Loading…

Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition

In 2015 the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health fac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC health services research 2021-05, Vol.21 (1), p.457-457, Article 457
Main Authors: Rodríguez, Daniela C, Mohan, Diwakar, Mackenzie, Caroline, Wilhelm, Jess, Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne, Omondi, Elizabeth, Qiu, Mary, Bennett, Sara
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43
container_end_page 457
container_issue 1
container_start_page 457
container_title BMC health services research
container_volume 21
creator Rodríguez, Daniela C
Mohan, Diwakar
Mackenzie, Caroline
Wilhelm, Jess
Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne
Omondi, Elizabeth
Qiu, Mary
Bennett, Sara
description In 2015 the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health facilities in Northeastern Kenya to be transitioned to government support (known as central support (CS)). We conducted a mixed methods evaluation exploring the effect of GP on health systems, and HIV and non-HIV service delivery in CS facilities. Quantitative data from a facility survey and health service delivery data were gathered and combined with data from two rounds of interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted at national and sub-national level to document the design and implementation of GP. The survey included 230 health facilities across 10 counties, and 59 interviews and 22 FGDs were conducted with government officials, health facility providers, patients, and civil society. We found that PEPFAR moved quickly from announcing the GP to implementation. Despite extensive conversations between the US government and the Government of Kenya, there was little consultation with sub-national actors even though the country had recently undergone a major devolution process. Survey and qualitative data identified a number of effects from GP, including discontinuation of certain services, declines in quality and access to HIV care, loss of training and financial incentives for health workers, and disruption of laboratory testing. Despite these reports, service coverage had not been greatly affected; however, clinician strikes in the post-transition period were potential confounders. This study found similar effects to earlier research on transition and provides additional insights about internal country transitions, particularly in decentralized contexts. Aside from a need for longer planning periods and better communication and coordination, we raise concerns about transitions driven by epidemiological criteria without adaptation to the local context and their implication for priority-setting and HIV investments at the local level.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12913-021-06451-y
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cc32bc9dd8de4a30a2add1dedd5c6619</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A665430195</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cc32bc9dd8de4a30a2add1dedd5c6619</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A665430195</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIREvgD3BAlrhw2eKPtdfLAamqCo2oxAW4Wl57nDjatYu9iZoD_x0nKSVByJY8Gr_zjMd6q-o1wReESPE-E9oRVmNKaiwaTurtk-qcNC2tRSfY06P4rHqR8wpj0kraPq_OGOskbyQ9r35dOwdmyig6NCUdsp98DKjsm_kPpINFIYZ6F2dIG28g75NL0MO0RHmbJxgz8gF9gbDVH5BGo78Hi0aYltFmBBs9rPWB6ZCNIaajPi-rZ04PGV49nLPq-6frb1c39e3Xz_Ory9vacMGmmhpHO9FLxywRojO009Bz4VgreXl9I3sqaI8pB44BgLTONtJRQbRpAEPDZtX8wLVRr9Rd8qNOWxW1V_tETAul0-TNAMoYRnvTWSstNJphTbW1xIK13AhBusL6eGDdrfsRrIFQ5hlOoKc3wS_VIm6UJKQVhBXAuwdAij_XkCc1-mxgGHSAuM6KcirJToyL9O0_0lVcp1C-aq-SouOs-ata6DKADy6WvmYHVZdC8IZhUnSz6uI_qrIsjN7EAM6X_EkBPRSYFHNO4B5nJFjtDKgOBlTFgGpvQLUtRW-Of-ex5I_j2G9Ym9eg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528869534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Rodríguez, Daniela C ; Mohan, Diwakar ; Mackenzie, Caroline ; Wilhelm, Jess ; Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne ; Omondi, Elizabeth ; Qiu, Mary ; Bennett, Sara</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Daniela C ; Mohan, Diwakar ; Mackenzie, Caroline ; Wilhelm, Jess ; Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne ; Omondi, Elizabeth ; Qiu, Mary ; Bennett, Sara</creatorcontrib><description>In 2015 the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health facilities in Northeastern Kenya to be transitioned to government support (known as central support (CS)). We conducted a mixed methods evaluation exploring the effect of GP on health systems, and HIV and non-HIV service delivery in CS facilities. Quantitative data from a facility survey and health service delivery data were gathered and combined with data from two rounds of interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted at national and sub-national level to document the design and implementation of GP. The survey included 230 health facilities across 10 counties, and 59 interviews and 22 FGDs were conducted with government officials, health facility providers, patients, and civil society. We found that PEPFAR moved quickly from announcing the GP to implementation. Despite extensive conversations between the US government and the Government of Kenya, there was little consultation with sub-national actors even though the country had recently undergone a major devolution process. Survey and qualitative data identified a number of effects from GP, including discontinuation of certain services, declines in quality and access to HIV care, loss of training and financial incentives for health workers, and disruption of laboratory testing. Despite these reports, service coverage had not been greatly affected; however, clinician strikes in the post-transition period were potential confounders. This study found similar effects to earlier research on transition and provides additional insights about internal country transitions, particularly in decentralized contexts. Aside from a need for longer planning periods and better communication and coordination, we raise concerns about transitions driven by epidemiological