Loading…
Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability
Organic farming has been regarded as an alternative solution for both agricultural sustainability and human health maintenance. Few researches have concentrated on the differences of biodiversity and eco-economic benefits between organic and conventional orchards. Organic management (OM) of orchards...
Saved in:
Published in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2016-06, Vol.4, p.e2137-e2137, Article e2137 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413 |
container_end_page | e2137 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e2137 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Meng, Jie Li, Lijun Liu, Haitao Li, Yong Li, Caihong Wu, Guanglei Yu, Xiaofan Guo, Liyue Cheng, Da Muminov, Mahmud A Liang, Xiaotian Jiang, Gaoming |
description | Organic farming has been regarded as an alternative solution for both agricultural sustainability and human health maintenance. Few researches have concentrated on the differences of biodiversity and eco-economic benefits between organic and conventional orchards. Organic management (OM) of orchards mainly includes taking advantage of natural enemies and beneficial weeds as well as soil organisms and controlling harmful pests. Here we conducted a three-year experiment on the effects of managing biodiversity in an organic apple orchard, using cattle manure to enrich soil biota, propagating native plant to suppress weeds and applying ecological pest management to control pests. The effect was assessed against the conventional management (CM) model. We found that OM enhanced soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. The 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing results indicated that the dominant bacterial phyla of the top soil were Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and OM had richer bacteria diversity with a 7% higher Shannon's index than the CM. In particular, the relative abundance of rhizobium in the OM was higher than that of the CM. For OM, Duchesnea indica was an ideal ground-cover plant to control weeds through winning the niche competition and thus decreased weeds' Simpson, Shannon-Wiener and Pielou index by 38.2%, 53.8% and 16.9% separately. The phototactic pests' weight and scarab beetle's population were effectively decreased by 35% and 86% respectively through long time control and prevention. OM had an average of 20 times more earthworms than CM, and the maximum density had reached 369 m(-2) (0-20 cm soil). The dominant earthworm species of the OM were detritivores which preferring soil with high organic matter content. Due to no synthetic chemicals being used, the OM produced much safer apple fruits which were sold at high prices. Economically, up to a 103% increase of output-input ratio had been achieved in the OM. Our study clearly demonstrated that biodiversity management without chemical pollution increased the biodiversity of beneficial organisms, reduced antagonists of the fruit tree, and enhanced economic benefits of the apple orchard. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.2137 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d0cc05c7ab034332bacae3e40ea63400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A543361320</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d0cc05c7ab034332bacae3e40ea63400</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A543361320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkt9rFDEQxxdRbKl98Q-QBUFEuDO_Ntl9EWrRWij4oq-G2WT2Nsducia7hf73ZnttvROThySTz3wzM5mieE3JWimqPu4Q43bNKFfPilNGpVrVvGqeH-xPivOUtiSPmklS85fFCVNcSin4afHrswvW3WJMbrorR_CwwRH9VIauDHED3pm8mh6iLdH34A2msg1TX6IJQ9g4A0MJ3i5HH8ZM72Lo3AStG7Liq-JFB0PC84f1rPj59cuPy2-rm-9X15cXNysjlZpWjZBoUKCgtWXEQkVFQ5WRtbUAyFqsODVVbQGJZQ3BGlRXMVIx1TZt9uJnxfVe1wbY6l10I8Q7HcDpe0POREOcnBlQW2IMqYyClnDBOWvBAHIUBEFyQUjW-rTX2s3tiNbkakQYjkSPb7zr9SbcatGwHMoSzPsHgRh-z5gmPbpkcBjAY5iTpjWhgimpFvTtP-g2zNHnUmnaVLxpKiXIX2oDOQHnu5DfNYuovqhyDpJytlDr_1B5Wsz_Ejx2LtuPHN4dOPQIw9SnMMyTCz4dgx_2oIkhpYjdUzEo0UsX6vsu1EsXZvjNYfme0Mee438AKYTXzQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1953995740</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Meng, Jie ; Li, Lijun ; Liu, Haitao ; Li, Yong ; Li, Caihong ; Wu, Guanglei ; Yu, Xiaofan ; Guo, Liyue ; Cheng, Da ; Muminov, Mahmud A ; Liang, Xiaotian ; Jiang, Gaoming</creator><creatorcontrib>Meng, Jie ; Li, Lijun ; Liu, Haitao ; Li, Yong ; Li, Caihong ; Wu, Guanglei ; Yu, Xiaofan ; Guo, Liyue ; Cheng, Da ; Muminov, Mahmud A ; Liang, Xiaotian ; Jiang, Gaoming</creatorcontrib><description>Organic farming has been regarded as an alternative solution for both agricultural sustainability and human health maintenance. Few researches have concentrated on the differences of biodiversity and