Loading…

Physical and psychological recovery after vaginal childbirth with and without epidural analgesia: A prospective cohort study

BackgroundEnhanced recovery is the gold standard in modern perioperative management, including that for cesarean deliveries. However, qualitative and quantitative data on the physical and psychological recovery of women after vaginal childbirth are limited. Whether neuraxial labor analgesia influenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:PloS one 2023-01, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292393
Main Authors: Ayumi Maeda, Rimu Suzuki, Rie Maurer, Sumie Kurokawa, Miki Kaneko, Rie Sato, Hiromi Nakajima, Kyoko Ogura, Michiko Yamanaka, Tokujiro Uchida, Yasuko Nagasaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page e0292393
container_title PloS one
container_volume 18
creator Ayumi Maeda
Rimu Suzuki
Rie Maurer
Sumie Kurokawa
Miki Kaneko
Rie Sato
Hiromi Nakajima
Kyoko Ogura
Michiko Yamanaka
Tokujiro Uchida
Yasuko Nagasaka
description BackgroundEnhanced recovery is the gold standard in modern perioperative management, including that for cesarean deliveries. However, qualitative and quantitative data on the physical and psychological recovery of women after vaginal childbirth are limited. Whether neuraxial labor analgesia influences postpartum recovery is unknown.MethodsPrimiparous women anticipating a vaginal childbirth between January 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled. Women with major comorbidities or postpartum complications and those who underwent a cesarean delivery were excluded. Daily step count was measured using a wrist-worn activity tracker (FitbitTM Inspire HR) for 120 hours after vaginal childbirth. Subjective fatigue levels and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), respectively, at the 3rd trimester antenatal visit, on postpartum day 1 and 3, and at the one-month postpartum visit. Rest and dynamic pain scores and the location of pain were documented by participants during postpartum hospitalization.ResultsAmong 300 women who were enrolled antenatally, 95 and 116 had a vaginal delivery without (NCB group) and with (EPL group) epidural analgesia, respectively. The median number of steps per 24 hours increased daily in both groups, and no significant difference was detected between the groups. Postpartum pain was mild overall, with median rest and dynamic pain scores being less than 4 and similar between the groups. MFI and EQ-5D-5L scores were the worst on postpartum day 1 in both groups and gradually improved to antepartum level by the one-month postpartum visit. Higher MFI score on postpartum day 1, but not the use of epidural analgesia, was associated with lower odds of achieving adequate postpartum ambulation (defined as >3500 steps between 48 and 72 hours postpartum).ConclusionThe use of epidural analgesia was not associated with worse recovery outcomes during postpartum hospitalization.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR, #UMIN000039343, registered on January 31, 2020.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0292393
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjM1KxDAUhYMgOP68gYu8wNQmaTqtOxFFdy7cl9vbTJsSe0OSVgo-vDPFR3BzzuGD8zF2L_JMqIN4GGkOE7jM02SyXNZS1eqC7USt5L6Uubpi1zGOea5VVZY79vMxrNEiOA5Tx31ccSBH_UaCQVpMWDkckwl8gd6ezBwH67rWhjTwb3uK8_E8aE7ceNvNYbOB60208MifuA8UvcFkF8ORBgqJxzR36y27PIKL5u6vb9j768vn89u-IxgbH-wXhLUhsM0GKPQNhGTRmQZbU7dYFAZ0W6CUlRQHARqrQmjUGtV_un4BGbdydg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physical and psychological recovery after vaginal childbirth with and without epidural analgesia: A prospective cohort study</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ayumi Maeda ; Rimu Suzuki ; Rie Maurer ; Sumie Kurokawa ; Miki Kaneko ; Rie Sato ; Hiromi Nakajima ; Kyoko Ogura ; Michiko Yamanaka ; Tokujiro Uchida ; Yasuko Nagasaka</creator><creatorcontrib>Ayumi Maeda ; Rimu Suzuki ; Rie Maurer ; Sumie Kurokawa ; Miki Kaneko ; Rie Sato ; Hiromi Nakajima ; Kyoko Ogura ; Michiko Yamanaka ; Tokujiro Uchida ; Yasuko Nagasaka</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundEnhanced recovery is the gold standard in modern perioperative management, including that for cesarean deliveries. However, qualitative and quantitative data on the physical and psychological recovery of women after vaginal childbirth are limited. Whether neuraxial labor analgesia influences postpartum recovery is unknown.MethodsPrimiparous women anticipating a vaginal childbirth between January 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled. Women with major comorbidities or postpartum complications and those who underwent a cesarean delivery were excluded. Daily step count was measured using a wrist-worn activity tracker (FitbitTM Inspire HR) for 120 hours after vaginal childbirth. Subjective fatigue levels and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), respectively, at the 3rd