Loading…
Are clinical trials randomising households to lifestyle interventions to delay cognitive decline feasible? A pilot study to determine the beliefs, preferences, and deterrents for households impacted by dementia based on semi-structured interviews
While lifestyle risk factors are implicated in the development and progression of cognitive impairment, interventional trials of individual participants have yielded unconvincing evidence. We sought to explore the development of lifestyle interventions targeting the household-unit. Semi-structured i...
Saved in:
Published in: | BMC geriatrics 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.322-322, Article 322 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-6881af97aa935342d520f7e3c23fa2dafcbdfe0a38c5be09e6aef282ab268e853 |
container_end_page | 322 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 322 |
container_title | BMC geriatrics |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Costello, Maria M Mc Carthy, Christine E Bosch, Jackie Robinson, Stephanie McDermott, Clodagh Canavan, Michelle D O'Donnell, Martin J |
description | While lifestyle risk factors are implicated in the development and progression of cognitive impairment, interventional trials of individual participants have yielded unconvincing evidence. We sought to explore the development of lifestyle interventions targeting the household-unit.
Semi-structured interviews were carried out among eight households affected by cognitive impairment (i.e. member of the household had cognitive impairment). Interviews took place online using a secure, web-based video platform recommended for patient clinician interaction. Interview content was analysed, and important themes identified.
Eighteen participants were interviewed within households, of which eight (one per household) had cognitive impairment and others were spouses or first-degree relatives living in the same home. Several themes emerged; 1) household members without cognitive impairment were more likely to report poor sleep habits, and sleep was perceived to be the hardest behaviour to change; 2) diet generated most interest as a potential lifestyle intervention target as most participants believed there is a strong link with nutrition and cognition; 3) physical activity is challenging to adapt due to lack of motivation and focus when individuals are cognitively impaired. Barriers to study participation, including risk of harm, complexity of intervention and deviation from routine emerged during discussions.
This study identified beliefs and preferences of households towards lifestyle intervention trials. Findings from this study may be used to inform future clinical trial protocols and future qualitative studies should explore acceptability and feasibility of digital intervention applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12877-022-02941-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cb67857b0ce047a78044105f77dbd4db</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A700420661</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cb67857b0ce047a78044105f77dbd4db</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A700420661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-6881af97aa935342d520f7e3c23fa2dafcbdfe0a38c5be09e6aef282ab268e853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUk1vFSEUnRiNrdU_4MKQuHHhVGA-YDaal8aPJk3c6JowcHmPhoEnMM-8P-5aplNrawyZAJdzz5x776mqlwSfE8L7d4lQzliNKS3f0JKaP6pOSctITRvCH987n1TPUrrGmDBO-6fVSdO1hGPSnFa_NhGQctZbJR3K0UqXUJReh8km67doF-YEu-B0QjkgZw2kfHSArM8QD-CzDf7mSYOTR6TC1ttsD1DuCy0gAzLZ0cEHtEF760JGKc_6uKYUjmkB5R2gEZwFk96ifQQDEbyCcilSVlwJ5IRMiPcl2WkvVQaNxmNBTYsciUaZSiR4lGCydcpxVnmOJbRqtvAzPa-emFIpvLjdz6rvnz5-u_hSX339fHmxuapVR9pc95wTaQYm5dB0TUt1R7Fh0CjaGEm1NGrUBrBsuOpGwAP0EgzlVI6058C75qy6XHl1kNdiH-0k41EEacVNIMStkDFb5UCosWe8YyNWgFsmGcdtS3BnGNOjbvVYuN6vXPt5nECrUmyU7gHpwxdvd2IbDmLAuBswLwRvbgli-DGXOYoyYwXOSQ-lpYL2HaYdLdIL9PU_0OswR19ataAoJsPQkb-orSwFWG9C-a9aSMWGYdxS3PcL6vw_qLLKwKwKHowt8QcJdE1QMaRUzHBXI8Ficb5YnS-K88WN88Wi-NX97tyl_LF68xuzBwYa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2652019951</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are clinical trials randomising households to lifestyle interventions to delay cognitive decline feasible? A pilot study to determine the beliefs, preferences, and deterrents for households impacted by dementia based on semi-structured interviews</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><source>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</source><creator>Costello, Maria M ; Mc Carthy, Christine E ; Bosch, Jackie ; Robinson, Stephanie ; McDermott, Clodagh ; Canavan, Michelle D ; O'Donnell, Martin J</creator><creatorcontrib>Costello, Maria M ; Mc Carthy, Christine E ; Bosch, Jackie ; Robinson, Stephanie ; McDermott, Clodagh ; Canavan, Michelle D ; O'Donnell, Martin J</creatorcontrib><description>While lifestyle risk factors are implicated in the development and progression of cognitive impairment, interventional trials of individual participants have yielded unconvincing evidence. We sought to explore the development of lifestyle interventions targeting the household-unit.