eco-economic benefits between organic and conventional orchards. Organic management (OM) of orchards mainly includes taking advantage of natural enemies and beneficial weeds as well as soil organisms and controlling harmful pests. Here we conducted a three-year experiment on the effects of managing biodiversity in an organic apple orchard, using cattle manure to enrich soil biota, propagating native plant to suppress weeds and applying ecological pest management to control pests. The effect was assessed against the conventional management (CM) model. We found that OM enhanced soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. The 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing results indicated that the dominant bacterial phyla of the top soil were Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and OM had richer bacteria diversity with a 7% higher Shannon's index than the CM. In particular, the relative abundance of rhizobium in the OM was higher than that of the CM. For OM, Duchesnea indica was an ideal ground-cover plant to control weeds through winning the niche competition and thus decreased weeds' Simpson, Shannon-Wiener and Pielou index by 38.2%, 53.8% and 16.9% separately. The phototactic pests' weight and scarab beetle's population were effectively decreased by 35% and 86% respectively through long time control and prevention. OM had an average of 20 times more earthworms than CM, and the maximum density had reached 369 m(-2) (0-20 cm soil). The dominant earthworm species of the OM were detritivores which preferring soil with high organic matter content. Due to no synthetic chemicals being used, the OM produced much safer apple fruits which were sold at high prices. Economically, up to a 103% increase of output-input ratio had been achieved in the OM. Our study clearly demonstrated that biodiversity management without chemical pollution increased the biodiversity of beneficial organisms, reduced antagonists of the fruit tree, and enhanced economic benefits of the apple orchard.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2137</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27366643</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>16S rDNA ; Actinobacteria ; Agricultural Science ; Agroecology ; Antagonists ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity management ; Chemical pollution ; Detritivores ; Disease management ; Duchesnea indica ; Ecology ; Economic aspects ; Economics ; Fertilizers ; Fruits ; Herbicides ; Manures ; Microbiology ; Natural enemies ; Next-generation sequencing ; Orchards ; Organic apple orchard ; Organic farming ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Pest control ; Pests ; Proteobacteria ; rRNA 16S ; Soil bacterial diversity ; Soil carbon ; Soil microorganisms ; Soil Science ; Sustainable agriculture ; Sustainable development ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2016-06, Vol.4, p.e2137-e2137, Article e2137</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 Meng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2016 Meng et al. 2016 Meng et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1953995740/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1953995740?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,37013,44590,53791,53793,75126</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366643$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Caihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guanglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xiaofan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Liyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muminov, Mahmud A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Xiaotian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Gaoming</creatorcontrib><title>Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><description>Organic farming has been regarded as an alternative solution for both agricultural sustainability and human health maintenance. Few researches have concentrated on the differences of biodiversity and eco-economic benefits between organic and conventional orchards. Organic management (OM) of orchards mainly includes taking advantage of natural enemies and beneficial weeds as well as soil organisms and controlling harmful pests. Here we conducted a three-year experiment on the effects of managing biodiversity in an organic apple orchard, using cattle manure to enrich soil biota, propagating native plant to suppress weeds and applying ecological pest management to control pests. The effect was assessed against the conventional management (CM) model. We found that OM enhanced soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. The 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing results