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cb390b518c114f158db013bc10db9389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S235258782300044X</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cb390b518c114f158db013bc10db9389</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2868670944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-586f43e82f23ee829921baed66a590b329189ec3b15a60a4e1e21a7cd53a041e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kkuK3DAQhk1IIMPMXCArLbNpRw_LLUNgCE0eDQOzSdZClsrdMmrL0aNhdrlDDpS75CSR4ybMbLIqlarqU1Xpr6o3BNcEk_bdWI9zUDXFlNVY1BjTF9UVZZxuuNiKl0_Or6vbGEeMMeEtxU13Vf3aR6TQDMbq7FRAg1Mz0j7PDgxKHqUjIONz7wClHCZ_hjUnohwgHYOfnYrpEcVsk1qyBh8uIeV-__g5Q7ATKIcCaD_FFLJO1k93aFc8ayCoxS099D6n0kmABW6nw1OIzklN4HNEg42p9Fk6nIxdKm-qV4NyEW4v9rr69unj192Xzf3D5_3uw_1GNxynMnw7NAwEHSiDYrqOkl6BaVvFO9wz2hHRgWY94arFqgEClKitNpwp3BBg19V-5RqvRjkHe1LhUXpl5d8LHw5ShWS1A6l7VpCcCE1IMxAuTI8J6zXBpu-Y6ArrbmXNuT-B0TClMucz6PPIZI_y4M-SYE4aJnghvL0Qgv-eISZ5slGDc-uaJBWtaLe4a5qSStdUHXyMAYZ_7xAsF_nIUS7ykYt8JBayyKcUvV-LoKz0bCHIqC1Musik_GMqM9v_lf8BkjbXfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2868670944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is a pedicular flap coupled to the double turnover flaps urethroplasty suitable for urethral–perineal reconstruction? Considerations about a relapsing urethral–cutaneous fistula condition</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Borgognone, Alessandro ; Santi, Giancarlo Delli ; Baffigo, Giulio ; Capobianco, Serena Vincenza ; Goletti, Stefania</creator><creatorcontrib>Borgognone, Alessandro ; Santi, Giancarlo Delli ; Baffigo, Giulio ; Capobianco, Serena Vincenza ; Goletti, Stefania</creatorcontrib><description>Background: This study highlights the effectiveness, in one surgical stage, of two combined local techniques for perineal fistula repair in a patient with spinal cord injury: the " Turn over flaps urethroplasty" and the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap" from the inferior gluteal fold. Unlike the traditional Perforator flap, we harvested a Pedicular flap; by definition, this is a flap with a narrow diffuse microvascular supply aimed in our case at shielding the neourethra and substituting the remaining scarred perineum. Method: The urethroplasty technique adopted, the ‘Double turn over flaps urethroplasty’, has been based on sculpting two opposing local cutaneous flaps circumscribing the fistulous cutaneous openings. Eventually, the neourethra continuity has been re-established by turning over both flaps and making them meet medially. The dimension and thickness of the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap", have been considered to prevent any damage to the urethroplasty and at the same time to replace all the debrided scarred perineal tissue. Results: The follow-up confirmed a well-consolidated supple perineal area and a competent neourethra. Conclusions: The "Pedicular flap" is by definition a random vascular flap nourished through a narrow pedicle, not based on a single perforator but only on a diffuse, spread micro-perforators. When associated with the double "Turn over flaps urethroplasty", it represents a possible alternative to achieve satisfactory results for those physical and psychological challenges encountered in the treatment of recurrent urethral fistula of the perineum in a patient with spinal cord injury.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2352-5878</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-5878</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cutaneous bulbar urethral fistula ; Double turnover flaps urethroplasty ; Gluteal inferior fasciocutaneous flap ; Local skin flaps for bulbar urethroplasty ; Original ; Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap ; Perineal reconstruction in patient with spinal cord injury ; Perineum reconstruction ; Urethral–cutaneous fistula</subject><ispartof>JPRAS open, 2023-12, Vol.38, p.91-97</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-586f43e82f23ee829921baed66a590b329189ec3b15a60a4e1e21a7cd53a041e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8686-9994</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514385/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235258782300044X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,3536,27901,27902,45756,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borgognone, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Giancarlo