Clinical Efficacy of Biomimetic Bioactive Biomaterials for Dental Pulp Capping: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

• Published in: Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) Switzerland), 2022-11, Vol.7 (4), p.211
• Main Authors: Argueta-Figueroa, Liliana, Jurado, Carlos Alberto, Torres-Rosas, Rafael, Bautista-Hernández, Mario Alberto, Alhotan, Abdulaziz, Nurrohman, Hamid
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Bias; Biomaterials; Biomedical materials; clinical success; Clinical trials; Dental pulp; Dentin; dentin increment; Dentists; Meta-analysis; Observational studies; Pain; permanent teeth; primary teeth; Properties; resin-modified pulp capping biomaterials; Review; Software; Success; Systematic review; Teeth; TheraCal LC
• ISSN: 2313-7673; 2313-7673
• DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7040211

Recently, biomimetic bioactive biomaterials have been introduced to the market for dental pulp capping. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine any variation between the effect of using TheraCal LC and other bioactive biomaterials for pulp capping is different, as measured by dentin increment and clinical success. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Newcastle−Ottawa tools for randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A search for relevant articles was performed on five databases. Additionally, the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A summary of individual studies and a meta-analysis were performed. The odds ratio of data from clinical success was combined using a random-effects meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed homogeneity between the studies (I2 = 0%). They revealed that the clinical success showed no differences between the patients who received TheraCal LC, light-cured calcium silicate-based biomimetic biomaterial, for dental pulp capping or the comparator biomaterials (p > 0.5). However, the certainty of the evidence was low to moderate due to the risk of bias in the included studies.