Loading…
Psychometric Properties of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses
Patient advocacy exercised by an intensive care nurse refers to the defense of the patient’s interests and rights and can be measured if, for that, there are valid, reliable and reliable instruments, that is, which have their psychometric properties proven. Therefore, the patient’s advocacy processe...
Saved in:
Published in: | SAGE open 2023-10, Vol.13 (4) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-fcf20c2156a4a08cab1de1b5c8b44d0743e99032c6da3d0fc4f52a6d43267be73 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | SAGE open |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila Camponogara, Silviamar Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira Peter, Elizabeth |
description | Patient advocacy exercised by an intensive care nurse refers to the defense of the patient’s interests and rights and can be measured if, for that, there are valid, reliable and reliable instruments, that is, which have their psychometric properties proven. Therefore, the patient’s advocacy processes would be permanently monitored and evaluated, also, the practice would become more visible. Perform psychometric validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Instrumental research for instrument validation, with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses, selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. Participants received information about the research, agreed to respond to the questionnaire and were guaranteed anonymity. From the scale structural exploration by analyzing exploratory, confirmatory and internal consistency of the measurement instrument, the final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors: Factor 1—Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care; Factor 2—Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity; Factor 3—Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care; Factor 4—Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care, and Factor 5—Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background. Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the aforementioned construct, as it presents theoretical and empirical consistency, identifying five dimensions related to the exercise of patient advocacy by the intensive care nurse.
Plain Language Summary
Patient Advocacy Scale for intensive care nurses
The patient advocacy, exercised by an intensive care nurse, refers to the defense of your interests and rights and can be measured if, there are valid and reliable instruments. The aim of this study was validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Methodological study for instrument validation carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software an |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/21582440231218060 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d1894aae570645bea001568ebe81720e</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_21582440231218060</sage_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_d1894aae570645bea001568ebe81720e</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2920539738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-fcf20c2156a4a08cab1de1b5c8b44d0743e99032c6da3d0fc4f52a6d43267be73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1Lw0AQDaJg0f4AbwueU2c_kk2OpfhRKLagnpfJZtKmtN26mxb6791aUUGcy8w85r03wyTJDYcB51rfCZ4VQikQkgteQA5nSe-IpUfw_Fd9mfRDWEKMDDKlRC-ZzsLBLtyaOt9aNvNuS75rKTDXsG5BbIax23RsWO-dRXtgLxZXxBrn2XjT0Sa0e2Ij9MSedz5QuE4uGlwF6n_lq-Tt4f519JROpo_j0XCSWqlllza2EWDjXjkqhMJixWviVWaLSqkatJJUliCFzWuUNTRWNZnAvFZS5LoiLa-S8Um3drg0W9-u0R-Mw9Z8As7PDcZD7IpMzYtSIVKmIVdZRQgQfQuqqOBaAEWt25PW1rv3HYXOLN3Ob-L6RpQCMllqWcQpfpqy3oXgqfl25WCObzB_3hA5gxMn4Jx-VP8nfADyRYW9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2920539738</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychometric Properties of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira ; Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer ; de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti ; Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila ; Camponogara, Silviamar ; Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni ; Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza ; Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira ; Peter, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira ; Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer ; de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti ; Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila ; Camponogara, Silviamar ; Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni ; Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza ; Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira ; Peter, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>Patient advocacy exercised by an intensive care nurse refers to the defense of the patient’s interests and rights and can be measured if, for that, there are valid, reliable and reliable instruments, that is, which have their psychometric properties proven. Therefore, the patient’s advocacy processes would be permanently monitored and evaluated, also, the practice would become more visible. Perform psychometric validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Instrumental research for instrument validation, with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses, selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. Participants received information about the research, agreed to respond to the questionnaire and were guaranteed anonymity. From the scale structural exploration by analyzing exploratory, confirmatory and internal consistency of the measurement instrument, the final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors: Factor 1—Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care; Factor 2—Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity; Factor 3—Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care; Factor 4—Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care, and Factor 5—Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background. Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the aforementioned construct, as it presents theoretical and empirical consistency, identifying five dimensions related to the exercise of patient advocacy by the intensive care nurse.