Delli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baffigo, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capobianco, Serena Vincenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goletti, Stefania</creatorcontrib><title>Is a pedicular flap coupled to the double turnover flaps urethroplasty suitable for urethral–perineal reconstruction? Considerations about a relapsing urethral–cutaneous fistula condition</title><title>JPRAS open</title><description>Background: This study highlights the effectiveness, in one surgical stage, of two combined local techniques for perineal fistula repair in a patient with spinal cord injury: the " Turn over flaps urethroplasty" and the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap" from the inferior gluteal fold. Unlike the traditional Perforator flap, we harvested a Pedicular flap; by definition, this is a flap with a narrow diffuse microvascular supply aimed in our case at shielding the neourethra and substituting the remaining scarred perineum. Method: The urethroplasty technique adopted, the ‘Double turn over flaps urethroplasty’, has been based on sculpting two opposing local cutaneous flaps circumscribing the fistulous cutaneous openings. Eventually, the neourethra continuity has been re-established by turning over both flaps and making them meet medially. The dimension and thickness of the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap", have been considered to prevent any damage to the urethroplasty and at the same time to replace all the debrided scarred perineal tissue. Results: The follow-up confirmed a well-consolidated supple perineal area and a competent neourethra. Conclusions: The "Pedicular flap" is by definition a random vascular flap nourished through a narrow pedicle, not based on a single perforator but only on a diffuse, spread micro-perforators. When associated with the double "Turn over flaps urethroplasty", it represents a possible alternative to achieve satisfactory results for those physical and psychological challenges encountered in the treatment of recurrent urethral fistula of the perineum in a patient with spinal cord injury.</description><subject>Cutaneous bulbar urethral fistula</subject><subject>Double turnover flaps urethroplasty</subject><subject>Gluteal inferior fasciocutaneous flap</subject><subject>Local skin flaps for bulbar urethroplasty</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap</subject><subject>Perineal reconstruction in patient with spinal cord injury</subject><subject>Perineum reconstruction</subject><subject>Urethral–cutaneous fistula</subject><issn>2352-5878</issn><issn>2352-5878</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kkuK3DAQhk1IIMPMXCArLbNpRw_LLUNgCE0eDQOzSdZClsrdMmrL0aNhdrlDDpS75CSR4ybMbLIqlarqU1Xpr6o3BNcEk_bdWI9zUDXFlNVY1BjTF9UVZZxuuNiKl0_Or6vbGEeMMeEtxU13Vf3aR6TQDMbq7FRAg1Mz0j7PDgxKHqUjIONz7wClHCZ_hjUnohwgHYOfnYrpEcVsk1qyBh8uIeV-__g5Q7ATKIcCaD_FFLJO1k93aFc8ayCoxS099D6n0kmABW6nw1OIzklN4HNEg42p9Fk6nIxdKm-qV4NyEW4v9rr69unj192Xzf3D5_3uw_1GNxynMnw7NAwEHSiDYrqOkl6BaVvFO9wz2hHRgWY94arFqgEClKitNpwp3BBg19V-5RqvRjkHe1LhUXpl5d8LHw5ShWS1A6l7VpCcCE1IMxAuTI8J6zXBpu-Y6ArrbmXNuT-B0TClMucz6PPIZI_y4M-SYE4aJnghvL0Qgv-eISZ5slGDc-uaJBWtaLe4a5qSStdUHXyMAYZ_7xAsF_nIUS7ykYt8JBayyKcUvV-LoKz0bCHIqC1Musik_GMqM9v_lf8BkjbXfw</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Borgognone, Alessandro</creator><creator>Santi, Giancarlo Delli</creator><creator>Baffigo, Giulio</creator><creator>Capobianco, Serena Vincenza</creator><creator>Goletti, Stefania</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-9994</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Is a pedicular flap coupled to the double turnover flaps urethroplasty suitable for urethral–perineal reconstruction? Considerations about a relapsing urethral–cutaneous fistula condition</title><author>Borgognone, Alessandro ; Santi, Giancarlo Delli ; Baffigo, Giulio ; Capobianco, Serena Vincenza ; Goletti, Stefania</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-586f43e82f23ee829921baed66a590b329189ec3b15a60a4e1e21a7cd53a041e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cutaneous bulbar urethral fistula</topic><topic>Double turnover flaps urethroplasty</topic><topic>Gluteal inferior fasciocutaneous flap</topic><topic>Local skin flaps for bulbar urethroplasty</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap</topic><topic>Perineal reconstruction in patient with spinal cord injury</topic><topic>Perineum reconstruction</topic><topic>Urethral–cutaneous