trimester antenatal visit, on postpartum day 1 and 3, and at the one-month postpartum visit. Rest and dynamic pain scores and the location of pain were documented by participants during postpartum hospitalization.ResultsAmong 300 women who were enrolled antenatally, 95 and 116 had a vaginal delivery without (NCB group) and with (EPL group) epidural analgesia, respectively. The median number of steps per 24 hours increased daily in both groups, and no significant difference was detected between the groups. Postpartum pain was mild overall, with median rest and dynamic pain scores being less than 4 and similar between the groups. MFI and EQ-5D-5L scores were the worst on postpartum day 1 in both groups and gradually improved to antepartum level by the one-month postpartum visit. Higher MFI score on postpartum day 1, but not the use of epidural analgesia, was associated with lower odds of achieving adequate postpartum ambulation (defined as &gt;3500 steps between 48 and 72 hours postpartum).ConclusionThe use of epidural analgesia was not associated with worse recovery outcomes during postpartum hospitalization.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR, #UMIN000039343, registered on January 31, 2020.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292393</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</publisher><ispartof>PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292393</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ayumi Maeda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimu Suzuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rie Maurer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumie Kurokawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miki Kaneko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rie Sato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiromi Nakajima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyoko Ogura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michiko Yamanaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokujiro Uchida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuko Nagasaka</creatorcontrib><title>Physical and psychological recovery after vaginal childbirth with and without epidural analgesia: A prospective cohort study</title><title>PloS one</title><description>BackgroundEnhanced recovery is the gold standard in modern perioperative management, including that for cesarean deliveries. However, qualitative and quantitative data on the physical and psychological recovery of women after vaginal childbirth are limited. Whether neuraxial labor analgesia influences postpartum recovery is unknown.MethodsPrimiparous women anticipating a vaginal childbirth between January 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled. Women with major comorbidities or postpartum complications and those who underwent a cesarean delivery were excluded. Daily step count was measured using a wrist-worn activity tracker (FitbitTM Inspire HR) for 120 hours after vaginal childbirth. Subjective fatigue levels and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), respectively, at the 3rd trimester antenatal visit, on postpartum day 1 and 3, and at the one-month postpartum visit. Rest and dynamic pain scores and the location of pain were documented by participants during postpartum hospitalization.ResultsAmong 300 women who were enrolled antenatally, 95 and 116 had a vaginal delivery without (NCB group) and with (EPL group) epidural analgesia, respectively. The median number of steps per 24 hours increased daily in both groups, and no significant difference was detected between the groups. Postpartum pain was mild overall, with median rest and dynamic pain scores being less than 4 and similar between the groups. MFI and EQ-5D-5L scores were the worst on postpartum day 1 in both groups and gradually improved to antepartum level by the one-month postpartum visit. Higher MFI score on postpartum day 1, but not the use of epidural analgesia, was associated with lower odds of achieving adequate postpartum ambulation (defined as &gt;3500 steps between 48 and 72 hours postpartum).ConclusionThe use of epidural analgesia was not associated with worse recovery outcomes during postpartum hospitalization.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR, #UMIN000039343, registered on January 31, 2020.