Effectiveness of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication-related problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

• Published in: BMC health services research 2020-01, Vol.20 (1), p.39-39, Article 39
• Main Authors: Abbott, Rebecca A, Moore, Darren A, Rogers, Morwenna, Bethel, Alison, Stein, Ken, Coon, Jo Thompson
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Bias; Community; Drug dosages; Drug stores; Drug therapy; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions - prevention & control; Elderly; Evaluation; Future predictions; Health services; Health Services Research; Home health care; Home visit; Home visits; Hospital admission; Hospital admission and discharge; Hospitals; House Calls; Humans; Intervention; Management; Medical care quality; Medical research; Medication review; Meta-analysis; Mortality; Narratives; Nursing homes; Older adults; Older people; Patient compliance; Patients; Pharmaceuticals; Pharmacist intervention; Pharmacists; Polypharmacy; Practice; Quality of life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Setting (Literature); Social aspects; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1472-6963; 1472-6963
• DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4728-3

Medication mismanagement is a major cause of both hospital admission and nursing home placement of frail older adults. Medication reviews by community pharmacists aim to maximise therapeutic benefit but also minimise harm. Pharmacist-led medication reviews have been the focus of several systematic reviews, but none have focussed on the home setting. To determine the effectiveness of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication-related problems we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Thirteen databases were searched from inception to December 2018. Forward and backward citation of included studies was also performed. Articles were screened for inclusion independently by two reviewers. Randomised controlled studies of home visits by pharmacists for individuals at risk of medication-related problems were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction and quality appraisal were performed by one reviewer and checked by a second. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed where sufficient data allowed and narrative synthesis summarised all remaining data. Twelve RCTs (reported in 15 articles), involving 3410 participants, were included in the review. The frequency, content and purpose of the home visit varied considerably. The data from eight trials were suitable for meta-analysis of the effects on hospital admissions and mortality, and from three trials for the effects on quality of life. Overall there was no evidence of reduction in hospital admissions (risk ratio (RR) of 1.01 (95%CI 0.86 to 1.20, I  = 69.0%, p = 0.89; 8 studies, 2314 participants)), or mortality (RR of 1.01 (95%CI 0.81 to 1.26, I  = 0%, p = 0.94; 8 studies, 2314 participants)). There was no consistent evidence of an effect on quality of life, medication adherence or knowledge. A systematic review of twelve RCTs assessing the impact of pharmacist home visits for individuals at risk of medication related problems found no evidence of effect on hospital admission or mortality rates, and limited evidence of effect on quality of life. Future studies should focus on using more robust methods to assess relevant outcomes.