Loading…
Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study
We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method. Study performed at a single ter...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiology and oncology 2022-02, Vol.56 (1), p.37-45 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413 |
container_end_page | 45 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Radiology and oncology |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Cerovac, Anis Ljuca, Dzenita Arnautalic, Lejla Habek, Dubravko Bogdanovic, Gordana Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka Grgic, Gordana |
description | We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method.
Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (> 50%).
Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI < 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI > 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy.
We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2478/raon-2022-0005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cd1037735111455caa9b5d42a2a73010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cd1037735111455caa9b5d42a2a73010</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2628295221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl-P1CAUxRujcdfVVx8NiS--dC1QCqOJidmsuskmvuw7uQU6y6SFCu1s5iv6qbydGfeP8YkL_DgHDrco3tLqnNVSfUwQQ8kqxsqqqsSz4pQKRUvOKvn8UX1SvMp5g0DDmHpZnHBBa1XL6rT4fdl13oDZkdiRKUHIW1j7AD2Ze5zmOAdLti7lOZMB1sFN3pDkcgwQjCN-WOg16WIiY3JxdAkmv3UEcnY5Dy5Mi_Cwi4ObkkdZH7aQfQxYkBFZJDK589MtccEeqOjtwwSPmMUqfSKAFjGPzuwdTBxGOLrlaba718WLDvrs3hzHs-Lm2-XNxY_y-uf3q4uv16URvJlKZVvTUtYK6IxgneGrtllxJq0FJgCkMkpBbQyWbc2M4hgZp7JtoHGqpvysuDrI2ggbPSaMIO10BK_3CzGtNSRMqXfaWFpxKTFtSmshUHLVClszYCB5hXtnxZeD1ji3g7MGw0jQPxF9uhP8rV7HrVZK1UpwFPhwFEjx1-zypAefjet7CC7OWbOGKbYSjC33fv8Puolzwp_eUxKfJlYSqfMDZTDqnFx3fxla6aXj9NJxeuk4vXQcHnj3-An3-N8WQ-DzAbiDfnLJunWad1g82P9fWTSUS_4HfwPtjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627841597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Cerovac, Anis ; Ljuca, Dzenita ; Arnautalic, Lejla ; Habek, Dubravko ; Bogdanovic, Gordana ; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka ; Grgic, Gordana</creator><creatorcontrib>Cerovac, Anis ; Ljuca, Dzenita ; Arnautalic, Lejla ; Habek, Dubravko ; Bogdanovic, Gordana ; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka ; Grgic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method.
Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (> 50%).
Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI < 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI > 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy.
We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1581-3207</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1318-2099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1581-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0485-893X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/raon-2022-0005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35148470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cancer ; cancer staging ; Comparative studies ; Diagnostic systems ; Endometrial cancer ; endometrial neoplasms ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Endometrium ; Female ; Histopathology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical imaging ; Myometrium ; Myometrium - diagnostic imaging ; Myometrium - pathology ; Myometrium - surgery ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; oncology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; radiology ; Resonance ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Radiology and oncology, 2022-02, Vol.56 (1), p.37-45</ispartof><rights>2022 Anis Cerovac, Dzenita Ljuca, Lejla Arnautalic, Dubravko Habek, Gordana Bogdanovic, Jasminka Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Gordana Grgic, published by Sciendo.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Anis Cerovac, Dzenita Ljuca, Lejla Arnautalic, Dubravko Habek, Gordana Bogdanovic, Jasminka Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Gordana Grgic, published by Sciendo 2022 Anis Cerovac, Dzenita Ljuca, Lejla Arnautalic, Dubravko Habek, Gordana Bogdanovic, Jasminka Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Gordana Grgic, published by Sciendo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884853/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627841597?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35148470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cerovac, Anis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljuca, Dzenita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnautalic, Lejla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habek, Dubravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogdanovic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</title><title>Radiology and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiol Oncol</addtitle><description>We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method.
Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (> 50%).
Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI < 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI > 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy.