Semi-structured interviews were carried out among eight households affected by cognitive impairment (i.e. member of the household had cognitive impairment). Interviews took place online using a secure, web-based video platform recommended for patient clinician interaction. Interview content was analysed, and important themes identified.
Eighteen participants were interviewed within households, of which eight (one per household) had cognitive impairment and others were spouses or first-degree relatives living in the same home. Several themes emerged; 1) household members without cognitive impairment were more likely to report poor sleep habits, and sleep was perceived to be the hardest behaviour to change; 2) diet generated most interest as a potential lifestyle intervention target as most participants believed there is a strong link with nutrition and cognition; 3) physical activity is challenging to adapt due to lack of motivation and focus when individuals are cognitively impaired. Barriers to study participation, including risk of harm, complexity of intervention and deviation from routine emerged during discussions.
This study identified beliefs and preferences of households towards lifestyle intervention trials. Findings from this study may be used to inform future clinical trial protocols and future qualitative studies should explore acceptability and feasibility of digital intervention applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2318</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-02941-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35418013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Behavior modification ; Behavioural change ; Brain research ; Caregivers ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cognition disorders ; Cognitive ability ; Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology ; Cognitive Dysfunction - prevention & control ; Complications and side effects ; Consent ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Dementia ; Dementia - epidemiology ; Dementia - prevention & control ; Dementia disorders ; Diet ; Exercise ; Geriatrics ; Health aspects ; Households ; Humans ; Intervention ; Interviews ; Life Style ; Lifestyle interventions ; Lifestyles ; Memory ; Motivation ; Older people ; Pandemics ; Patient outcomes ; Physical activity ; Pilot Projects ; Psychological aspects ; Qualitative ; Qualitative research ; Risk factors ; Sleep ; Social aspects</subject><ispartof>BMC geriatrics, 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.322-322, Article 322</ispartof><rights>2022. The Author(s).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-6881af97aa935342d520f7e3c23fa2dafcbdfe0a38c5be09e6aef282ab268e853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9005908/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2652019951?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35418013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Costello, Maria M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mc Carthy, Christine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Clodagh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canavan, Michelle D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Martin J</creatorcontrib><title>Are clinical trials randomising households to lifestyle interventions to delay cognitive decline feasible? A pilot study to determine the beliefs, preferences, and deterrents for households impacted by dementia based on semi-structured interviews</title><title>BMC geriatrics</title><addtitle>BMC Geriatr</addtitle><description>While lifestyle risk factors are implicated in the development and progression of cognitive impairment, interventional trials of individual participants have yielded unconvincing evidence. We sought to explore the development of lifestyle interventions targeting the household-unit.
Semi-structured interviews were carried out among eight households affected by cognitive impairment (i.e. member of the household had cognitive impairment). Interviews took place online using a secure, web-based video platform recommended for patient clinician interaction. Interview content was analysed, and important themes identified.
