Obstetric interventions' effects on the birthing experience

• Published in: BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2024-07, Vol.24 (1), p.508-8, Article 508
• Main Authors: Volkert, Anna, Bach, Lisa, Hagenbeck, Carsten, Kössendrup, Jan, Oberröhrmann, Charlotte, Okumu, Mi-Ran, Scholten, Nadine
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Birth experience; Birth interventions; Cesarean section; Cesarean Section - statistics & numerical data; Childbirth & labor; Cross-Sectional Studies; Decision making; Delivery, Obstetric - methods; Delivery, Obstetric - psychology; Episiotomy; Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data; Female; Fetuses; Fundal pressure; Germany; Health insurance companies; Humans; Influence; Instrumental delivery; Maternal child nursing; Mothers; Mothers - psychology; Obstetrics; Participation; Parturition - psychology; Patient Satisfaction; Pregnancy; Questionnaires; Surveys and Questionnaires; Vagina; Variables; Well being; Young Adult
• ISSN: 1471-2393; 1471-2393
• DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06626-5

The birth experience plays a pivotal role in the mother´s mental well-being and has a crucial effect on the mother-child bond. Unanticipated medical interventions, including fundal pressure, episiotomy, assisted vaginal delivery (AVD), or unplanned cesarean section (CS) during labor, may adversely affect the birth experience. The objective of this study is to identify factors contributing to the diminished evaluation of the birth experience after assessing the prevalence of unplanned obstetrical interventions in Germany. For this cross-sectional analysis, 4000 mothers whose children were born 8 or 12 months before were asked about their birth experience via a paper-based questionnaire. Overall 1102 mothers participated in the study, representing a response rate of 27.6%. The revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ2) was used to measure the childbirth experience. In addition to descriptive and bivariate analyses using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Kruskal-Wallis-test, we calculated multivariate linear regression models for each dimension of the CEQ2. In general, the participants evaluated their childbirth experience favorably, assigning an average rating of 3.09 on a scale ranging from 1 to 4. Women who experienced fundal pressure, an AVD, or an unplanned CS rated their birth experience significantly worse compared to women who gave birth without interventions. Unplanned CSs received the lowest ratings for "personal capability" and "perceived safety," and an AVD resulted in lower scores for "professional support" and "participation." However, the interventions we studied did not account for much of the variation in how the childbirth experience plays out for different individuals. Obstetric interventions have a significant effect on different dimensions of the birth experience. If a high level of birth satisfaction is to be achieved, it is important to know which dimension of satisfaction is affected by the intervention so that explicit measures, like fostering communication, participation or safety can be taken to promote improvement. DRKS00029214, retrospectively registered (Registration Date 22.06.2023).