Plain Language Summary
Patient Advocacy Scale for intensive care nurses
The patient advocacy, exercised by an intensive care nurse, refers to the defense of your interests and rights and can be measured if, there are valid and reliable instruments. The aim of this study was validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Methodological study for instrument validation carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. The final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors. Factor 1 “Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care”; Factor 2 “Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity”; Factor 3 “Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care”; Factor 4 “Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care”; Factor 5 “Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background.” Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the patient advocacy in Intensive Care, by the intensive care nurse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2158-2440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2158-2440</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/21582440231218060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Intensive care ; Nurses ; Quantitative psychology</subject><ispartof>SAGE open, 2023-10, Vol.13 (4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-fcf20c2156a4a08cab1de1b5c8b44d0743e99032c6da3d0fc4f52a6d43267be73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4721-4260 ; 0000-0001-9965-8811 ; 0000-0002-0077-2292 ; 0000-0003-3454-3698 ; 0000-0002-4842-2187</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21582440231218060$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2920539738?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21373,21945,25731,27830,27901,27902,33588,36989,43709,44566,44921,45309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camponogara, Silviamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Psychometric Properties of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses</title><title>SAGE open</title><description>Patient advocacy exercised by an intensive care nurse refers to the defense of the patient’s interests and rights and can be measured if, for that, there are valid, reliable and reliable instruments, that is, which have their psychometric properties proven. Therefore, the patient’s advocacy processes would be permanently monitored and evaluated, also, the practice would become more visible. Perform psychometric validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Instrumental research for instrument validation, with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses, selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. Participants received information about the research, agreed to respond to the questionnaire and were guaranteed anonymity. From the scale structural exploration by analyzing exploratory, confirmatory and internal consistency of the measurement instrument, the final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors: Factor 1—Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care; Factor 2—Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity; Factor 3—Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care; Factor 4—Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care, and Factor 5—Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background. Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the aforementioned construct, as it presents theoretical and empirical consistency, identifying five dimensions related to the exercise of patient advocacy by the intensive care nurse.
Plain Language Summary
Patient Advocacy Scale for intensive care nurses
The patient advocacy, exercised by an intensive care nurse, refers to the defense of your interests and rights and can be measured if, there are valid and reliable instruments. The aim of this study was validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Methodological study for instrument validation carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. The final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors. Factor 1 “Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care”; Factor 2 “Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity”; Factor 3 “Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care”; Factor 4 “Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care”; Factor 5 “Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background.” Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the patient advocacy in Intensive Care, by the intensive care nurse.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><issn>2158-2440</issn><issn>2158-2440</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UU1Lw0AQDaJg0f4AbwueU2c_kk2OpfhRKLagnpfJZtKmtN26mxb6791aUUGcy8w85r03wyTJDYcB51rfCZ4VQikQkgteQA5nSe-IpUfw_Fd9mfRDWEKMDDKlRC-ZzsLBLtyaOt9aNvNuS75rKTDXsG5BbIax23RsWO-dRXtgLxZXxBrn2XjT0Sa0e2Ij9MSedz5QuE4uGlwF6n_lq-Tt4f519JROpo_j0XCSWqlllza2EWDjXjkqhMJixWviVWaLSqkatJJUliCFzWuUNTRWNZnAvFZS5LoiLa-S8Um3drg0W9-u0R-Mw9Z8As7PDcZD7IpMzYtSIVKmIVdZRQgQfQuqqOBaAEWt25PW1rv3HYXOLN3Ob-L6RpQCMllqWcQpfpqy3oXgqfl25WCObzB_3hA5gxMn4Jx-VP8nfADyRYW9</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira</creator><creator>Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer</creator><creator>de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti</creator><creator>Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila</creator><creator>Camponogara, Silviamar</creator><creator>Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni</creator><creator>Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza</creator><creator>Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira</creator><creator>Peter, Elizabeth</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><general>SAGE Publishing</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4721-4260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0077-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-3698</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-2187</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Psychometric