Relationship among malocclusion, number of occlusal pairs and mastication

• Published in: Brazilian oral research 2010-12, Vol.24 (4), p.419-424
• Main Authors: Rios-Vera, Vanesa, Sánchez-Ayala, Alfonso, Senna, Plínio Mendes, Watanabe-Kanno, Gustavo, Cury, Altair Antoninha Del Bel, Garcia, Renata Cunha Matheus Rodrigues
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Analysis of Variance; Chi-Square Distribution; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dental Occlusion; Dentistry; DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE; Female; Humans; Male; Malocclusion; Malocclusion - classification; Malocclusion - physiopathology; Mastication; Mastication - physiology; Particle Size; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1806-8324; 1807-3107; 1807-3107; 1806-8324
• DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000400008

This study evaluated the relationship among malocclusion, number of occlusal pairs, masticatory performance, masticatory time and masticatory ability in completely dentate subjects. Eighty healthy subjects (mean age = 19.40 ± 4.14 years) were grouped according to malocclusion diagnosis (n = 16): Class I, Class Class II-2, Class III and Normocclusion (control). Number of occlusal pairs was determined clinically. Masticatory performance was evaluated by the sieving method, and the time used for the comminute test food was registered as the masticatory time. Masticatory ability was measured by a dichotomic self-perception questionnaire. Statistical analysis was done by one-way ANOVA, ANOVA on ranks, Chi-Square and Spearman tests. Class II-1 and III malocclusion groups presented a smaller number of occlusal pairs than Normocclusion (p < 0.0001), Class I (p < 0.001) and II-2 (p < 0.0001) malocclusion groups. Class I, and III malocclusion groups showed lower masticatory performance values compared to Normocclusion (p < 0.05) and Class II-2 (p < 0.05) malocclusion groups. There were no differences in masticatory time (p = 0.156) and ability (χ² = 3.58/p= 0.465) among groups. Occlusal pairs were associated with malocclusion (rho = 0.444/p < 0.0001) and masticatory performance (rho = 0.393/p < 0.0001), but malocclusion was not correlated with masticatory performance (rho = 0.116/p= 0.306). In conclusion, masticatory performance and ability were not related to malocclusion, and subjects with Class I, II-1 and III malocclusions presented lower masticatory performance because of their smaller number of occlusal pairs.