Loading…
Clinically significant findings in a decade‐long retrospective study of prenatal chromosomal microarray testing
Background Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is commonly utilized in the obstetrics setting. CMA is recommended when one or more fetal structural abnormalities is identified. CMA is also commonly used to determine genetic etiologies for miscarriages, fetal demise, and confirming positive prenatal cell‐fr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2024-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e2349-n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e76f85f6c97b29e52bda77036d30cef49a3ec2a758f22e3668f5cb105a54e89c3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | e2349 |
container_title | Molecular genetics & genomic medicine |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Olayiwola, Joie O. Marhabaie, Mohammad Koboldt, Daniel Matthews, Theodora Siemon, Amy Mouhlas, Danielle Porter, Taylor Kyle, George Myers, Cortlandt Mei, Hui Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire Babcock, Melanie Hunter, Jesse Schieffer, Kathleen M. Akkari, Yassmine Reshmi, Shalini Cottrell, Catherine Mathew, Mariam T. Leung, Marco L. |
description | Background
Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is commonly utilized in the obstetrics setting. CMA is recommended when one or more fetal structural abnormalities is identified. CMA is also commonly used to determine genetic etiologies for miscarriages, fetal demise, and confirming positive prenatal cell‐free DNA screening results.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively examined 523 prenatal and 319 products‐of‐conception (POC) CMA cases tested at Nationwide Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2020. We reviewed the referral indications, the diagnostic yield, and the reported copy number variants (CNV) findings. Results.
In our cohort, the diagnostic yield of clinically significant CNV findings for prenatal testing was 7.8% (n = 41/523) compared to POC testing (16.3%, n = 52/319). Abnormal ultrasound findings were the most common indication present in 81% of prenatal samples. Intrauterine fetal demise was the common indication identified in POC samples. The most common pathogenic finding observed in all samples was isolated trisomy 21, detected in seven samples.
Conclusion
Our CMA study supports the clinical utility of prenatal CMA for clinical management and identifying genetic etiology in POC arrays. In addition, it provides insight to the spectrum of prenatal and POC CMA results as detected in an academic hospital clinical laboratory setting that serves as a reference laboratory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mgg3.2349 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbb336865d6a46b69f88f107894147da</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cbb336865d6a46b69f88f107894147da</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2918199800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e76f85f6c97b29e52bda77036d30cef49a3ec2a758f22e3668f5cb105a54e89c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu3CAQhq2qURMlOfQFKqRemsMmGGwMx2rVbiOl6iU5IwyDywrDBuxGvvUR-ox5krLZNKoqlQsD-vRpZv6qelvjyxpjcjUOA70ktBGvqhNCSbMShInXf9XH1XnOW1wO503NujfVMeWEUc7ESXW_9i44rbxfUHZDcLY8woSsC8aFISMXkEIGtDLw-POXj2FACaYU8w705H4AytNsFhQt2iUIalIe6e8pjjHHsdSj0ymqlNSCJshTUZ5VR1b5DOfP92l19_nT7frL6ubb5nr98WalG16LFXTM8tYyLbqeCGhJb1TXYcoMxRpsIxQFTVTXcksIUMa4bXVf41a1DXCh6Wl1ffCaqLZyl9yo0iKjcvLpI6ZBqjQ57UHqvqeUcdYaphrWM2E5tzXuuGjqpjOquD4cXLsU7-cyhxxd1uC9ChDnLImoS8-CY1zQ9_-g2zinUCYtVFm5IKIThbo4UGU7OSewLw3WWO5jlftY5T7Wwr57Ns79COaF_BNiAa4OwIPzsPzfJL9uNvRJ-RvTqq22</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2986992979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinically significant findings in a decade‐long retrospective study of prenatal chromosomal microarray testing</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Olayiwola, Joie O. ; Marhabaie, Mohammad ; Koboldt, Daniel ; Matthews, Theodora ; Siemon, Amy ; Mouhlas, Danielle ; Porter, Taylor ; Kyle, George ; Myers, Cortlandt ; Mei, Hui ; Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire ; Babcock, Melanie ; Hunter, Jesse ; Schieffer, Kathleen M. ; Akkari, Yassmine ; Reshmi, Shalini ; Cottrell, Catherine ; Mathew, Mariam T. ; Leung, Marco L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Olayiwola, Joie O. ; Marhabaie, Mohammad ; Koboldt, Daniel ; Matthews, Theodora ; Siemon, Amy ; Mouhlas, Danielle ; Porter, Taylor ; Kyle, George ; Myers, Cortlandt ; Mei, Hui ; Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire ; Babcock, Melanie ; Hunter, Jesse ; Schieffer, Kathleen M. ; Akkari, Yassmine ; Reshmi, Shalini ; Cottrell, Catherine ; Mathew, Mariam T. ; Leung, Marco L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is commonly utilized in the obstetrics setting. CMA is recommended when one or more fetal structural abnormalities is identified. CMA is also commonly used to determine genetic etiologies for miscarriages, fetal demise, and confirming positive prenatal cell‐free DNA screening results.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively examined 523 prenatal and 319 products‐of‐conception (POC) CMA cases tested at Nationwide Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2020. We reviewed the referral indications, the diagnostic yield, and the reported copy number variants (CNV) findings. Results.
