Loading…

Family SES, family social capital, and general health in Chinese adults: exploring their relationships and the gender-based differences

Numerous studies have clarified that family socioeconomic status (SES) is positively associated with health. However, the mechanism of family SES on health needs to be further investigated from a social epidemiological perspective. This study aims to analyze the relationships among family SES, famil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC public health 2020-09, Vol.20 (1), p.1401-1401, Article 1401
Main Authors: Ji, Ying, Yun, Qingping, Jiang, Xuewen, Chang, Chun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Numerous studies have clarified that family socioeconomic status (SES) is positively associated with health. However, the mechanism of family SES on health needs to be further investigated from a social epidemiological perspective. This study aims to analyze the relationships among family SES, family social capital, and adult general health and tests whether gender-based differences exist in the relationship between family social capital and general health. A cross-sectional survey was used to collect data from 4187 representative households in six Chinese provinces. Family SES was conceptualized based on household income, family education, and family occupational status. Family social capital was measured by using family cohesion and health-related family support. General health was assessed by using five general health perception items of the Health Survey Short Form. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was applied to examine the relationships among family SES, family social capital, and general health, and a linear regression model was used to test gender-based differences. The SEM showed that the direct effects of family SES, family cohesion, and health-related family support on health were 0.08 (P 
ISSN:1471-2458
1471-2458
DOI:10.1186/s12889-020-09508-5