</description><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjM1KxDAUhYMgOP68gYu8wNQmaTqtOxFFdy7cl9vbTJsSe0OSVgo-vDPFR3BzzuGD8zF2L_JMqIN4GGkOE7jM02SyXNZS1eqC7USt5L6Uubpi1zGOea5VVZY79vMxrNEiOA5Tx31ccSBH_UaCQVpMWDkckwl8gd6ezBwH67rWhjTwb3uK8_E8aE7ceNvNYbOB60208MifuA8UvcFkF8ORBgqJxzR36y27PIKL5u6vb9j768vn89u-IxgbH-wXhLUhsM0GKPQNhGTRmQZbU7dYFAZ0W6CUlRQHARqrQmjUGtV_un4BGbdydg</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Ayumi Maeda</creator><creator>Rimu Suzuki</creator><creator>Rie Maurer</creator><creator>Sumie Kurokawa</creator><creator>Miki Kaneko</creator><creator>Rie Sato</creator><creator>Hiromi Nakajima</creator><creator>Kyoko Ogura</creator><creator>Michiko Yamanaka</creator><creator>Tokujiro Uchida</creator><creator>Yasuko Nagasaka</creator><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Physical and psychological recovery after vaginal childbirth with and without epidural analgesia: A prospective cohort study</title><author>Ayumi Maeda ; Rimu Suzuki ; Rie Maurer ; Sumie Kurokawa ; Miki Kaneko ; Rie Sato ; Hiromi Nakajima ; Kyoko Ogura ; Michiko Yamanaka ; Tokujiro Uchida ; Yasuko Nagasaka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ayumi Maeda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimu Suzuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rie Maurer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sumie Kurokawa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miki Kaneko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rie Sato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiromi Nakajima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyoko Ogura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michiko Yamanaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tokujiro Uchida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yasuko Nagasaka</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ayumi Maeda</au><au>Rimu Suzuki</au><au>Rie Maurer</au><au>Sumie Kurokawa</au><au>Miki Kaneko</au><au>Rie Sato</au><au>Hiromi Nakajima</au><au>Kyoko Ogura</au><au>Michiko Yamanaka</au><au>Tokujiro Uchida</au><au>Yasuko Nagasaka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physical and psychological recovery after vaginal childbirth with and without epidural analgesia: A prospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e0292393</spage><pages>e0292393-</pages><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>BackgroundEnhanced recovery is the gold standard in modern perioperative management, including that for cesarean deliveries. However, qualitative and quantitative data on the physical and psychological recovery of women after vaginal childbirth are limited. Whether neuraxial labor analgesia influences postpartum recovery is unknown.MethodsPrimiparous women anticipating a vaginal childbirth between January 2020 and May 2021 were enrolled. Women with major comorbidities or postpartum complications and those who underwent a cesarean delivery were excluded. Daily step count was measured using a wrist-worn activity tracker (FitbitTM Inspire HR) for 120 hours after vaginal childbirth. Subjective fatigue levels and health-related quality of life were assessed using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L), respectively, at the 3rd trimester antenatal visit, on postpartum day 1 and 3, and at the one-month postpartum visit. Rest and dynamic pain scores and the location of pain were documented by participants during postpartum hospitalization.ResultsAmong 300 women who were enrolled antenatally, 95 and 116 had a vaginal delivery without (NCB group) and with (EPL group) epidural analgesia, respectively. The median number of steps per 24 hours increased daily in both groups, and no significant difference was detected between the groups. Postpartum pain was mild overall, with median rest and dynamic pain scores being less than 4 and similar between the groups. MFI and EQ-5D-5L scores were the worst on postpartum day 1 in both groups and gradually improved to antepartum level by the one-month postpartum visit. Higher MFI score on postpartum day 1, but not the use of epidural analgesia, was associated with lower odds of achieving adequate postpartum ambulation (defined as &gt;3500 steps between 48 and 72 hours postpartum).ConclusionThe use of epidural analgesia was not associated with worse recovery outcomes during postpartum hospitalization.Trial registrationUMIN-CTR, #UMIN000039343, registered on January 31, 2020.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0292393</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2023-01, Vol.18 (10), p.e0292393
issn 1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c
source Publicly Available Content Database; PubMed Central
title Physical and psychological recovery after vaginal childbirth with and without epidural analgesia: A prospective cohort study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A30%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physical%20and%20psychological%20recovery%20after%20vaginal%20childbirth%20with%20and%20without%20epidural%20analgesia:%20A%20prospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ayumi%20Maeda&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e0292393&rft.pages=e0292393-&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0292393&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c%3C/doaj%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cbe9bc44ea5b4c2282171a5c8415c55c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true