In our cohort, the diagnostic yield of clinically significant CNV findings for prenatal testing was 7.8% (n = 41/523) compared to POC testing (16.3%, n = 52/319). Abnormal ultrasound findings were the most common indication present in 81% of prenatal samples. Intrauterine fetal demise was the common indication identified in POC samples. The most common pathogenic finding observed in all samples was isolated trisomy 21, detected in seven samples.
Conclusion
Our CMA study supports the clinical utility of prenatal CMA for clinical management and identifying genetic etiology in POC arrays. In addition, it provides insight to the spectrum of prenatal and POC CMA results as detected in an academic hospital clinical laboratory setting that serves as a reference laboratory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2324-9269</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2324-9269</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2349</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38263869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abnormalities ; amniocentesis ; aneuploidy ; Arrays ; Child ; chromosomal microarray ; Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis ; Chromosome Disorders - genetics ; Chromosomes ; Clinical significance ; Copy number ; Diagnostic systems ; DNA microarrays ; Down Syndrome ; Etiology ; Female ; Fetal Death ; Fetuses ; Genetic screening ; Genetic testing ; Genomes ; genomics ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Indication ; Miscarriage ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; prenatal testing ; products of conception ; Retrospective Studies ; Software ; Trisomy ; Ultrasonic imaging</subject><ispartof>Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e2349-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e76f85f6c97b29e52bda77036d30cef49a3ec2a758f22e3668f5cb105a54e89c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7243-7314 ; 0000-0003-3312-8468 ; 0000-0002-2974-0235 ; 0000-0002-2688-8680 ; 0000-0003-2154-1909</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2986992979/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2986992979?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11562,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,46052,46476,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38263869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Olayiwola, Joie O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marhabaie, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koboldt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemon, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouhlas, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyle, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Cortlandt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babcock, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schieffer, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkari, Yassmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reshmi, Shalini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Mariam T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Marco L.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinically significant findings in a decade‐long retrospective study of prenatal chromosomal microarray testing</title><title>Molecular genetics & genomic medicine</title><addtitle>Mol Genet Genomic Med</addtitle><description>Background
Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is commonly utilized in the obstetrics setting. CMA is recommended when one or more fetal structural abnormalities is identified. CMA is also commonly used to determine genetic etiologies for miscarriages, fetal demise, and confirming positive prenatal cell‐free DNA screening results.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively examined 523 prenatal and 319 products‐of‐conception (POC) CMA cases tested at Nationwide Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2020. We reviewed the referral indications, the diagnostic yield, and the reported copy number variants (CNV) findings. Results.
In our cohort, the diagnostic yield of clinically significant CNV findings for prenatal testing was 7.8% (n = 41/523) compared to POC testing (16.3%, n = 52/319). Abnormal ultrasound findings were the most common indication present in 81% of prenatal samples. Intrauterine fetal demise was the common indication identified in POC samples. The most common pathogenic finding observed in all samples was isolated trisomy 21, detected in seven samples.
