Loading…

Effects of Different Processing Methods of Coffee Arabica on Colour, Acrylamide, Caffeine, Chlorogenic Acid, and Polyphenol Content

An effect of a processing method (dry and wet) and a degree of roasting (light, medium, and dark) of 15 coffee ( ) samples on the content of caffeine, chlorogenic acid (CQA), total polyphenols (TPP), acrylamide (AA), and on the colour parameters L*, a*, and b* was evaluated. Neither processing nor r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Foods 2022-10, Vol.11 (20), p.3295
Main Authors: Cwiková, Olga, Komprda, Tomas, Šottníková, Viera, Svoboda, Zdeněk, Simonová, Jana, Slováček, Jan, Jůzl, Miroslav
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An effect of a processing method (dry and wet) and a degree of roasting (light, medium, and dark) of 15 coffee ( ) samples on the content of caffeine, chlorogenic acid (CQA), total polyphenols (TPP), acrylamide (AA), and on the colour parameters L*, a*, and b* was evaluated. Neither processing nor roasting affected caffeine content ( > 0.05). The degree of roasting accounted for 46% and 72% of explained variability of the CQA content and AA content, respectively ( < 0.05). AA content was in the range from 250 (wet-processed, light-roasted samples) to 305 µg·kg (wet-processed, dark-roasted coffees), but the dark roasting only tended ( > 0.05) to increase AA content. Wet-processed, dry-roasted coffee had higher ( 0.05) TPP content (48.5 mg·g ) than its dry-processed, dry-roasted counterpart (42.5 mg·g ); the method of processing accounted for 70% of explained variability of TPP. Both the method of processing and the degree of roasting affected the L*, a*, and b* values ( < 0.01), but the lower values ( < 0.05) of these parameters in the dark-roasted samples were found only within the wet processing. A negative correlation between the AA content and lightness (L*) was established (r = -0.39, < 0.05). It was concluded that from the consumers' viewpoint, the results of the present study indicate relatively small differences in quality parameters of coffee irrespective of the method of processing or degree of roasting.
ISSN:2304-8158
2304-8158
DOI:10.3390/foods11203295