indicated that the dominant bacterial phyla of the top soil were Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and OM had richer bacteria diversity with a 7% higher Shannon's index than the CM. In particular, the relative abundance of rhizobium in the OM was higher than that of the CM. For OM, Duchesnea indica was an ideal ground-cover plant to control weeds through winning the niche competition and thus decreased weeds' Simpson, Shannon-Wiener and Pielou index by 38.2%, 53.8% and 16.9% separately. The phototactic pests' weight and scarab beetle's population were effectively decreased by 35% and 86% respectively through long time control and prevention. OM had an average of 20 times more earthworms than CM, and the maximum density had reached 369 m(-2) (0-20 cm soil). The dominant earthworm species of the OM were detritivores which preferring soil with high organic matter content. Due to no synthetic chemicals being used, the OM produced much safer apple fruits which were sold at high prices. Economically, up to a 103% increase of output-input ratio had been achieved in the OM. Our study clearly demonstrated that biodiversity management without chemical pollution increased the biodiversity of beneficial organisms, reduced antagonists of the fruit tree, and enhanced economic benefits of the apple orchard.</description><subject>16S rDNA</subject><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>Agricultural Science</subject><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Antagonists</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity management</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Detritivores</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Duchesnea indica</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Manures</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>Orchards</subject><subject>Organic apple orchard</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Proteobacteria</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Soil bacterial diversity</subject><subject>Soil carbon</subject><subject>Soil microorganisms</subject><subject>Soil Science</subject><subject>Sustainable agriculture</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkt9rFDEQxxdRbKl98Q-QBUFEuDO_Ntl9EWrRWij4oq-G2WT2Nsducia7hf73ZnttvROThySTz3wzM5mieE3JWimqPu4Q43bNKFfPilNGpVrVvGqeH-xPivOUtiSPmklS85fFCVNcSin4afHrswvW3WJMbrorR_CwwRH9VIauDHED3pm8mh6iLdH34A2msg1TX6IJQ9g4A0MJ3i5HH8ZM72Lo3AStG7Liq-JFB0PC84f1rPj59cuPy2-rm-9X15cXNysjlZpWjZBoUKCgtWXEQkVFQ5WRtbUAyFqsODVVbQGJZQ3BGlRXMVIx1TZt9uJnxfVe1wbY6l10I8Q7HcDpe0POREOcnBlQW2IMqYyClnDBOWvBAHIUBEFyQUjW-rTX2s3tiNbkakQYjkSPb7zr9SbcatGwHMoSzPsHgRh-z5gmPbpkcBjAY5iTpjWhgimpFvTtP-g2zNHnUmnaVLxpKiXIX2oDOQHnu5DfNYuovqhyDpJytlDr_1B5Wsz_Ejx2LtuPHN4dOPQIw9SnMMyTCz4dgx_2oIkhpYjdUzEo0UsX6vsu1EsXZvjNYfme0Mee438AKYTXzQ</recordid><startdate>20160623</startdate><enddate>20160623</enddate><creator>Meng, Jie</creator><creator>Li, Lijun</creator><creator>Liu, Haitao</creator><creator>Li, Yong</creator><creator>Li, Caihong</creator><creator>Wu, Guanglei</creator><creator>Yu, Xiaofan</creator><creator>Guo, Liyue</creator><creator>Cheng, Da</creator><creator>Muminov, Mahmud A</creator><creator>Liang, Xiaotian</creator><creator>Jiang, Gaoming</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><general>PeerJ, Inc</general><general>PeerJ Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160623</creationdate><title>Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability</title><author>Meng, Jie ; Li, Lijun ; Liu, Haitao ; Li, Yong ; Li, Caihong ; Wu, Guanglei ; Yu, Xiaofan ; Guo, Liyue ; Cheng, Da ; Muminov, Mahmud A ; Liang, Xiaotian ; Jiang, Gaoming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>16S rDNA</topic><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>Agricultural Science</topic><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Antagonists</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity management</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Detritivores</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Duchesnea indica</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Manures</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>Orchards</topic><topic>Organic apple orchard</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Proteobacteria</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Soil bacterial diversity</topic><topic>Soil carbon</topic><topic>Soil microorganisms</topic><topic>Soil Science</topic><topic>Sustainable agriculture</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meng, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Haitao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Caihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Guanglei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Xiaofan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Liyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muminov, Mahmud