Loading…
Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19
The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones si...
Saved in:
Published in: | Urology annals 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.104-107 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053 |
container_end_page | 107 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 104 |
container_title | Urology annals |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Ibrahim, Rabie M Elzawy, Faysal Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed Elmarakbi, Akram A Sayed, Osama Lotfy, Amr M Youssef, Ahmed Badwy, Hany F Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal |
description | The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.
Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size 11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m
were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1
300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.
Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1
session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2
session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).
SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ua.ua_42_22 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cfc39af2d11545c0a1f27b6e90c941d2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A788341309</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cfc39af2d11545c0a1f27b6e90c941d2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A788341309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1r3DAQhk1paNK0p96LoVAKZbczkixbpxK2H1kI5NCPqxjL8lpbr7WR7JT8-yrdbJotpeggMXrmHWbmzbIXCHOBwN9NNJ9IC6YZe5SdgCrFrKy4eLx_l0oeZ09jXANIKUE8yY55JbBgHE6y2ZfOmx_5T7q2ee_Gzo_BbeNN7oZ87GxuA-W-zReX35cfZqieZUct9dE-v7tPs2-fPn5dnM8uLj8vF2cXM1NIGBNYNHWNxgKW1HIjkcu6ZLW0glsCRQ02pq4qxmrTAlLTVIpZRSgLqAgKfpotd7qNp7XeBrehcKM9Of074MNKUxid6a02reGKWtYgFqIwQNiyMlVSYJTAhiWt9zut7VRvbGPsMAbqD0QPfwbX6ZW_1giVkpxjUnhzpxD81WTjqDcuGtv3NFg_Rc0UZ6kWCJHQV3-haz-FIc1Kc0QUqsKi-i8FXIEUopR_qBWlPt3Qpt2QuS2tz8oqbRg5qETN_0Gl09iNM36wrUvxg4TXDxI6S_3YRd9Po_NDPATf7kATfIzBtvczQ9C3ztPJdnvnJfrlwzHfs3ur8V_UnM8a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039064476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Ibrahim, Rabie M ; Elzawy, Faysal ; Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed ; Elmarakbi, Akram A ; Sayed, Osama ; Lotfy, Amr M ; Youssef, Ahmed ; Badwy, Hany F ; Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabie M ; Elzawy, Faysal ; Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed ; Elmarakbi, Akram A ; Sayed, Osama ; Lotfy, Amr M ; Youssef, Ahmed ; Badwy, Hany F ; Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.
Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m
were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1
300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.
Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1
session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2
session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).
SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-7796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-7834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_42_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38415230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; COVID-19 ; Kidney stones ; Lithotripsy ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Nalbuphine ; Original ; Pandemics ; Patient safety ; renal stones ; shock wave lithotripsy ; Success ; Surgical outcomes ; Ultrasonic imaging ; upper urinary tract stones</subject><ispartof>Urology annals, 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.104-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Urology Annals.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Urology Annals 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896331/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3039064476?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38415230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzawy, Faysal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmarakbi, Akram A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfy, Amr M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badwy, Hany F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creatorcontrib><title>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</title><title>Urology annals</title><addtitle>Urol Ann</addtitle><description>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.
Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m
were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1
300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.
Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1
session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2
session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).
SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Nalbuphine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>renal stones</subject><subject>shock wave lithotripsy</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>upper urinary tract stones</subject><issn>0974-7796</issn><issn>0974-7834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1r3DAQhk1paNK0p96LoVAKZbczkixbpxK2H1kI5NCPqxjL8lpbr7WR7JT8-yrdbJotpeggMXrmHWbmzbIXCHOBwN9NNJ9IC6YZe5SdgCrFrKy4eLx_l0oeZ09jXANIKUE8yY55JbBgHE6y2ZfOmx_5T7q2ee_Gzo_BbeNN7oZ87GxuA-W-zReX35cfZqieZUct9dE-v7tPs2-fPn5dnM8uLj8vF2cXM1NIGBNYNHWNxgKW1HIjkcu6ZLW0glsCRQ02pq4qxmrTAlLTVIpZRSgLqAgKfpotd7qNp7XeBrehcKM9Of074MNKUxid6a02reGKWtYgFqIwQNiyMlVSYJTAhiWt9zut7VRvbGPsMAbqD0QPfwbX6ZW_1giVkpxjUnhzpxD81WTjqDcuGtv3NFg_Rc0UZ6kWCJHQV3-haz-FIc1Kc0QUqsKi-i8FXIEUopR_qBWlPt3Qpt2QuS2tz8oqbRg5qETN_0Gl09iNM36wrUvxg4TXDxI6S_3YRd9Po_NDPATf7kATfIzBtvczQ9C3ztPJdnvnJfrlwzHfs3ur8V_UnM8a</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Ibrahim, Rabie M</creator><creator>Elzawy, Faysal</creator><creator>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</creator><creator>Elmarakbi, Akram A</creator><creator>Sayed, Osama</creator><creator>Lotfy, Amr M</creator><creator>Youssef, Ahmed</creator><creator>Badwy, Hany F</creator><creator>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</title><author>Ibrahim, Rabie M ; Elzawy, Faysal ; Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed ; Elmarakbi, Akram A ; Sayed, Osama ; Lotfy, Amr M ; Youssef, Ahmed ; Badwy, Hany F ; Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Nalbuphine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>renal stones</topic><topic>shock wave lithotripsy</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>upper urinary tract stones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzawy, Faysal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmarakbi, Akram A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfy, Amr M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badwy, Hany F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Health & Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Urology annals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibrahim, Rabie M</au><au>Elzawy, Faysal</au><au>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</au><au>Elmarakbi, Akram A</au><au>Sayed, Osama</au><au>Lotfy, Amr M</au><au>Youssef, Ahmed</au><au>Badwy, Hany F</au><au>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Urology annals</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Ann</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>104-107</pages><issn>0974-7796</issn><eissn>0974-7834</eissn><abstract>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic.
Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size <2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance >11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m
were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1
300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded.
Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1
session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2
session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2).
SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>38415230</pmid><doi>10.4103/ua.ua_42_22</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0974-7796 |
ispartof | Urology annals, 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.104-107 |
issn | 0974-7796 0974-7834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cfc39af2d11545c0a1f27b6e90c941d2 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database |
subjects | Body mass index COVID-19 Kidney stones Lithotripsy Medical research Medicine, Experimental Nalbuphine Original Pandemics Patient safety renal stones shock wave lithotripsy Success Surgical outcomes Ultrasonic imaging upper urinary tract stones |
title | Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19 |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A15%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shock%20wave%20lithotripsy%20in%20the%20era%20of%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Urology%20annals&rft.au=Ibrahim,%20Rabie%20M&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=104-107&rft.issn=0974-7796&rft.eissn=0974-7834&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ua.ua_42_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA788341309%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039064476&rft_id=info:pmid/38415230&rft_galeid=A788341309&rfr_iscdi=true |