Properties of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses</title><author>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira ; Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer ; de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti ; Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila ; Camponogara, Silviamar ; Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni ; Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza ; Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira ; Peter, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-fcf20c2156a4a08cab1de1b5c8b44d0743e99032c6da3d0fc4f52a6d43267be73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Camponogara, Silviamar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>SAGE open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas, Mara Ambrosina de Oliveira</au><au>Aguilar Leocádio de Menezes, Jennifer</au><au>de Farias Brehmer, Laura Cavalcanti</au><au>Geri Tomaschewski-Barlem, Jamila</au><au>Camponogara, Silviamar</au><au>Schneider, Dulcinéia Ghizoni</au><au>Ramos, Flávia Regina Souza</au><au>Cardozo, Daniela de Oliveira</au><au>Peter, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychometric Properties of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses</atitle><jtitle>SAGE open</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>2158-2440</issn><eissn>2158-2440</eissn><abstract>Patient advocacy exercised by an intensive care nurse refers to the defense of the patient’s interests and rights and can be measured if, for that, there are valid, reliable and reliable instruments, that is, which have their psychometric properties proven. Therefore, the patient’s advocacy processes would be permanently monitored and evaluated, also, the practice would become more visible. Perform psychometric validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Instrumental research for instrument validation, with exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses, selected by non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. Participants received information about the research, agreed to respond to the questionnaire and were guaranteed anonymity. From the scale structural exploration by analyzing exploratory, confirmatory and internal consistency of the measurement instrument, the final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors: Factor 1—Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care; Factor 2—Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity; Factor 3—Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care; Factor 4—Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care, and Factor 5—Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background. Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the aforementioned construct, as it presents theoretical and empirical consistency, identifying five dimensions related to the exercise of patient advocacy by the intensive care nurse.
Plain Language Summary
Patient Advocacy Scale for intensive care nurses
The patient advocacy, exercised by an intensive care nurse, refers to the defense of your interests and rights and can be measured if, there are valid and reliable instruments. The aim of this study was validation of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses (EAPEnf-ICU). Methodological study for instrument validation carried out from January to June 2021 with 377 Brazilian intensive care nurses. Data were collected by means of Google Forms, organized on Excel® 2010 software and analyzed on R software. The Ethics Committee approved the study. The final version of the EAPEnf-ICU was composed of 54 items, distributed in 5 dimensions/factors. Factor 1 “Clinical and organizational advocacy in intensive care”; Factor 2 “Barriers associated with the intensive care clinical and organizational complexity”; Factor 3 “Attitudes to promote the autonomy of patients and family members in intensive care”; Factor 4 “Barriers associated with divergences and ethical-professional limits in intensive care”; Factor 5 “Intensive care nurse’s personal and professional background.” Findings point that the instrument presented in this study is valid and reliable for assessing the patient advocacy in Intensive Care, by the intensive care nurse.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/21582440231218060</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4721-4260</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9965-8811</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0077-2292</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3454-3698</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-2187</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2158-2440 |
ispartof | SAGE open, 2023-10, Vol.13 (4) |
issn | 2158-2440 2158-2440 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d1894aae570645bea001568ebe81720e |
source | Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
subjects | Advocacy Intensive care Nurses Quantitative psychology |
title | Psychometric Properties of the Patient Advocacy Scale for Intensive Care Nurses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T21%3A33%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychometric%20Properties%20of%20the%20Patient%20Advocacy%20Scale%20for%20Intensive%20Care%20Nurses&rft.jtitle=SAGE%20open&rft.au=Vargas,%20Mara%20Ambrosina%20de%20Oliveira&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=2158-2440&rft.eissn=2158-2440&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/21582440231218060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2920539738%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-fcf20c2156a4a08cab1de1b5c8b44d0743e99032c6da3d0fc4f52a6d43267be73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2920539738&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_21582440231218060&rfr_iscdi=true |