Conclusion
Our CMA study supports the clinical utility of prenatal CMA for clinical management and identifying genetic etiology in POC arrays. In addition, it provides insight to the spectrum of prenatal and POC CMA results as detected in an academic hospital clinical laboratory setting that serves as a reference laboratory.</description><subject>Abnormalities</subject><subject>amniocentesis</subject><subject>aneuploidy</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>chromosomal microarray</subject><subject>Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Chromosome Disorders - genetics</subject><subject>Chromosomes</subject><subject>Clinical significance</subject><subject>Copy number</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>DNA microarrays</subject><subject>Down Syndrome</subject><subject>Etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetal Death</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Genetic testing</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>genomics</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Indication</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>prenatal testing</subject><subject>products of conception</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Trisomy</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><issn>2324-9269</issn><issn>2324-9269</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu3CAQhq2qURMlOfQFKqRemsMmGGwMx2rVbiOl6iU5IwyDywrDBuxGvvUR-ox5krLZNKoqlQsD-vRpZv6qelvjyxpjcjUOA70ktBGvqhNCSbMShInXf9XH1XnOW1wO503NujfVMeWEUc7ESXW_9i44rbxfUHZDcLY8woSsC8aFISMXkEIGtDLw-POXj2FACaYU8w705H4AytNsFhQt2iUIalIe6e8pjjHHsdSj0ymqlNSCJshTUZ5VR1b5DOfP92l19_nT7frL6ubb5nr98WalG16LFXTM8tYyLbqeCGhJb1TXYcoMxRpsIxQFTVTXcksIUMa4bXVf41a1DXCh6Wl1ffCaqLZyl9yo0iKjcvLpI6ZBqjQ57UHqvqeUcdYaphrWM2E5tzXuuGjqpjOquD4cXLsU7-cyhxxd1uC9ChDnLImoS8-CY1zQ9_-g2zinUCYtVFm5IKIThbo4UGU7OSewLw3WWO5jlftY5T7Wwr57Ns79COaF_BNiAa4OwIPzsPzfJL9uNvRJ-RvTqq22</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Olayiwola, Joie O.</creator><creator>Marhabaie, Mohammad</creator><creator>Koboldt, Daniel</creator><creator>Matthews, Theodora</creator><creator>Siemon, Amy</creator><creator>Mouhlas, Danielle</creator><creator>Porter, Taylor</creator><creator>Kyle, George</creator><creator>Myers, Cortlandt</creator><creator>Mei, Hui</creator><creator>Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire</creator><creator>Babcock, Melanie</creator><creator>Hunter, Jesse</creator><creator>Schieffer, Kathleen M.</creator><creator>Akkari, Yassmine</creator><creator>Reshmi, Shalini</creator><creator>Cottrell, Catherine</creator><creator>Mathew, Mariam T.</creator><creator>Leung, Marco L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-7314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-8468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-0235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-8680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-1909</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Clinically significant findings in a decade‐long retrospective study of prenatal chromosomal microarray testing</title><author>Olayiwola, Joie O. ; Marhabaie, Mohammad ; Koboldt, Daniel ; Matthews, Theodora ; Siemon, Amy ; Mouhlas, Danielle ; Porter, Taylor ; Kyle, George ; Myers, Cortlandt ; Mei, Hui ; Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire ; Babcock, Melanie ; Hunter, Jesse ; Schieffer, Kathleen M. ; Akkari, Yassmine ; Reshmi, Shalini ; Cottrell, Catherine ; Mathew, Mariam T. ; Leung, Marco L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e76f85f6c97b29e52bda77036d30cef49a3ec2a758f22e3668f5cb105a54e89c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abnormalities</topic><topic>amniocentesis</topic><topic>aneuploidy</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>chromosomal microarray</topic><topic>Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Chromosome Disorders - genetics</topic><topic>Chromosomes</topic><topic>Clinical significance</topic><topic>Copy number</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>DNA microarrays</topic><topic>Down Syndrome</topic><topic>Etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetal Death</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Genetic testing</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>genomics</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Indication</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>prenatal testing</topic><topic>products of conception</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Trisomy</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Olayiwola, Joie O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marhabaie, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koboldt, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Theodora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemon, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mouhlas, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porter, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyle, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Cortlandt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mei, Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babcock, Melanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schieffer, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akkari, Yassmine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reshmi, Shalini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cottrell, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathew, Mariam T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Marco L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Molecular genetics & genomic medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Olayiwola, Joie O.