Eighteen participants were interviewed within households, of which eight (one per household) had cognitive impairment and others were spouses or first-degree relatives living in the same home. Several themes emerged; 1) household members without cognitive impairment were more likely to report poor sleep habits, and sleep was perceived to be the hardest behaviour to change; 2) diet generated most interest as a potential lifestyle intervention target as most participants believed there is a strong link with nutrition and cognition; 3) physical activity is challenging to adapt due to lack of motivation and focus when individuals are cognitively impaired. Barriers to study participation, including risk of harm, complexity of intervention and deviation from routine emerged during discussions.
This study identified beliefs and preferences of households towards lifestyle intervention trials. Findings from this study may be used to inform future clinical trial protocols and future qualitative studies should explore acceptability and feasibility of digital intervention applications.</description><subject>Behavior modification</subject><subject>Behavioural change</subject><subject>Brain research</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cognition disorders</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</subject><subject>Cognitive Dysfunction - prevention & control</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dementia - prevention & control</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Life Style</subject><subject>Lifestyle interventions</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Physical activity</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Qualitative</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><issn>1471-2318</issn><issn>1471-2318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUk1vFSEUnRiNrdU_4MKQuHHhVGA-YDaal8aPJk3c6JowcHmPhoEnMM-8P-5aplNrawyZAJdzz5x776mqlwSfE8L7d4lQzliNKS3f0JKaP6pOSctITRvCH987n1TPUrrGmDBO-6fVSdO1hGPSnFa_NhGQctZbJR3K0UqXUJReh8km67doF-YEu-B0QjkgZw2kfHSArM8QD-CzDf7mSYOTR6TC1ttsD1DuCy0gAzLZ0cEHtEF760JGKc_6uKYUjmkB5R2gEZwFk96ifQQDEbyCcilSVlwJ5IRMiPcl2WkvVQaNxmNBTYsciUaZSiR4lGCydcpxVnmOJbRqtvAzPa-emFIpvLjdz6rvnz5-u_hSX339fHmxuapVR9pc95wTaQYm5dB0TUt1R7Fh0CjaGEm1NGrUBrBsuOpGwAP0EgzlVI6058C75qy6XHl1kNdiH-0k41EEacVNIMStkDFb5UCosWe8YyNWgFsmGcdtS3BnGNOjbvVYuN6vXPt5nECrUmyU7gHpwxdvd2IbDmLAuBswLwRvbgli-DGXOYoyYwXOSQ-lpYL2HaYdLdIL9PU_0OswR19ataAoJsPQkb-orSwFWG9C-a9aSMWGYdxS3PcL6vw_qLLKwKwKHowt8QcJdE1QMaRUzHBXI8Ficb5YnS-K88WN88Wi-NX97tyl_LF68xuzBwYa</recordid><startdate>20220413</startdate><enddate>20220413</enddate><creator>Costello, Maria M</creator><creator>Mc Carthy, Christine E</creator><creator>Bosch, Jackie</creator><creator>Robinson, Stephanie</creator><creator>McDermott, Clodagh</creator><creator>Canavan, Michelle D</creator><creator>O'Donnell, Martin J</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220413</creationdate><title>Are clinical trials randomising households to lifestyle interventions to delay cognitive decline feasible? A pilot study to determine the beliefs, preferences, and deterrents for households impacted by dementia based on semi-structured interviews</title><author>Costello, Maria M ; Mc Carthy, Christine E ; Bosch, Jackie ; Robinson, Stephanie ; McDermott, Clodagh ; Canavan, Michelle D ; O'Donnell, Martin J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-6881af97aa935342d520f7e3c23fa2dafcbdfe0a38c5be09e6aef282ab268e853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Behavior modification</topic><topic>Behavioural change</topic><topic>Brain research</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cognition disorders</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology</topic><topic>Cognitive Dysfunction - prevention & control</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dementia - prevention & control</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Life Style</topic><topic>Lifestyle interventions</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Physical activity</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Qualitative</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Costello, Maria M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mc Carthy, Christine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosch, Jackie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDermott, Clodagh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canavan, Michelle D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Donnell, Martin J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Publicly Available Content database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC geriatrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Costello, Maria M</au><au>Mc Carthy, Christine E</au><au>Bosch, Jackie</au><au>Robinson, Stephanie</au><au>McDermott, Clodagh</au><au>Canavan, Michelle D</au><au>O'Donnell, Martin J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are clinical trials randomising households to lifestyle interventions to delay cognitive decline feasible? A pilot study to determine the beliefs, preferences, and deterrents for households impacted by dementia based on semi-structured interviews</atitle><jtitle>BMC geriatrics</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Geriatr</addtitle><date>2022-04-13</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>322</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>322-322</pages><artnum>322</artnum><issn>1471-2318</issn><eissn>1471-2318</eissn><abstract>While lifestyle risk factors are implicated in the development and progression of cognitive impairment, interventional trials of individual participants have yielded unconvincing evidence. We sought to explore the development of lifestyle interventions targeting the household-unit.