A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Xiaotian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Gaoming</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meng, Jie</au><au>Li, Lijun</au><au>Liu, Haitao</au><au>Li, Yong</au><au>Li, Caihong</au><au>Wu, Guanglei</au><au>Yu, Xiaofan</au><au>Guo, Liyue</au><au>Cheng, Da</au><au>Muminov, Mahmud A</au><au>Liang, Xiaotian</au><au>Jiang, Gaoming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>PeerJ</addtitle><date>2016-06-23</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>4</volume><spage>e2137</spage><epage>e2137</epage><pages>e2137-e2137</pages><artnum>e2137</artnum><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Organic farming has been regarded as an alternative solution for both agricultural sustainability and human health maintenance. Few researches have concentrated on the differences of biodiversity and eco-economic benefits between organic and conventional orchards. Organic management (OM) of orchards mainly includes taking advantage of natural enemies and beneficial weeds as well as soil organisms and controlling harmful pests. Here we conducted a three-year experiment on the effects of managing biodiversity in an organic apple orchard, using cattle manure to enrich soil biota, propagating native plant to suppress weeds and applying ecological pest management to control pests. The effect was assessed against the conventional management (CM) model. We found that OM enhanced soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. The 16S rDNA high-throughput sequencing results indicated that the dominant bacterial phyla of the top soil were Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and OM had richer bacteria diversity with a 7% higher Shannon's index than the CM. In particular, the relative abundance of rhizobium in the OM was higher than that of the CM. For OM, Duchesnea indica was an ideal ground-cover plant to control weeds through winning the niche competition and thus decreased weeds' Simpson, Shannon-Wiener and Pielou index by 38.2%, 53.8% and 16.9% separately. The phototactic pests' weight and scarab beetle's population were effectively decreased by 35% and 86% respectively through long time control and prevention. OM had an average of 20 times more earthworms than CM, and the maximum density had reached 369 m(-2) (0-20 cm soil). The dominant earthworm species of the OM were detritivores which preferring soil with high organic matter content. Due to no synthetic chemicals being used, the OM produced much safer apple fruits which were sold at high prices. Economically, up to a 103% increase of output-input ratio had been achieved in the OM. Our study clearly demonstrated that biodiversity management without chemical pollution increased the biodiversity of beneficial organisms, reduced antagonists of the fruit tree, and enhanced economic benefits of the apple orchard.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><pmid>27366643</pmid><doi>10.7717/peerj.2137</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2016-06, Vol.4, p.e2137-e2137, Article e2137 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d0cc05c7ab034332bacae3e40ea63400 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | 16S rDNA Actinobacteria Agricultural Science Agroecology Antagonists Biodiversity Biodiversity management Chemical pollution Detritivores Disease management Duchesnea indica Ecology Economic aspects Economics Fertilizers Fruits Herbicides Manures Microbiology Natural enemies Next-generation sequencing Orchards Organic apple orchard Organic farming Organic matter Organic soils Pest control Pests Proteobacteria rRNA 16S Soil bacterial diversity Soil carbon Soil microorganisms Soil Science Sustainable agriculture Sustainable development Weed control Weeds |
title | Biodiversity management of organic orchard enhances both ecological and economic profitability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biodiversity%20management%20of%20organic%20orchard%20enhances%20both%20ecological%20and%20economic%20profitability&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Meng,%20Jie&rft.date=2016-06-23&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=e2137&rft.epage=e2137&rft.pages=e2137-e2137&rft.artnum=e2137&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.2137&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA543361320%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-946ece4e418d20da514917c68ddaae2be531c58dae0d290e8a7f520527b9be413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1953995740&rft_id=info:pmid/27366643&rft_galeid=A543361320&rfr_iscdi=true |