We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cancer staging</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>endometrial neoplasms</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Myometrium</subject><subject>Myometrium - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myometrium - pathology</subject><subject>Myometrium - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>radiology</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1581-3207</issn><issn>1318-2099</issn><issn>1581-3207</issn><issn>0485-893X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl-P1CAUxRujcdfVVx8NiS--dC1QCqOJidmsuskmvuw7uQU6y6SFCu1s5iv6qbydGfeP8YkL_DgHDrco3tLqnNVSfUwQQ8kqxsqqqsSz4pQKRUvOKvn8UX1SvMp5g0DDmHpZnHBBa1XL6rT4fdl13oDZkdiRKUHIW1j7AD2Ze5zmOAdLti7lOZMB1sFN3pDkcgwQjCN-WOg16WIiY3JxdAkmv3UEcnY5Dy5Mi_Cwi4ObkkdZH7aQfQxYkBFZJDK589MtccEeqOjtwwSPmMUqfSKAFjGPzuwdTBxGOLrlaba718WLDvrs3hzHs-Lm2-XNxY_y-uf3q4uv16URvJlKZVvTUtYK6IxgneGrtllxJq0FJgCkMkpBbQyWbc2M4hgZp7JtoHGqpvysuDrI2ggbPSaMIO10BK_3CzGtNSRMqXfaWFpxKTFtSmshUHLVClszYCB5hXtnxZeD1ji3g7MGw0jQPxF9uhP8rV7HrVZK1UpwFPhwFEjx1-zypAefjet7CC7OWbOGKbYSjC33fv8Puolzwp_eUxKfJlYSqfMDZTDqnFx3fxla6aXj9NJxeuk4vXQcHnj3-An3-N8WQ-DzAbiDfnLJunWad1g82P9fWTSUS_4HfwPtjA</recordid><startdate>20220211</startdate><enddate>20220211</enddate><creator>Cerovac, Anis</creator><creator>Ljuca, Dzenita</creator><creator>Arnautalic, Lejla</creator><creator>Habek, Dubravko</creator><creator>Bogdanovic, Gordana</creator><creator>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</creator><creator>Grgic, Gordana</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220211</creationdate><title>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</title><author>Cerovac, Anis ; Ljuca, Dzenita ; Arnautalic, Lejla ; Habek, Dubravko ; Bogdanovic, Gordana ; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka ; Grgic, Gordana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cancer staging</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>endometrial neoplasms</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Myometrium</topic><topic>Myometrium - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myometrium - pathology</topic><topic>Myometrium - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>radiology</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cerovac, Anis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljuca, Dzenita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnautalic, Lejla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habek, Dubravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogdanovic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Radiology and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cerovac, Anis</au><au>Ljuca, Dzenita</au><au>Arnautalic, Lejla</au><au>Habek, Dubravko</au><au>Bogdanovic, Gordana</au><au>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</au><au>Grgic, Gordana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Radiology and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiol Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-02-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>1581-3207</issn><issn>1318-2099</issn><eissn>1581-3207</eissn><eissn>0485-893X</eissn><abstract>We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS)
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method.
Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (> 50%).
Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI < 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI > 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy.
We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><pmid>35148470</pmid><doi>10.2478/raon-2022-0005</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1581-3207 |
ispartof | Radiology and oncology, 2022-02, Vol.56 (1), p.37-45 |
issn | 1581-3207 1318-2099 1581-3207 0485-893X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cd1037735111455caa9b5d42a2a73010 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Accuracy Cancer cancer staging Comparative studies Diagnostic systems Endometrial cancer endometrial neoplasms Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery Endometrium Female Histopathology Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mathematical analysis Medical imaging Myometrium Myometrium - diagnostic imaging Myometrium - pathology Myometrium - surgery Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology oncology Patients Prospective Studies radiology Resonance Sensitivity Sensitivity and Specificity Statistical analysis Surgery Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound |
title | Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20transvaginal%20ultrasound%20versus%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20for%20preoperative%20assessment%20of%20myometrial%20invasion%20in%20patients%20with%20endometrioid%20endometrial%20cancer:%20a%20prospective%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Radiology%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Cerovac,%20Anis&rft.date=2022-02-11&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=1581-3207&rft.eissn=1581-3207&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/raon-2022-0005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2628295221%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627841597&rft_id=info:pmid/35148470&rfr_iscdi=true |