Semi-structured interviews were carried out among eight households affected by cognitive impairment (i.e. member of the household had cognitive impairment). Interviews took place online using a secure, web-based video platform recommended for patient clinician interaction. Interview content was analysed, and important themes identified.
Eighteen participants were interviewed within households, of which eight (one per household) had cognitive impairment and others were spouses or first-degree relatives living in the same home. Several themes emerged; 1) household members without cognitive impairment were more likely to report poor sleep habits, and sleep was perceived to be the hardest behaviour to change; 2) diet generated most interest as a potential lifestyle intervention target as most participants believed there is a strong link with nutrition and cognition; 3) physical activity is challenging to adapt due to lack of motivation and focus when individuals are cognitively impaired. Barriers to study participation, including risk of harm, complexity of intervention and deviation from routine emerged during discussions.
This study identified beliefs and preferences of households towards lifestyle intervention trials. Findings from this study may be used to inform future clinical trial protocols and future qualitative studies should explore acceptability and feasibility of digital intervention applications.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>35418013</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12877-022-02941-8</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1471-2318 |
ispartof | BMC geriatrics, 2022-04, Vol.22 (1), p.322-322, Article 322 |
issn | 1471-2318 1471-2318 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cb67857b0ce047a78044105f77dbd4db |
source | PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database; ProQuest Publicly Available Content database |
subjects | Behavior modification Behavioural change Brain research Caregivers Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic Cognition & reasoning Cognition disorders Cognitive ability Cognitive Dysfunction - epidemiology Cognitive Dysfunction - prevention & control Complications and side effects Consent Coronaviruses COVID-19 Dementia Dementia - epidemiology Dementia - prevention & control Dementia disorders Diet Exercise Geriatrics Health aspects Households Humans Intervention Interviews Life Style Lifestyle interventions Lifestyles Memory Motivation Older people Pandemics Patient outcomes Physical activity Pilot Projects Psychological aspects Qualitative Qualitative research Risk factors Sleep Social aspects |
title | Are clinical trials randomising households to lifestyle interventions to delay cognitive decline feasible? A pilot study to determine the beliefs, preferences, and deterrents for households impacted by dementia based on semi-structured interviews |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A16%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20clinical%20trials%20randomising%20households%20to%20lifestyle%20interventions%20to%20delay%20cognitive%20decline%20feasible?%20A%20pilot%20study%20to%20determine%20the%20beliefs,%20preferences,%20and%20deterrents%20for%20households%20impacted%20by%20dementia%20based%20on%20semi-structured%20interviews&rft.jtitle=BMC%20geriatrics&rft.au=Costello,%20Maria%20M&rft.date=2022-04-13&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=322&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=322-322&rft.artnum=322&rft.issn=1471-2318&rft.eissn=1471-2318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12877-022-02941-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA700420661%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-6881af97aa935342d520f7e3c23fa2dafcbdfe0a38c5be09e6aef282ab268e853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2652019951&rft_id=info:pmid/35418013&rft_galeid=A700420661&rfr_iscdi=true |