</au><au>Marhabaie, Mohammad</au><au>Koboldt, Daniel</au><au>Matthews, Theodora</au><au>Siemon, Amy</au><au>Mouhlas, Danielle</au><au>Porter, Taylor</au><au>Kyle, George</au><au>Myers, Cortlandt</au><au>Mei, Hui</au><au>Hou, Ying‐Chen Claire</au><au>Babcock, Melanie</au><au>Hunter, Jesse</au><au>Schieffer, Kathleen M.</au><au>Akkari, Yassmine</au><au>Reshmi, Shalini</au><au>Cottrell, Catherine</au><au>Mathew, Mariam T.</au><au>Leung, Marco L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinically significant findings in a decade‐long retrospective study of prenatal chromosomal microarray testing</atitle><jtitle>Molecular genetics & genomic medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Genet Genomic Med</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e2349</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2349-n/a</pages><issn>2324-9269</issn><eissn>2324-9269</eissn><abstract>Background
Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is commonly utilized in the obstetrics setting. CMA is recommended when one or more fetal structural abnormalities is identified. CMA is also commonly used to determine genetic etiologies for miscarriages, fetal demise, and confirming positive prenatal cell‐free DNA screening results.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively examined 523 prenatal and 319 products‐of‐conception (POC) CMA cases tested at Nationwide Children's Hospital from 2011 to 2020. We reviewed the referral indications, the diagnostic yield, and the reported copy number variants (CNV) findings. Results.
In our cohort, the diagnostic yield of clinically significant CNV findings for prenatal testing was 7.8% (n = 41/523) compared to POC testing (16.3%, n = 52/319). Abnormal ultrasound findings were the most common indication present in 81% of prenatal samples. Intrauterine fetal demise was the common indication identified in POC samples. The most common pathogenic finding observed in all samples was isolated trisomy 21, detected in seven samples.
Conclusion
Our CMA study supports the clinical utility of prenatal CMA for clinical management and identifying genetic etiology in POC arrays. In addition, it provides insight to the spectrum of prenatal and POC CMA results as detected in an academic hospital clinical laboratory setting that serves as a reference laboratory.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38263869</pmid><doi>10.1002/mgg3.2349</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-7314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3312-8468</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2974-0235</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2688-8680</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2154-1909</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2324-9269 |
ispartof | Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2024-03, Vol.12 (3), p.e2349-n/a |
issn | 2324-9269 2324-9269 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbb336865d6a46b69f88f107894147da |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access |
subjects | Abnormalities amniocentesis aneuploidy Arrays Child chromosomal microarray Chromosome Disorders - diagnosis Chromosome Disorders - genetics Chromosomes Clinical significance Copy number Diagnostic systems DNA microarrays Down Syndrome Etiology Female Fetal Death Fetuses Genetic screening Genetic testing Genomes genomics Hospitals Humans Indication Miscarriage Obstetrics Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis - methods prenatal testing products of conception Retrospective Studies Software Trisomy Ultrasonic imaging |
title | Clinically significant findings in a decade‐long retrospective study of prenatal chromosomal microarray testing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A24%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinically%20significant%20findings%20in%20a%20decade%E2%80%90long%20retrospective%20study%20of%20prenatal%20chromosomal%20microarray%20testing&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20genetics%20&%20genomic%20medicine&rft.au=Olayiwola,%20Joie%20O.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e2349&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2349-n/a&rft.issn=2324-9269&rft.eissn=2324-9269&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mgg3.2349&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2918199800%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4819-e76f85f6c97b29e52bda77036d30cef49a3ec2a758f22e3668f5cb105a54e89c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2986992979&rft_id=info:pmid/38263869&rfr_iscdi=true |