Loading…

Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19

The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones si...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urology annals 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.104-107
Main Authors: Ibrahim, Rabie M, Elzawy, Faysal, Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed, Elmarakbi, Akram A, Sayed, Osama, Lotfy, Amr M, Youssef, Ahmed, Badwy, Hany F, Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053
container_end_page 107
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title Urology annals
container_volume 16
creator Ibrahim, Rabie M
Elzawy, Faysal
Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed
Elmarakbi, Akram A
Sayed, Osama
Lotfy, Amr M
Youssef, Ahmed
Badwy, Hany F
Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal
description The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size 11 cm, and body mass index >30 kg/m were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded. Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1 session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2 session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2). SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/ua.ua_42_22
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cfc39af2d11545c0a1f27b6e90c941d2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A788341309</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_cfc39af2d11545c0a1f27b6e90c941d2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A788341309</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1r3DAQhk1paNK0p96LoVAKZbczkixbpxK2H1kI5NCPqxjL8lpbr7WR7JT8-yrdbJotpeggMXrmHWbmzbIXCHOBwN9NNJ9IC6YZe5SdgCrFrKy4eLx_l0oeZ09jXANIKUE8yY55JbBgHE6y2ZfOmx_5T7q2ee_Gzo_BbeNN7oZ87GxuA-W-zReX35cfZqieZUct9dE-v7tPs2-fPn5dnM8uLj8vF2cXM1NIGBNYNHWNxgKW1HIjkcu6ZLW0glsCRQ02pq4qxmrTAlLTVIpZRSgLqAgKfpotd7qNp7XeBrehcKM9Of074MNKUxid6a02reGKWtYgFqIwQNiyMlVSYJTAhiWt9zut7VRvbGPsMAbqD0QPfwbX6ZW_1giVkpxjUnhzpxD81WTjqDcuGtv3NFg_Rc0UZ6kWCJHQV3-haz-FIc1Kc0QUqsKi-i8FXIEUopR_qBWlPt3Qpt2QuS2tz8oqbRg5qETN_0Gl09iNM36wrUvxg4TXDxI6S_3YRd9Po_NDPATf7kATfIzBtvczQ9C3ztPJdnvnJfrlwzHfs3ur8V_UnM8a</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039064476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Coronavirus Research Database</source><creator>Ibrahim, Rabie M ; Elzawy, Faysal ; Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed ; Elmarakbi, Akram A ; Sayed, Osama ; Lotfy, Amr M ; Youssef, Ahmed ; Badwy, Hany F ; Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creator><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabie M ; Elzawy, Faysal ; Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed ; Elmarakbi, Akram A ; Sayed, Osama ; Lotfy, Amr M ; Youssef, Ahmed ; Badwy, Hany F ; Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size &lt;2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance &gt;11 cm, and body mass index &gt;30 kg/m were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded. Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1 session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2 session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2). SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-7796</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-7834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ua.ua_42_22</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38415230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Body mass index ; COVID-19 ; Kidney stones ; Lithotripsy ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Nalbuphine ; Original ; Pandemics ; Patient safety ; renal stones ; shock wave lithotripsy ; Success ; Surgical outcomes ; Ultrasonic imaging ; upper urinary tract stones</subject><ispartof>Urology annals, 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.104-107</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Urology Annals.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Urology Annals 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10896331/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3039064476?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,38516,43895,44590,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38415230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzawy, Faysal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmarakbi, Akram A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfy, Amr M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badwy, Hany F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creatorcontrib><title>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</title><title>Urology annals</title><addtitle>Urol Ann</addtitle><description>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size &lt;2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance &gt;11 cm, and body mass index &gt;30 kg/m were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded. Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1 session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2 session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2). SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</description><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Lithotripsy</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Nalbuphine</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>renal stones</subject><subject>shock wave lithotripsy</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>upper urinary tract stones</subject><issn>0974-7796</issn><issn>0974-7834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>COVID</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1r3DAQhk1paNK0p96LoVAKZbczkixbpxK2H1kI5NCPqxjL8lpbr7WR7JT8-yrdbJotpeggMXrmHWbmzbIXCHOBwN9NNJ9IC6YZe5SdgCrFrKy4eLx_l0oeZ09jXANIKUE8yY55JbBgHE6y2ZfOmx_5T7q2ee_Gzo_BbeNN7oZ87GxuA-W-zReX35cfZqieZUct9dE-v7tPs2-fPn5dnM8uLj8vF2cXM1NIGBNYNHWNxgKW1HIjkcu6ZLW0glsCRQ02pq4qxmrTAlLTVIpZRSgLqAgKfpotd7qNp7XeBrehcKM9Of074MNKUxid6a02reGKWtYgFqIwQNiyMlVSYJTAhiWt9zut7VRvbGPsMAbqD0QPfwbX6ZW_1giVkpxjUnhzpxD81WTjqDcuGtv3NFg_Rc0UZ6kWCJHQV3-haz-FIc1Kc0QUqsKi-i8FXIEUopR_qBWlPt3Qpt2QuS2tz8oqbRg5qETN_0Gl09iNM36wrUvxg4TXDxI6S_3YRd9Po_NDPATf7kATfIzBtvczQ9C3ztPJdnvnJfrlwzHfs3ur8V_UnM8a</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Ibrahim, Rabie M</creator><creator>Elzawy, Faysal</creator><creator>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</creator><creator>Elmarakbi, Akram A</creator><creator>Sayed, Osama</creator><creator>Lotfy, Amr M</creator><creator>Youssef, Ahmed</creator><creator>Badwy, Hany F</creator><creator>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications &amp; Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Wolters Kluwer - Medknow</general><general>Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</title><author>Ibrahim, Rabie M ; Elzawy, Faysal ; Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed ; Elmarakbi, Akram A ; Sayed, Osama ; Lotfy, Amr M ; Youssef, Ahmed ; Badwy, Hany F ; Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Lithotripsy</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Nalbuphine</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>renal stones</topic><topic>shock wave lithotripsy</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>upper urinary tract stones</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ibrahim, Rabie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzawy, Faysal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmarakbi, Akram A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayed, Osama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfy, Amr M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Youssef, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badwy, Hany F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Health &amp; Medical Complete</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Urology annals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ibrahim, Rabie M</au><au>Elzawy, Faysal</au><au>Ragheb, Ahmed Mohamed</au><au>Elmarakbi, Akram A</au><au>Sayed, Osama</au><au>Lotfy, Amr M</au><au>Youssef, Ahmed</au><au>Badwy, Hany F</au><au>Mohamed, Ahmed Gamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Urology annals</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Ann</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>107</epage><pages>104-107</pages><issn>0974-7796</issn><eissn>0974-7834</eissn><abstract>The objective of the study y was to evaluate factors which can improve shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) results to keep up with COVID-19 pandemic. Between June 2020 and June 2021, patients with radio-opaque or faint radio-opaque upper urinary tract stones, stone attenuation value ≤1200 HU, and stones size &lt;2.5 cm were treated by electrohydraulic SWL. Patients with respiratory tract symptoms elevated temperature, contact with COVID-19 patients, or positive COVID-19 swab 2 weeks preoperatively, skin-to-stone distance &gt;11 cm, and body mass index &gt;30 kg/m were excluded from the study. Patients were prospectively enrolled in SWL done at a rate of 40-50 SWs/min under combined ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided, ramped into high power in the 1 300 shocks. Success rate and complications were recorded. Five hundred and ninety patients completed the study. The success rate after 1 session was 408/590 patients (69.15%) which was augmented by 2 session to reach 527/590 patients 89.3%. The success rate was 96.2% at 3 months postoperatively. Most complications were mild (Grade 1 or 2). SWL results improved using slow rate high power from the start of the session under combined fluoroscopy and ultrasound guidance. SWL may be a preferred option during a pandemic.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>38415230</pmid><doi>10.4103/ua.ua_42_22</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-7796
ispartof Urology annals, 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.104-107
issn 0974-7796
0974-7834
language eng
recordid cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_cfc39af2d11545c0a1f27b6e90c941d2
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest); PubMed Central; Coronavirus Research Database
subjects Body mass index
COVID-19
Kidney stones
Lithotripsy
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Nalbuphine
Original
Pandemics
Patient safety
renal stones
shock wave lithotripsy
Success
Surgical outcomes
Ultrasonic imaging
upper urinary tract stones
title Shock wave lithotripsy in the era of COVID-19
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A15%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shock%20wave%20lithotripsy%20in%20the%20era%20of%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Urology%20annals&rft.au=Ibrahim,%20Rabie%20M&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=107&rft.pages=104-107&rft.issn=0974-7796&rft.eissn=0974-7834&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ua.ua_42_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA788341309%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c560t-195dbb1ce017af3c6136b72b6e43ea09ad1dcb8822bcf01add892e9a16508a053%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039064476&rft_id=info:pmid/38415230&rft_galeid=A788341309&rfr_iscdi=true