Consequences of using poly-ether-ether-ketone versus traditional implant on tibial cement penetration and short-term clinical outcomes during total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research 2023-08, Vol.18 (1), p.589-589, Article 589
• Main Authors: Zhao, Guanghui, Yao, Shuxin, Sun, Xiangxiang, Ma, Jianbing, Wang, Jianpeng
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Arthritis; Arthroplasty (knee); Bone cement penetration; Bone implants; Bone surgery; Cement; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; Cobalt; Implants, Artificial; Joint replacement surgery; Ketones; Knee; Molybdenum; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis; Pain management; Patients; PEEK; Polymethyl methacrylate; Prostheses; Prosthesis; Statistical analysis; Survival; Thrombosis; TKA; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 1749-799X; 1749-799X
• DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04064-1

The use of poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) prosthesis during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a relatively new concept. Several studies have suggested that the thickness of cement penetration during TKA may affect the stability of the implants. The present study aimed to compare the cement penetration and clinical performance between PEEK and traditional cobalt chromium molybdenum (CoCrMo) prosthesis during TKA. This study was a randomized controlled trial with level I of evidence. A total of 48 patients were randomly assigned to either the PEEK group (n = 24) or the CoCrMo group (n = 24). Mean bone cement penetration under the tibial baseplate was assessed radiographically in four zones in the anteroposterior view and two zones in the lateral view, in accordance with the Knee Society Scoring System. Furthermore, parameters such as the Knee Society Score (KSS), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, complications and survivorship at 1 year postoperatively were also compared. According to the results of this study, the mean bone cement penetration exhibited no significant difference between PEEK and CoCrMo groups (2.49 ± 0.61 mm vs. 2.53 ± 0.68 mm, p = 0.85). Additionally, there were no remarkable differences in the KSS clinical score, functional score, and VAS score between the two groups. Moreover, complications and survivorship were also statistically compared between the groups and presented no significant differences. Based on the current findings, it can be concluded that PEEK implant present similar bone cement penetration, short-term clinical outcomes, and survivorship with traditional CoCrMo implant in TKA without added complications. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100047563).