fistula</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borgognone, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santi, Giancarlo Delli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baffigo, Giulio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Capobianco, Serena Vincenza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goletti, Stefania</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>JPRAS open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borgognone, Alessandro</au><au>Santi, Giancarlo Delli</au><au>Baffigo, Giulio</au><au>Capobianco, Serena Vincenza</au><au>Goletti, Stefania</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is a pedicular flap coupled to the double turnover flaps urethroplasty suitable for urethral–perineal reconstruction? Considerations about a relapsing urethral–cutaneous fistula condition</atitle><jtitle>JPRAS open</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>91</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>91-97</pages><issn>2352-5878</issn><eissn>2352-5878</eissn><abstract>Background: This study highlights the effectiveness, in one surgical stage, of two combined local techniques for perineal fistula repair in a patient with spinal cord injury: the " Turn over flaps urethroplasty" and the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap" from the inferior gluteal fold. Unlike the traditional Perforator flap, we harvested a Pedicular flap; by definition, this is a flap with a narrow diffuse microvascular supply aimed in our case at shielding the neourethra and substituting the remaining scarred perineum. Method: The urethroplasty technique adopted, the ‘Double turn over flaps urethroplasty’, has been based on sculpting two opposing local cutaneous flaps circumscribing the fistulous cutaneous openings. Eventually, the neourethra continuity has been re-established by turning over both flaps and making them meet medially. The dimension and thickness of the "Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap", have been considered to prevent any damage to the urethroplasty and at the same time to replace all the debrided scarred perineal tissue. Results: The follow-up confirmed a well-consolidated supple perineal area and a competent neourethra. Conclusions: The "Pedicular flap" is by definition a random vascular flap nourished through a narrow pedicle, not based on a single perforator but only on a diffuse, spread micro-perforators. When associated with the double "Turn over flaps urethroplasty", it represents a possible alternative to achieve satisfactory results for those physical and psychological challenges encountered in the treatment of recurrent urethral fistula of the perineum in a patient with spinal cord injury.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.002</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-9994</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2352-5878
ispartof JPRAS open, 2023-12, Vol.38, p.91-97
issn 2352-5878
2352-5878
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cb390b518c114f158db013bc10db9389
source ScienceDirect Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cutaneous bulbar urethral fistula
Double turnover flaps urethroplasty
Gluteal inferior fasciocutaneous flap
Local skin flaps for bulbar urethroplasty
Original
Pedicular fasciocutaneous flap
Perineal reconstruction in patient with spinal cord injury
Perineum reconstruction
Urethral–cutaneous fistula
title Is a pedicular flap coupled to the double turnover flaps urethroplasty suitable for urethral–perineal reconstruction? Considerations about a relapsing urethral–cutaneous fistula condition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A54%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20a%20pedicular%20flap%20coupled%20to%20the%20double%20turnover%20flaps%20urethroplasty%20suitable%20for%20urethral%E2%80%93perineal%20reconstruction?%20Considerations%20about%20a%20relapsing%20urethral%E2%80%93cutaneous%20fistula%20condition&rft.jtitle=JPRAS%20open&rft.au=Borgognone,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=91-97&rft.issn=2352-5878&rft.eissn=2352-5878&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jpra.2023.08.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2868670944%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c450t-586f43e82f23ee829921baed66a590b329189ec3b15a60a4e1e21a7cd53a041e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2868670944&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true