criteria without adaptation to the local context and their implication for priority-setting and HIV investments at the local level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6963</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06451-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33985482</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome ; AIDS ; Care and treatment ; Civil society ; Community health services ; Data collection ; Donor transition ; Family planning ; Government Programs ; Health Facilities ; Health Services ; Health systems ; HIV ; HIV infection ; HIV Infections - epidemiology ; HIV Infections - therapy ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Influence ; Interviews ; Kenya ; Kenya - epidemiology ; Management ; Mixed methods research ; Mixed-methods evaluation ; Population ; Public officials ; Qualitative research ; Sustainability ; Transitional care ; Transitions</subject><ispartof>BMC health services research, 2021-05, Vol.21 (1), p.457-457, Article 457</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2523-1123</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8117613/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2528869534?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,11667,25731,27901,27902,36037,36038,36989,36990,44339,44566,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33985482$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Daniela C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Diwakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omondi, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Sara</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition</title><title>BMC health services research</title><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>In 2015 the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health facilities in Northeastern Kenya to be transitioned to government support (known as central support (CS)). We conducted a mixed methods evaluation exploring the effect of GP on health systems, and HIV and non-HIV service delivery in CS facilities. Quantitative data from a facility survey and health service delivery data were gathered and combined with data from two rounds of interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted at national and sub-national level to document the design and implementation of GP. The survey included 230 health facilities across 10 counties, and 59 interviews and 22 FGDs were conducted with government officials, health facility providers, patients, and civil society. We found that PEPFAR moved quickly from announcing the GP to implementation. Despite extensive conversations between the US government and the Government of Kenya, there was little consultation with sub-national actors even though the country had recently undergone a major devolution process. Survey and qualitative data identified a number of effects from GP, including discontinuation of certain services, declines in quality and access to HIV care, loss of training and financial incentives for health workers, and disruption of laboratory testing. Despite these reports, service coverage had not been greatly affected; however, clinician strikes in the post-transition period were potential confounders. This study found similar effects to earlier research on transition and provides additional insights about internal country transitions, particularly in decentralized contexts. Aside from a need for longer planning periods and better communication and coordination, we raise concerns about transitions driven by epidemiological criteria without adaptation to the local context and their implication for priority-setting and HIV investments at the local level.</description><subject>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</subject><subject>AIDS</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Civil society</subject><subject>Community health services</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Donor transition</subject><subject>Family planning</subject><subject>Government Programs</subject><subject>Health Facilities</subject><subject>Health Services</subject><subject>Health systems</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>HIV infection</subject><subject>HIV Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>HIV Infections - therapy</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Kenya</subject><subject>Kenya - epidemiology</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Mixed-methods evaluation</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Transitional care</subject><subject>Transitions</subject><issn>1472-6963</issn><issn>1472-6963</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1vEzEQhlcIREvgD3BAlrhw2eKPtdfLAamqCo2oxAW4Wl57nDjatYu9iZoD_x0nKSVByJY8Gr_zjMd6q-o1wReESPE-E9oRVmNKaiwaTurtk-qcNC2tRSfY06P4rHqR8wpj0kraPq_OGOskbyQ9r35dOwdmyig6NCUdsp98DKjsm_kPpINFIYZ6F2dIG28g75NL0MO0RHmbJxgz8gF9gbDVH5BGo78Hi0aYltFmBBs9rPWB6ZCNIaajPi-rZ04PGV49nLPq-6frb1c39e3Xz_Ory9vacMGmmhpHO9FLxywRojO009Bz4VgreXl9I3sqaI8pB44BgLTONtJRQbRpAEPDZtX8wLVRr9Rd8qNOWxW1V_tETAul0-TNAMoYRnvTWSstNJphTbW1xIK13AhBusL6eGDdrfsRrIFQ5hlOoKc3wS_VIm6UJKQVhBXAuwdAij_XkCc1-mxgGHSAuM6KcirJToyL9O0_0lVcp1C-aq-SouOs-ata6DKADy6WvmYHVZdC8IZhUnSz6uI_qrIsjN7EAM6X_EkBPRSYFHNO4B5nJFjtDKgOBlTFgGpvQLUtRW-Of-ex5I_j2G9Ym9eg</recordid><startdate>20210513</startdate><enddate>20210513</enddate><creator>Rodríguez, Daniela C</creator><creator>Mohan, Diwakar</creator><creator>Mackenzie, Caroline</creator><creator>Wilhelm, Jess</creator><creator>Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne</creator><creator>Omondi, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Qiu, Mary</creator><creator>Bennett, Sara</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2523-1123</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210513</creationdate><title>Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition</title><author>Rodríguez, Daniela C ; Mohan, Diwakar ; Mackenzie, Caroline ; Wilhelm, Jess ; Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne ; Omondi, Elizabeth ; Qiu, Mary ; Bennett, Sara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acquired immune deficiency syndrome</topic><topic>AIDS</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Civil society</topic><topic>Community health services</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Donor transition</topic><topic>Family planning</topic><topic>Government Programs</topic><topic>Health Facilities</topic><topic>Health Services</topic><topic>Health systems</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>HIV infection</topic><topic>HIV Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>HIV Infections - therapy</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Kenya</topic><topic>Kenya - epidemiology</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Mixed-methods evaluation</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Transitional care</topic><topic>Transitions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Daniela C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Diwakar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm, Jess</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omondi, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiu, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Sara</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez, Daniela C</au><au>Mohan, Diwakar</au><au>Mackenzie, Caroline</au><au>Wilhelm, Jess</au><au>Eze-Ajoku, Ezinne</au><au>Omondi, Elizabeth</au><au>Qiu, Mary</au><au>Bennett, Sara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition</atitle><jtitle>BMC health services research</jtitle><addtitle>BMC Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2021-05-13</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>457</spage><epage>457</epage><pages>457-457</pages><artnum>457</artnum><issn>1472-6963</issn><eissn>1472-6963</eissn><abstract>In 2015 the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) initiated its Geographic Prioritization (GP) process whereby it prioritized high burden areas within countries, with the goal of more rapidly achieving the UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets. In Kenya, PEPFAR designated over 400 health facilities in Northeastern Kenya to be transitioned to government support (known as central support (CS)). We conducted a mixed methods evaluation exploring the effect of GP on health systems, and HIV and non-HIV service delivery in CS facilities. Quantitative data from a facility survey and health service delivery data were gathered and combined with data from two rounds of interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) conducted at national and sub-national level to document the design and implementation of GP. The survey included 230 health facilities across 10 counties, and 59 interviews and 22 FGDs were conducted with government officials, health facility providers, patients, and civil society. We found that PEPFAR moved quickly from announcing the GP to implementation. Despite extensive conversations between the US government and the Government of Kenya, there was little consultation with sub-national actors even though the country had recently undergone a major devolution process. Survey and qualitative data identified a number of effects from GP, including discontinuation of certain services, declines in quality and access to HIV care, loss of training and financial incentives for health workers, and disruption of laboratory testing. Despite these reports, service coverage had not been greatly affected; however, clinician strikes in the post-transition period were potential confounders. This study found similar effects to earlier research on transition and provides additional insights about internal country transitions, particularly in decentralized contexts. Aside from a need for longer planning periods and better communication and coordination, we raise concerns about transitions driven by epidemiological criteria without adaptation to the local context and their implication for priority-setting and HIV investments at the local level.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>33985482</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12913-021-06451-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2523-1123</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1472-6963
ispartof BMC health services research, 2021-05, Vol.21 (1), p.457-457, Article 457
issn 1472-6963
1472-6963
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cc32bc9dd8de4a30a2add1dedd5c6619
source Publicly Available Content Database; ABI/INFORM Global; PubMed Central
subjects Acquired immune deficiency syndrome
AIDS
Care and treatment
Civil society
Community health services
Data collection
Donor transition
Family planning
Government Programs
Health Facilities
Health Services
Health systems
HIV
HIV infection
HIV Infections - epidemiology
HIV Infections - therapy
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Influence
Interviews
Kenya
Kenya - epidemiology
Management
Mixed methods research
Mixed-methods evaluation
Population
Public officials
Qualitative research
Sustainability
Transitional care
Transitions
title Effects of transition on HIV and non-HIV services and health systems in Kenya: a mixed methods evaluation of donor transition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A26%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20transition%20on%20HIV%20and%20non-HIV%20services%20and%20health%20systems%20in%20Kenya:%20a%20mixed%20methods%20evaluation%20of%20donor%20transition&rft.jtitle=BMC%20health%20services%20research&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Daniela%20C&rft.date=2021-05-13&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=457&rft.epage=457&rft.pages=457-457&rft.artnum=457&rft.issn=1472-6963&rft.eissn=1472-6963&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12913-021-06451-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA665430195%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-2cf296b8f3d1669c29aeb56f3785fec48b262b025e50eee17fd48f261ac4e0e43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528869534&rft_id=info:pmid/33985482&rft_galeid=A665430195&rfr_iscdi=true