Loading…

Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study

We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method. Study performed at a single ter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiology and oncology 2022-02, Vol.56 (1), p.37-45
Main Authors: Cerovac, Anis, Ljuca, Dzenita, Arnautalic, Lejla, Habek, Dubravko, Bogdanovic, Gordana, Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka, Grgic, Gordana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413
container_end_page 45
container_issue 1
container_start_page 37
container_title Radiology and oncology
container_volume 56
creator Cerovac, Anis
Ljuca, Dzenita
Arnautalic, Lejla
Habek, Dubravko
Bogdanovic, Gordana
Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka
Grgic, Gordana
description We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method. Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (> 50%). Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI < 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI > 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy. We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/raon-2022-0005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cd1037735111455caa9b5d42a2a73010</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cd1037735111455caa9b5d42a2a73010</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2628295221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl-P1CAUxRujcdfVVx8NiS--dC1QCqOJidmsuskmvuw7uQU6y6SFCu1s5iv6qbydGfeP8YkL_DgHDrco3tLqnNVSfUwQQ8kqxsqqqsSz4pQKRUvOKvn8UX1SvMp5g0DDmHpZnHBBa1XL6rT4fdl13oDZkdiRKUHIW1j7AD2Ze5zmOAdLti7lOZMB1sFN3pDkcgwQjCN-WOg16WIiY3JxdAkmv3UEcnY5Dy5Mi_Cwi4ObkkdZH7aQfQxYkBFZJDK589MtccEeqOjtwwSPmMUqfSKAFjGPzuwdTBxGOLrlaba718WLDvrs3hzHs-Lm2-XNxY_y-uf3q4uv16URvJlKZVvTUtYK6IxgneGrtllxJq0FJgCkMkpBbQyWbc2M4hgZp7JtoHGqpvysuDrI2ggbPSaMIO10BK_3CzGtNSRMqXfaWFpxKTFtSmshUHLVClszYCB5hXtnxZeD1ji3g7MGw0jQPxF9uhP8rV7HrVZK1UpwFPhwFEjx1-zypAefjet7CC7OWbOGKbYSjC33fv8Puolzwp_eUxKfJlYSqfMDZTDqnFx3fxla6aXj9NJxeuk4vXQcHnj3-An3-N8WQ-DzAbiDfnLJunWad1g82P9fWTSUS_4HfwPtjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2627841597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Cerovac, Anis ; Ljuca, Dzenita ; Arnautalic, Lejla ; Habek, Dubravko ; Bogdanovic, Gordana ; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka ; Grgic, Gordana</creator><creatorcontrib>Cerovac, Anis ; Ljuca, Dzenita ; Arnautalic, Lejla ; Habek, Dubravko ; Bogdanovic, Gordana ; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka ; Grgic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method. Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (&gt; 50%). Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI &lt; 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI &gt; 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy. We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1581-3207</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1318-2099</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1581-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0485-893X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/raon-2022-0005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 35148470</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Poland: Sciendo</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cancer ; cancer staging ; Comparative studies ; Diagnostic systems ; Endometrial cancer ; endometrial neoplasms ; Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery ; Endometrium ; Female ; Histopathology ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical imaging ; Myometrium ; Myometrium - diagnostic imaging ; Myometrium - pathology ; Myometrium - surgery ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; oncology ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; radiology ; Resonance ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Radiology and oncology, 2022-02, Vol.56 (1), p.37-45</ispartof><rights>2022 Anis Cerovac, Dzenita Ljuca, Lejla Arnautalic, Dubravko Habek, Gordana Bogdanovic, Jasminka Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Gordana Grgic, published by Sciendo.</rights><rights>2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2022 Anis Cerovac, Dzenita Ljuca, Lejla Arnautalic, Dubravko Habek, Gordana Bogdanovic, Jasminka Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Gordana Grgic, published by Sciendo 2022 Anis Cerovac, Dzenita Ljuca, Lejla Arnautalic, Dubravko Habek, Gordana Bogdanovic, Jasminka Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Gordana Grgic, published by Sciendo</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8884853/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2627841597?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35148470$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cerovac, Anis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljuca, Dzenita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnautalic, Lejla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habek, Dubravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogdanovic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</title><title>Radiology and oncology</title><addtitle>Radiol Oncol</addtitle><description>We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method. Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (&gt; 50%). Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI &lt; 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI &gt; 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy. We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cancer staging</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Endometrial cancer</subject><subject>endometrial neoplasms</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrium</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Myometrium</subject><subject>Myometrium - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Myometrium - pathology</subject><subject>Myometrium - surgery</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>oncology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>radiology</subject><subject>Resonance</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>1581-3207</issn><issn>1318-2099</issn><issn>1581-3207</issn><issn>0485-893X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl-P1CAUxRujcdfVVx8NiS--dC1QCqOJidmsuskmvuw7uQU6y6SFCu1s5iv6qbydGfeP8YkL_DgHDrco3tLqnNVSfUwQQ8kqxsqqqsSz4pQKRUvOKvn8UX1SvMp5g0DDmHpZnHBBa1XL6rT4fdl13oDZkdiRKUHIW1j7AD2Ze5zmOAdLti7lOZMB1sFN3pDkcgwQjCN-WOg16WIiY3JxdAkmv3UEcnY5Dy5Mi_Cwi4ObkkdZH7aQfQxYkBFZJDK589MtccEeqOjtwwSPmMUqfSKAFjGPzuwdTBxGOLrlaba718WLDvrs3hzHs-Lm2-XNxY_y-uf3q4uv16URvJlKZVvTUtYK6IxgneGrtllxJq0FJgCkMkpBbQyWbc2M4hgZp7JtoHGqpvysuDrI2ggbPSaMIO10BK_3CzGtNSRMqXfaWFpxKTFtSmshUHLVClszYCB5hXtnxZeD1ji3g7MGw0jQPxF9uhP8rV7HrVZK1UpwFPhwFEjx1-zypAefjet7CC7OWbOGKbYSjC33fv8Puolzwp_eUxKfJlYSqfMDZTDqnFx3fxla6aXj9NJxeuk4vXQcHnj3-An3-N8WQ-DzAbiDfnLJunWad1g82P9fWTSUS_4HfwPtjA</recordid><startdate>20220211</startdate><enddate>20220211</enddate><creator>Cerovac, Anis</creator><creator>Ljuca, Dzenita</creator><creator>Arnautalic, Lejla</creator><creator>Habek, Dubravko</creator><creator>Bogdanovic, Gordana</creator><creator>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</creator><creator>Grgic, Gordana</creator><general>Sciendo</general><general>De Gruyter Poland</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220211</creationdate><title>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</title><author>Cerovac, Anis ; Ljuca, Dzenita ; Arnautalic, Lejla ; Habek, Dubravko ; Bogdanovic, Gordana ; Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka ; Grgic, Gordana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cancer staging</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Endometrial cancer</topic><topic>endometrial neoplasms</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrium</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Myometrium</topic><topic>Myometrium - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Myometrium - pathology</topic><topic>Myometrium - surgery</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>oncology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>radiology</topic><topic>Resonance</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cerovac, Anis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ljuca, Dzenita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arnautalic, Lejla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habek, Dubravko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogdanovic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gordana</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Radiology and oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cerovac, Anis</au><au>Ljuca, Dzenita</au><au>Arnautalic, Lejla</au><au>Habek, Dubravko</au><au>Bogdanovic, Gordana</au><au>Mustedanagic-Mujanovic, Jasminka</au><au>Grgic, Gordana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Radiology and oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Radiol Oncol</addtitle><date>2022-02-11</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>45</epage><pages>37-45</pages><issn>1581-3207</issn><issn>1318-2099</issn><eissn>1581-3207</eissn><eissn>0485-893X</eissn><abstract>We compared the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myometrial invasion (MI) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), while definitive histopathological diagnosis served as a reference method. Study performed at a single tertiary centre from 2019 to 2021, included women with a histopathological proven EC, hospitalized for scheduled surgery. TVUS and MRI were performed prior to surgical staging for assessment MI, which was estimated using two objective TVUS methods (Gordon's and Karlsson's) and MRI. Patients were divided into two groups, after surgery and histopathological assessment of MI: superficial (≤ 50%) and deep (&gt; 50%). Sixty patients were eligible for the study. According to the reference method, there were 34 (56.7%) cases in the study with MI &lt; 50%, and 26 (43.3%) with MI &gt; 50%. Both objective TVUS methods and MRI showed no statistical significant differences in overall diagnostic performance for the preoperative assessment of MI. The concordance coefficient between both TVUS methods, MRI and histopathology was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.001). Gordon's method calculating MI reached a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 83%, 77% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 83% overall accuracy. Karlsson's method reached PPV of 82%, NPV of 79%, 69% sensitivity, 88% specificity, and 80% overall accuracy. Accordingly, MRI calculating MI reached PPV of 83%, NPV of 97%, 97% sensitivity, 85% specificity, and 90% overall accuracy. We found that objective TVUS assessment of myometrial invasion was performed with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of MRI in women with endometrial cancer.</abstract><cop>Poland</cop><pub>Sciendo</pub><pmid>35148470</pmid><doi>10.2478/raon-2022-0005</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1581-3207
ispartof Radiology and oncology, 2022-02, Vol.56 (1), p.37-45
issn 1581-3207
1318-2099
1581-3207
0485-893X
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cd1037735111455caa9b5d42a2a73010
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Accuracy
Cancer
cancer staging
Comparative studies
Diagnostic systems
Endometrial cancer
endometrial neoplasms
Endometrial Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Endometrial Neoplasms - surgery
Endometrium
Female
Histopathology
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Mathematical analysis
Medical imaging
Myometrium
Myometrium - diagnostic imaging
Myometrium - pathology
Myometrium - surgery
Neoplasm Invasiveness - diagnostic imaging
Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology
oncology
Patients
Prospective Studies
radiology
Resonance
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Statistical analysis
Surgery
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
title Efficacy of transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: a prospective comparative study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20transvaginal%20ultrasound%20versus%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20for%20preoperative%20assessment%20of%20myometrial%20invasion%20in%20patients%20with%20endometrioid%20endometrial%20cancer:%20a%20prospective%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Radiology%20and%20oncology&rft.au=Cerovac,%20Anis&rft.date=2022-02-11&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=45&rft.pages=37-45&rft.issn=1581-3207&rft.eissn=1581-3207&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/raon-2022-0005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2628295221%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-8dbcb12b5afc52fc39b69327dda25aa78c88a4ccaa7b42c83228317b6a6e8413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2627841597&rft_id=info:pmid/35148470&rfr_iscdi=true